Improving the PROSPECT Model to Consider Anisotropic Scattering of Leaf Internal Materials and Its Use for Retrieving Leaf Biomass in Fresh Leaves

The PROSPECT model has been widely used to estimate leaf biochemical constituents, but retrieval of leaf mass per area (LMA) in fresh leaves has proved to be difficult due to the predominant water absorption in the infrared spectral region. At wavelengths where water absorption is low, both LMA absorption and light scattering are relatively high. Therefore, the uncertainty in scattering simulation at these wavelengths will lead to a relatively large error in LMA estimation. In this paper, we introduce a wavelength-independent factor to represent the first-order effect of anisotropic scattering in the elementary layer in the modified model PROSPECT-g, aiming at appropriately simulating leaf optical properties in spectral regions with high scattering and thus reducing the uncertainty in LMA estimation. In order to avoid introducing a new variable to be retrieved in model inversion, this factor is an intermediate variable derived from measured near infrared region spectral data and other existing model parameters. Results show that about 30%–40% of the tested samples are well simulated using PROSPECT-5, while for the rest of the samples simulation is greatly improved with PROSPECT-g. Leaf reflectance and transmittance reconstructions using PROSPECT-g are improved, especially at wavelengths with high scattering such as 750–1400 and 1500–1850 nm. LMA retrieval is significantly improved, with the average root-mean-square error decreasing from 38.7 (PROSPECT-5) to 16.6 g/m2 (PROSPECT-g) for 628 leaves after considering anisotropic scattering in the elementary layer. Improvements are particularly noticeable for leaves with extremely high LMA contents.

[1]  W. Verhoef,et al.  PROSPECT+SAIL models: A review of use for vegetation characterization , 2009 .

[2]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Estimation of fuel moisture content by inversion of radiative transfer models to simulate equivalent water thickness and dry matter content: analysis at leaf and canopy level , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Margaret Kalacska,et al.  Differences in leaf traits, leaf internal structure, and spectral reflectance between two communities of lianas and trees: Implications for remote sensing in tropical environments , 2009 .

[4]  L. Poorter,et al.  Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[5]  S. Ustin,et al.  Estimating leaf biochemistry using the PROSPECT leaf optical properties model , 1996 .

[6]  H. Lichtenthaler CHLOROPHYLL AND CAROTENOIDS: PIGMENTS OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC BIOMEMBRANES , 1987 .

[7]  P. Matile,et al.  Biochemistry of Indian summer: physiology of autumnal leaf coloration , 2000, Experimental Gerontology.

[8]  R. Clark,et al.  Spectroscopic Determination of Leaf Biochemistry Using Band-Depth Analysis of Absorption Features and Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression , 1999 .

[9]  C. Wessman,et al.  Remote sensing of canopy chemistry and nitrogen cycling in temperate forest ecosystems , 1988, Nature.

[10]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Multi-method ensemble selection of spectral bands related to leaf biochemistry , 2015 .

[11]  John R. Miller,et al.  Assessing vineyard condition with hyperspectral indices: Leaf and canopy reflectance simulation in a row-structured discontinuous canopy , 2005 .

[12]  K. Thompson,et al.  The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents , 2004 .

[13]  H. Gausman,et al.  Interaction of Isotropic Light with a Compact Plant Leaf , 1969 .

[14]  J. Chen,et al.  Retrieving chlorophyll content in conifer needles from hyperspectral measurements , 2008, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing.

[15]  Xianjun Hao,et al.  Estimating dry matter content from spectral reflectance for green leaves of different species , 2011 .

[16]  W. Smith,et al.  Ontogenetic differences in mesophyll structure and chlorophyll distribution in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus. , 1999, American journal of botany.

[17]  K. Soudani,et al.  Calibration and validation of hyperspectral indices for the estimation of broadleaved forest leaf chlorophyll content, leaf mass per area, leaf area index and leaf canopy biomass , 2008 .

[18]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Joint leaf chlorophyll content and leaf area index retrieval from Landsat data using a regularized model inversion system (REGFLEC) , 2015 .

[19]  Margaret Kalacska,et al.  Estimation of foliar chlorophyll and nitrogen content in an ombrotrophic bog from hyperspectral data: Scaling from leaf to image , 2015 .

[20]  Emilio Chuvieco,et al.  Linking ecological information and radiative transfer models to estimate fuel moisture content in the Mediterranean region of Spain: Solving the ill-posed inverse problem , 2009 .

[21]  P. Reich,et al.  From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Jean-Baptiste Féret,et al.  Deriving leaf mass per area (LMA) from foliar reflectance across a variety of plant species using continuous wavelet analysis , 2014 .

[23]  Yuri Knyazikhin,et al.  Retrieval of canopy biophysical variables from bidirectional reflectance Using prior information to solve the ill-posed inverse problem , 2003 .

[24]  D. Sims,et al.  Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages , 2002 .

[25]  K. Barry,et al.  Optimizing spectral indices and chemometric analysis of leaf chemical properties using radiative transfer modeling , 2011 .

