A rational interpretation of improved catalytic performances of additive-impregnated dried CoMo hydrotreating catalysts: a combined theoretical and experimental study

CoMo additive-impregnated dried catalysts are studied, exploring the “CoMoS” active phase features by combining X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and catalytic tests. Starting from different polyoxomolybdate precursors, additive-impregnated dried, additive-free dried and calcined catalyst performances are compared. TEM reveals that the mean particle sizes are about 3.1 nm and do not depend on the catalytic precursors except for the additive-free dried catalysts exhibiting higher lengths: 3.7 nm. XPS quantification of the Mo species shows that 75 mol% of the Mo species are present in the MoS2 phase whatever the preparation route. This value is slightly enhanced (ca. 85%) with additive impregnation. The molybdenum to aluminium surface coverage ratio (Mo/Al) ranking is found to be as follows: additive-free dried < additive-impregnated dried < calcined. However, this ranking is not significantly modified by the impregnating solution used, and the behaviour is similar for the cobalt to aluminium ratio (Co/Al). A geometrical model combining XPS quantification of the crystallite's Co/Mo ratio and DFT calculations is used to establish a correlation with the catalytic results obtained in toluene hydrogenation. It is shown that the catalytic performances of additive-free dried, additive-impregnated dried and calcined catalysts directly correlate the number of mixed Co–Mo sites present at the MoS2 edges. DFT calculations highlight that the adsorption step of toluene is thermodynamically favored on the mixed Co–Mo site located at the M-edge. As a consequence, this study suggests that the various routes of preparation leading to different catalytic performances would not lead to new types of active sites or morphology but rather to a different number of mixed sites present at the edges.

[1]  W. Cheng,et al.  NMR study of the adsorption of phosphomolybdates on alumina , 1988 .

[2]  D. Costa,et al.  Optimal promoter edge decoration of CoMoS catalysts: A combined theoretical and experimental study , 2008 .

[3]  I. Chorkendorff,et al.  A combined X-Ray photoelectron and Mössbauer emission spectroscopy study of the state of cobalt in sulfided, supported, and unsupported CoMo catalysts , 1982 .

[4]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Location and coordination of promoter atoms in Co- and Ni-promoted MoS2-based hydrotreating catalysts , 2007 .

[5]  Edmond Payen,et al.  Computational studies of (mixed) sulfide hydrotreating catalysts , 2008 .

[6]  P. Kooyman,et al.  Effect of NTA addition on the structure and activity of the active phase of cobalt-molybdenum sulfide hydrotreating catalysts , 2009 .

[7]  Kresse,et al.  Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[8]  P. Raybaud,et al.  A Rational Comparison of the Optimal Promoter Edge Decoration of HDT NiMoS vs CoMoS Catalysts , 2009 .

[9]  J. Dubois,et al.  Alumina supported HDS catalysts prepared by impregnation with new heteropolycompounds. Comparison with catalysts prepared by conventional Co–Mo–P coimpregnation , 1998 .

[10]  A. Daudin,et al.  A DFT Study of CoMoS and NiMoS Catalysts: from Nano-Crystallite Morphology to Selective Hydrodesulfurization , 2009 .

[11]  M. Genet,et al.  Unsupported cobalt molybdenum sulfide catalysts Part II: Characterization and evolution of physicochemical properties during catalytic reaction , 1984 .

[12]  A. Daudin,et al.  Impact of CO on the transformation of a model FCC gasoline over CoMoS/Al2O3 catalysts: A combined kinetic and DFT approach , 2010 .

[13]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Sulfur bonding in MoS2 and Co-Mo-S structures , 1997 .

[14]  V. Harlé,et al.  Evidence and Characterization of a New Decamolybdocobaltate Cobalt Salt: An Efficient Precursor for Hydrotreatment Catalyst Preparation , 2005 .

[15]  P. Raybaud,et al.  Topological Analysis of the Interactions between Organic Molecules and Co(Ni)MoS Catalytic Active Phases. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[16]  J. Toledo,et al.  Effect of ethyleneglycol addition on the properties of P-doped NiMo/Al2O3 HDS catalysts: Part I. Materials preparation and characterization , 2009 .

[17]  G. Kresse,et al.  Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set , 1996 .

[18]  W. Kohn,et al.  Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects , 1965 .

[19]  R. Prins,et al.  The effect of glycol on phosphate-doped CoMo/Al2O3 hydrotreating catalysts , 2005 .

[20]  Georg Kresse,et al.  Shape and Edge Sites Modifications of MoS2 Catalytic Nanoparticles Induced by Working Conditions: A Theoretical Study , 2002 .

[21]  V. Harlé,et al.  Molybdocobaltate cobalt salts: New starting materials for hydrotreating catalysts , 2007 .

[22]  G. Kresse,et al.  Ab initio study of the H2-H2S/MoS2 gas-solid interface : The nature of the catalytically active sites , 2000 .

[23]  P. Raybaud,et al.  Promoter Sensitive Shapes of Co(Ni)MoS Nanocatalysts in Sulfo-Reductive Conditions , 2002 .

[24]  Bernard Silvi,et al.  A DFT study of the origin of the HDS/HydO selectivity on Co(Ni)MoS active phases , 2008 .

