Adaptive radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for head and neck cancer in definitive and postoperative settings: initial results.

AIMS To assess whether routine mid-treatment replanning in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients results in meaningful improvements in target or normal tissue dosimetry and to assess which patients derive the greatest benefit. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty patients treated with either postoperative chemoradiotherapy or definitive chemoradiotherapy with primary or nodal disease ≥3cm in size were included in this prospective pilot study. Seven patients received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 13 received definitive chemoradiotherapy. Patients were planned and treated on a helical tomotherapy system. All patients had a second computed tomography scan after 15 fractions and a new plan based on this was initiated from fraction 20. RESULTS Relative volume changes between computed tomography scans were: GTV 29%; CTV60 (adjuvant patients) 4%; parotid volume 17.5%; median reduction in neck separation 6-7 mm; weight loss 3%. For the group overall and for the definitively treated patient cohort, respectively, adapted plans resulted in reductions in PTV66 D(1) (0.3Gy, P=0.01 and 0.5Gy, P=0.01); PTV54 D(1) (0.6Gy, P<0.0001 and 0.9Gy, P=0.0002); spinal cord maximum (0.5Gy, P=0.004 and 0.6Gy, P=0.04) and volume of skin receiving ≥50Gy (16 cm(2), P=0.01 and 19 cm(2), P=0.001). Definitively treated patients also had a reduction in mean parotid dose (0.6Gy, P=0.046) and volume of normal tissue receiving ≥50Gy (67 cm(3), P=0.02). Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma received the greatest benefits with treatment adaptation with reduction in spinal cord maximum 1.2Gy, mean parotid dose 1.2Gy and parotid V(26) 6.3%. There was no significant benefit for adjuvant patients. Other factors associated with greater benefits were greater weight loss and greater reduction in neck separation and higher T stage. CONCLUSIONS There is minimal benefit to routine adaptive replanning in unselected patients, and no benefit in adjuvantly treated patients. Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma or with greater weight loss or reduction in neck separation did have clinically significant benefits. These patients should be targeted for adaptive strategies.

[1]  Lei Dong,et al.  Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer—Can an Old Goal Evolve into a New Standard? , 2010, Journal of oncology.

[2]  Weiguo Lu,et al.  Assessment of parotid gland dose changes during head and neck cancer radiotherapy using daily megavoltage computed tomography and deformable image registration. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Qiuwen Wu,et al.  Adaptive replanning strategies accounting for shrinkage in head and neck IMRT. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  N G Burnet,et al.  Tumour shrinkage and contour change during radiotherapy increase the dose to organs at risk but not the target volumes for head and neck cancer patients treated on the TomoTherapy HiArt™ system. , 2011, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[5]  Ping Xia,et al.  Repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Parotid gland dose in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: is what you plan what you get? , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  J O Archambeau,et al.  Pathophysiology of irradiated skin and breast. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  R K Ten Haken,et al.  Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Benoît Macq,et al.  Comparison of 12 deformable registration strategies in adaptive radiation therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  Haihua Yang,et al.  Clinical study of the necessity of replanning before the 25th fraction during the course of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Xavier Geets,et al.  Adaptive radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. , 2010, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[12]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  Dose-volume modeling of salivary function in patients with head-and-neck cancer receiving radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  J. Betka,et al.  Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) in head and neck region: review of literature. , 2009, Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale.

[14]  Kevin J Harrington,et al.  Weekly volume and dosimetric changes during chemoradiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a prospective observational study. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  S. Nill,et al.  Evaluation of salivary gland function after treatment of head-and-neck tumors with intensity-modulated radiotherapy by quantitative pertechnetate scintigraphy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  M. Hoogeman,et al.  Local anatomic changes in parotid and submandibular glands during radiotherapy for oropharynx cancer and correlation with dose, studied in detail with nonrigid registration. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Ping Xia,et al.  Dosimetric evaluation of automatic segmentation for adaptive IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Timothy E Schultheiss,et al.  Actual dose variation of parotid glands and spinal cord for nasopharyngeal cancer patients during radiotherapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Johannes A Langendijk,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy reduces radiation-induced morbidity and improves health-related quality of life: results of a nonrandomized prospective study using a standardized follow-up program. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.