Does additional acute phase inpatient rehabilitation help people return to work? A subgroup analysis from a randomized controlled trial

Objective: To investigate if a Saturday rehabilitation service in addition to usual care improved return to work outcomes 12 months post discharge and to report predictors of return to work. Design: Subgroup analysis of a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Setting: General inpatient rehabilitation service. Subjects: A mixed cohort of 137 adults previously engaged in work, who were admitted for inpatient rehabilitation and allocated to a control group (n=63) or an intervention group (n=74). Intervention: The control group received usual care rehabilitation from Monday to Friday and the intervention group received usual care plus an additional rehabilitation service on Saturdays (physiotherapy and occupational therapy). Main outcome: Return to paid or unpaid work. Results: After 12 months, 36 participants (57%) in the control group and 38 participants (51%) in the intervention group had returned to work. There was no difference between groups (mean difference -1.06 hours per week, 95% CI -8.70 to 6.57) in return to work outcomes. Functional status on discharge (OR 1.05, 95%CI 1.00 to 1.10), an orthopaedic diagnosis (OR 4.92, 95%CI 2.01 to 12.03) and engagement in unpaid work prior to rehabilitation (OR 5.08, 95%CI 1.39 to 18.58) were predictive of return to work at 12 months. Conclusion: A Saturday rehabilitation service in addition to usual care showed no improvement in return to work outcomes at 12 months. Predictors of return to work may help identify those at risk of not returning to work and who require follow-up vocational rehabilitation services.

[1]  N. Taylor,et al.  Additional Saturday rehabilitation improves functional independence and quality of life and reduces length of stay: a randomized controlled trial , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[2]  N. Taylor,et al.  A study protocol of a randomised controlled trial incorporating a health economic analysis to investigate if additional allied health services for rehabilitation reduce length of stay without compromising patient outcomes , 2010, BMC health services research.

[3]  Emma Irvin,et al.  Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. , 2006, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[4]  H. DeVon,et al.  Stroke. Risks, recognition, and return to work. , 2002, AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses.

[5]  T. J. Sullivan,et al.  Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: challenges for future research. , 2001, American journal of industrial medicine.

[6]  D. Cifu,et al.  Functional outcomes of older adults with traumatic brain injury: a prospective, multicenter analysis. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Richard J. Butler,et al.  Managing Work Disability: Why First Return to Work is Not a Measure of Success , 1995 .

[8]  C. Granger,et al.  Disability outcomes following inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. , 1994, Physical therapy.

[9]  R. Black-Schaffer,et al.  Return to work after stroke: development of a predictive model. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  J H Siegel,et al.  Factors influencing return to work following hospitalization for traumatic injury. , 1987, American journal of public health.

[11]  M. J. Stern,et al.  Life adjustment postmyocardial infarction: determining predictive variables. , 1977, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  B. Bonder,et al.  The effectiveness of a comprehensive work hardening program as measured by lifting capacity, pain scales, and depression scores. , 2005, Work.

[13]  A. Williams EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[14]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.