Evaluation of the flexural strength of carbon fiber-, quartz fiber-, and glass fiber-based posts.

This study investigated the flexural strength of eight fiber posts (one carbon fiber, one carbon/quartz fiber, one opaque quartz fiber, two translucent quartz fiber, and three glass fiber posts). Eighty fiber posts were used and divided into eight groups (n = 10): G1: C-POST (Bisco); G2: AESTHETI-POST (Bisco); G3: AESTHETI-PLUS (Bisco); G4: LIGHT-POST (Bisco); G5: D.T. LIGHT-POST (Bisco); G6: PARAPOST WHITE (Coltene); G7: FIBERKOR (Pentron); G8: REFORPOST (Angelus). All of the samples were tested using the three-point bending test. The averages obtained were submitted to the ANOVA and to Tukey's test (p < 0.05). The mean values (MPa) of the groups AESTHETI-POST-carbon/quartz fiber post (Bisco) and AESTHETI-PLUS-quartz fiber post (Bisco) were statistically similar and higher than the mean values of the other groups. The mean values of the groups C-POST-carbon fiber post (Bisco), LIGHT-POST-translucent quartz fiber post (Bisco), D.T. LIGHT-POST-double tapered translucent quartz fiber post (Bisco), PARAPOST WHITE-glass fiber post (Coltene) and FIBREKOR--glass fiber post (Pentron) were similar and higher than the group REFORPOST-glass fiber post (Angelus).

[1]  J. Drummond,et al.  Static and cyclic loading of fiber-reinforced dental resin. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  R. Scotti,et al.  Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[3]  M Sherriff,et al.  Three-point bending test of fiber posts. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  I A Mjör,et al.  Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. , 2000, American journal of dentistry.

[5]  F. García-Godoy,et al.  Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. , 2000, American journal of dentistry.

[6]  T. Watson,et al.  Confocal and scanning electron microscopic study of teeth restored with fiber posts, metal posts, and composite resins. , 1999, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  E Asmussen,et al.  Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. , 1999, Journal of dentistry.

[8]  J. Astbäck,et al.  A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  R. Love,et al.  Rigidity and retention of carbon fibre versus stainless steel root canal posts. , 1996, International endodontic journal.

[10]  A. Dallari,et al.  Six years of in vitro/in vivo experience with Composipost. , 1996, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995). Supplement.

[11]  K. Söderholm,et al.  Molecular Orientation of Silane at the Surface of Colloidal Silica , 1993, Journal of dental research.

[12]  A. Morfis Vertical root fractures. , 1990, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[13]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Buonocore memorial lecture. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives. , 1987, Operative dentistry.

[14]  K. Langeland,et al.  Vertical root fracture. , 1982, Journal of endodontics.