[25]  D. C. Koningsberger,et al.  Structure and Nature of the Active Sites in CoMo Hydrotreating Catalysts: An EXAFS Study of the Reaction with Selenophene , 1997 .

[26]  G. Kresse,et al.  From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method , 1999 .

[27]  M. Che,et al.  Ligand-Promoted Alumina Dissolution in the Preparation of MoOX/γ-Al2O3 Catalysts: Evidence for the Formation and Deposition of an Anderson-type Alumino Heteropolymolybdate , 1997 .

[28]  A. Noskov,et al.  Activity and sulfidation behavior of the CoMo/Al2O3 hydrotreating catalyst: The effect of drying conditions , 2010 .

[29]  H. Toulhoat,et al.  Low-temperature synthesis of mixed NiMo sulfides: structural, textural and catalytic properties , 1986 .

[30]  R. Prins,et al.  The Influence of Chelating Ligands on the Sulfidation of Ni and Mo in NiMo/SiO2Hydrotreating Catalysts , 1996 .

[31]  F. L. Deepak,et al.  Direct Imaging and Identification of Individual Dopant Atoms in MoS2 and WS2 Catalysts by Aberration Corrected Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy , 2011 .

[32]  J. Niemantsverdriet,et al.  Correlation between Hydrodesulfurization Activity and Order of Ni and Mo Sulfidation in Planar Silica-Supported NiMo Catalysts: The Influence of Chelating Agents , 2001 .

[33]  B. A. Bennett,et al.  Structure and HDS Activity of Co‐Mo Catalysts: A Comparison Of Alumina and Carbon Supports , 2010 .

[34]  Herve Toulhoat,et al.  A density functional theory comparison of anatase (TiO2)- and γ-Al2O3-supported MoS2 catalysts , 2005 .

[35]  C. Geantet,et al.  Compensation effect and volcano curve in toluene hydrogenation catalyzed by transition metal sulfides. , 2010, Dalton transactions.

[36]  Pascal Raybaud,et al.  Understanding and predicting improved sulfide catalysts: Insights from first principles modeling , 2007 .

[37]  J. Ancheyta,et al.  Support effects in CoMo hydrodesulfurization catalysts prepared with EDTA as a chelating agent , 2007 .

[38]  A. Stanislaus,et al.  Temperature programmed reduction of SiO2–Al2O3 supported Ni, Mo and NiMo catalysts prepared with EDTA , 2011 .

[39]  Yunqi Liu,et al.  Study on the structure of active phase in NiMoP impregnation solution using Laser Raman spectroscopy II. Effect of organic additives , 2011 .

[40]  M. A. Cortés,et al.  Enhanced dibenzothiophene desulfurization over NiMo catalysts simultaneously impregnated with saccharose , 2010 .

[41]  P. Raybaud,et al.  Mixed sites and promoter segregation: A DFT study of the manifestation of Le Chatelier's principle for the Co(Ni)MoS active phase in reaction conditions , 2008 .

[42]  J. Niemantsverdriet,et al.  On the formation of cobalt–molybdenum sulfides in silica‐supported hydrotreating model catalysts , 2000 .

[43]  R. Prins,et al.  Exafs study of the local structure of Ni in Ni-MoS2/C hydrodesulfurization catalysts , 1990 .

[44]  C. Geantet,et al.  New insights into the role of glycol-based additives in the improvement of hydrotreatment catalyst performances , 2008 .

[45]  H. Toulhoat,et al.  A geometrical model of the active phase of hydrotreating catalysts , 1984 .

[46]  P. Mazoyer,et al.  In Situ EXAFS Study of the Sulfidation of an Hydrotreating Catalyst Doped with a Non Chelating Organic Additive , 2005 .

[47]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Edge termination of MoS2 and CoMoS catalyst particles , 2000 .

[48]  Christophe Geantet,et al.  Effect of glycol on the formation of active species and sulfidation mechanism of CoMoP/Al2O3 hydrotreating catalysts , 2011 .

[49]  H. Toulhoat,et al.  Nature of the different nickel species in sulfided bulk and alumina-supported NiMo hydrotreating catalysts , 1989 .

[50]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Hydrodesulfurization reaction pathways on MoS2 nanoclusters revealed by scanning tunneling microscopy , 2004 .

[51]  P. Hohenberg,et al.  Inhomogeneous Electron Gas , 1964 .

[52]  D. Guillaume,et al.  X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Surface Quantification of Sulfided CoMoP Catalysts – Relation Between Activity and Promoted Sites – Part I: Influence of the Co/Mo Ratio , 2007 .

[53]  岩本 隆一郎,et al.  CoO-MoO3/Al2O3系水素化脱硫触媒へのポリエチレングリコール添加効果 , 2005 .

[54]  D. Guillaume,et al.  X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy surface quantification of sulfided CoMoP catalysts. Relation between activity and promoted sites. Part II: Influence of the sulfidation temperature , 2006 .

[55]  C. Geantet,et al.  Dual Effect of H2S on Volcano Curves in Hydrotreating Sulfide Catalysis , 2006 .

[56]  Wang,et al.  Accurate and simple analytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy. , 1992, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.