[26]  H. Mohr,et al.  ABSORPTION SPECTRA OF LEAVES CORRECTED FOR SCATTERING and DISTRIBUTIONAL ERROR: A RADIATIVE TRANSFER and ABSORPTION STATISTICS TREATMENT , 1993 .

[27]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[28]  John R. Miller,et al.  Scaling-up and model inversion methods with narrowband optical indices for chlorophyll content estimation in closed forest canopies with hyperspectral data , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[29]  Marco Heurich,et al.  Estimating leaf functional traits by inversion of PROSPECT: Assessing leaf dry matter content and specific leaf area in mixed mountainous forest , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[30]  G. Carter,et al.  Leaf optical properties in higher plants: linking spectral characteristics to stress and chlorophyll concentration. , 2001, American journal of botany.

[31]  L. C. Henyey,et al.  Diffuse radiation in the Galaxy , 1940 .

[32]  J. Norman,et al.  Leaf Optical Properties , 1991 .

[33]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Quantifying the influences of spectral resolution on uncertainty in leaf trait estimates through a Bayesian approach to RTM inversion , 2016 .

[34]  Quan Wang,et al.  Retrieval of Leaf Biochemical Parameters Using PROSPECT Inversion: A New Approach for Alleviating Ill-Posed Problems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[35]  Holly Croft,et al.  The applicability of empirical vegetation indices for determining leaf chlorophyll content over different leaf and canopy structures , 2014 .

[36]  E. Hunt,et al.  Estimating near-infrared leaf reflectance from leaf structural characteristics. , 2001, American journal of botany.

[37]  E. Garnier,et al.  Leaf anatomy, specific mass and water content in congeneric annual and perennial grass species , 1994 .

[38]  Thomas C. Vogelmann,et al.  The functional significance of palisade tissue : penetration of directional versus diffuse light , 1993 .

[39]  H. Lichtenthaler Vegetation stress : an introduction to the stress concept in plants , 1996 .

[40]  S. Jacquemoud,et al.  Leaf BRDF measurements and model for specular and diffuse components differentiation , 2005 .

[41]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Applicability of the PROSPECT model for estimating protein and cellulose + lignin in fresh leaves , 2015 .

[42]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Leaf chlorophyll content retrieval from airborne hyperspectral remote sensing imagery , 2008 .

[43]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Taxonomy and remote sensing of leaf mass per area (LMA) in humid tropical forests. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[44]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Leaf structure and anatomy as related to leaf mass per area variation in seedlings of a wide range of woody plant species and types , 2000, Oecologia.

[45]  Yuri A. Gritz,et al.  Relationships between leaf chlorophyll content and spectral reflectance and algorithms for non-destructive chlorophyll assessment in higher plant leaves. , 2003, Journal of plant physiology.

[46]  F. Baret,et al.  PROSPECT: A model of leaf optical properties spectra , 1990 .

[47]  K. Chartzoulakisa,et al.  Water stress affects leaf anatomy , gas exchange , water relations and growth of two avocado cultivars , 2002 .

[48]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Chlorophyll Fluorescence Effects on Vegetation Apparent Reflectance: I. Leaf-Level Measurements and Model Simulation , 2000 .

[49]  William K. Smith,et al.  Chlorophyll and light gradients in sun and shade leaves of Spinacia oleracea , 1991 .

[50]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Parameterization and Sensitivity Analysis of the BIOME–BGC Terrestrial Ecosystem Model: Net Primary Production Controls , 2000 .

[51]  Flavio Cannavó,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for volcanic source modeling quality assessment and model selection , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[52]  Pol Coppin,et al.  A dorsiventral leaf radiative transfer model: Development, validation and improved model inversion techniques , 2009 .

[53]  S. Ustin,et al.  Leaf Optical Properties , 2019 .

[54]  P. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Carotenoid content estimation in a heterogeneous conifer forest using narrow-band indices and PROSPECT + DART simulations , 2012 .

[55]  C. François,et al.  Towards universal broad leaf chlorophyll indices using PROSPECT simulated database and hyperspectral reflectance measurements , 2004 .

[56]  Albert Olioso,et al.  Modeling directional–hemispherical reflectance and transmittance of fresh and dry leaves from 0.4 μm to 5.7 μm with the PROSPECT-VISIR model , 2011 .

[57]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Functional leaf attributes predict litter decomposition rate in herbaceous plants. , 1997, The New phytologist.

[58]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  PROSPECT-4 and 5: Advances in the leaf optical properties model separating photosynthetic pigments , 2008 .

[59]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Exploring variation in leaf mass per area (LMA) from leaf to cell: an anatomical analysis of 26 woody species. , 2013, American journal of botany.

[60]  Alan K. Knapp,et al.  Light and chlorophyll gradients within Cucurbita cotyledons , 1988 .

[61]  Marta Yebra,et al.  Estimation of dry matter content in leaves using normalized indexes and PROSPECT model inversion , 2012 .