Two-Component Signal Transduction in Bacillus subtilis: How One Organism Sees Its World

Variability and adaptability are crucial characteristics of organisms possessing the ability to survive and prosper in a wide variety of environmental conditions. The most adaptable bacteria contain a large reservoir of genetic information encoding biochemical pathways designed to cope with a variety of environmental situations. Organisms that have the genetic capability to respond to altered conditions do so when stimulated by specific signals. Recognition of specific signals and conversion of this information into specific transcriptional or behavioral responses is the essence of signal transduction. A mechanism commonly found in bacteria for signal transduction is the two-component system (23, 26). Its basis is the conversion of signal recognition to a chemical entity, i.e., a phosphoryl group, that modifies the functional activity of proteins. Signal recognition and transduction are the province of the sensor histidine kinase component of the system. This protein has separable sensor and histidine phosphotransferase domains that function to recognize (bind) the signal, causing the kinase to autophosphorylate a histidine residue of the phosphotransferase domain (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). The phosphoryl group is subsequently transferred to the second component protein, the response regulator, where it resides as an acyl phosphate of an aspartic acid residue. The response regulator consists of the phosphorylatable aspartate domain and an output domain that is activated to carry out its function by conformational or, perhaps, electrostatic alterations induced by the phosphoryl group. In most cases, the response regulator is a transcription activator for genes whose products are specifically utilized to respond to the unique nature of a given input signal. In the chemotaxis system of bacteria, the response regulator determines the direction of rotation of the flagellar motor. The basics of the signal transduction mechanism remain the same regardless of the input signal or the function of the response regulator. FIG. 1 Schematic view of two-component and phosphorelay systems. Activation signals recognized by sensor domains of histidine kinases result in autophosphorylation of a histidine in the histidine phosphotransferase domain (His PTase). The phosphoryl group (P) ... This phosphoryl group-based signal transduction mechanism exists in two major conformations in microorganisms: the two-component system and a four-component system termed the phosphorelay (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Signal interpretation and transduction by histidine kinases are the same in both, but the target of the kinase in a phosphorelay is a single-domain response regulator consisting of only the phosphorylated aspartate domain. This phosphorylated protein serves as a substrate for a phosphotransferase that transfers the phosphoryl group to a response regulator-transcription factor. The phosphotransferase is transiently phosphorylated on a histidine during this process. In a phosphorelay, the phosphoryl group is transferred in the order His-Asp-His-Asp, which differs from the His-Asp series of a two-component system. In the first-discovered phosphorelay used to initiate sporulation in Bacillus subtilis, all of the components (domains) reside on different proteins (4). Subsequently discovered phosphorelays in bacteria, fungi, and plants use composite proteins where the kinase and first response regulator domain and sometimes the phosphotransferase domain are contiguous within a single polypeptide chain (1, 6). The sporulation initiation phosphorelay is a signal integration circuit that processes both positive and negative signals, which suggests that phosphorelays are used where a number of opposing signals must be interpreted by the signal transduction system (22).

[1]  P. Matsumura,et al.  The CheZ-binding Surface of CheY Overlaps the CheA- and FliM-binding Surfaces* , 1997, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  J. Hoch,et al.  Molecular recognition in signal transduction: the interaction surfaces of the Spo0F response regulator with its cognate phosphorelay proteins revealed by alanine scanning mutagenesis. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  M. Inouye,et al.  Signal transduction via the histidyl‐aspartyl phosphorelay , 1997, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[4]  J. Hoch,et al.  Multisensory activation of the phosphorelay initiating sporulation in Bacillus subtilis: identification and sequence of the protein kinase of the alternate pathway , 1993, Molecular microbiology.

[5]  A. Grossman Genetic networks controlling the initiation of sporulation and the development of genetic competence in Bacillus subtilis. , 1995, Annual review of genetics.

[6]  J. Hoch,et al.  Deactivation of the sporulation transcription factor Spo0A by the Spo0E protein phosphatase. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Wei Liu,et al.  Pho signal transduction network reveals direct transcriptional regulation of one two‐component system by another two‐component regulator: Bacillus subtilis PhoP directly regulates production of ResD , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[8]  Analysis of a suppressor mutation ssb (kinC) of sur0B20 (spo0A) mutation in Bacillus subtilis reveals that kinC encodes a histidine protein kinase , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  J. Thompson,et al.  Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.

[10]  S. Tabata,et al.  Compilation of all genes encoding bacterial two-component signal transducers in the genome of the cyanobacterium, Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803. , 1996, DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes.

[11]  J. Hoch,et al.  Initiation of sporulation in B. subtilis is controlled by a multicomponent phosphorelay , 1991, Cell.

[12]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Signal Transduction via the Multi-Step Phosphorelay: Not Necessarily a Road Less Traveled , 1996, Cell.

[13]  F M Hulett,et al.  Three two‐component signal‐transduction systems interact for Pho regulation in Bacillus subtilis , 1996, Molecular microbiology.

[14]  A. Grossman,et al.  Isolation and characterization of kinC, a gene that encodes a sensor kinase homologous to the sporulation sensor kinases KinA and KinB in Bacillus subtilis , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  R. Dickerson,et al.  Structure of the Escherichia coli response regulator NarL. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[16]  G. Ordal,et al.  CheC and CheD interact to regulate methylation of Bacillus subtilis methyl‐accepting chemotaxis proteins , 1996, Molecular microbiology.

[17]  A. Ninfa,et al.  Protein phosphorylation and regulation of adaptive responses in bacteria. , 1989, Microbiological reviews.

[18]  J. Hoch,et al.  A Two-Component Signal Transduction System Essential for Growth of Bacillus subtilis: Implications for Anti-Infective Therapy , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[19]  I. Zhulin,et al.  PAS domain S-boxes in Archaea, Bacteria and sensors for oxygen and redox. , 1997, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[20]  Two-component regulatory proteins ResD-ResE are required for transcriptional activation of fnr upon oxygen limitation in Bacillus subtilis , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[21]  T. Mizuno,et al.  Compilation of all genes encoding two-component phosphotransfer signal transducers in the genome of Escherichia coli. , 1997, DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes.

[22]  S J Remington,et al.  Two binding modes reveal flexibility in kinase/response regulator interactions in the bacterial chemotaxis pathway. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  K. Volz,et al.  Structural conservation in the CheY superfamily. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[24]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Communication modules in bacterial signaling proteins. , 1992, Annual review of genetics.

[25]  C. Walsh,et al.  Cross-talk between the Histidine Protein Kinase VanS and the Response Regulator PhoB , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  A. Goffeau,et al.  The complete genome sequence of the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis , 1997, Nature.

[27]  L. Shapiro,et al.  Protein localization and cell fate in bacteria. , 1997, Science.

[28]  J. Stock,et al.  Stimulus response coupling in bacterial chemotaxis: receptor dimers in signalling arrays , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[29]  Ann M Stock,et al.  The DNA-binding domain of OmpR: crystal structures of a winged helix transcription factor. , 1997, Structure.

[30]  M. Débarbouillé,et al.  Characterization of a Novel Member of the DegS-DegU Regulon Affected by Salt Stress in Bacillus subtilis , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.