Home automation in the wild: challenges and opportunities

Visions of smart homes have long caught the attention of researchers and considerable effort has been put toward enabling home automation. However, these technologies have not been widely adopted despite being available for over three decades. To gain insight into this state of affairs, we conducted semi-structured home visits to 14 households with home automation. The long term experience, both positive and negative, of the households we interviewed illustrates four barriers that need to be addressed before home automation becomes amenable to broader adoption. These barriers are high cost of ownership, inflexibility, poor manageability, and difficulty achieving security. Our findings also provide several directions for further research, which include eliminating the need for structural changes for installing home automation, providing users with simple security primitives that they can confidently configure, and enabling composition of home devices.

[1]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  Providing an Integrated User Experience of Networked Media, Devices, and Services through End-User Composition , 2009, Pervasive.

[2]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[3]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  Sabbath day home automation: "it's like mixing technology and religion" , 2007, CHI.

[4]  Steve Benford,et al.  The ins and outs of home networking: The case for useful and usable domestic networking , 2009, TCHI.

[5]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  The Work to Make a Home Network Work , 2005, ECSCW.

[6]  Lujo Bauer,et al.  A user study of policy creation in a flexible access-control system , 2008, CHI.

[7]  Lynne Hamill,et al.  Controlling Smart Devices in the Home , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[8]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  The domestic economy: a broader unit of analysis for end user programming , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[9]  Lujo Bauer,et al.  Access Control for Home Data Sharing: Attitudes, Needs and Practices , 2010, CHI 2010.

[10]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  Using speakeasy for ad hoc peer-to-peer collaboration , 2002, CSCW '02.

[11]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  At Home with Ubiquitous Computing: Seven Challenges , 2001, UbiComp.

[12]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  Home networking and HCI: what hath god wrought? , 2007, CHI.

[13]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  The Georgia Tech aware home , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  J. Gerring.  A case study , 2011, Technology and Society.

[15]  Stefan Rennick Egglestone,et al.  Digital plumbing: the mundane work of deploying UbiComp in the home , 2010, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[16]  Barry Brumitt,et al.  EasyLiving: Technologies for Intelligent Environments , 2000, HUC.

[17]  Stefan Saroiu,et al.  The home needs an operating system (and an app store) , 2010, Hotnets-IX.

[18]  Steve Benford,et al.  Making the Home Network at Home: Digital Housekeeping , 2007, ECSCW.

[19]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Principles of Smart Home Control , 2006, UbiComp.

[20]  Stephen S. Intille,et al.  Designing a Home of the Future , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[21]  Rebecca E. Grinter,et al.  How Smart Homes Learn: The Evolution of the Networked Home and Household , 2007, UbiComp.

[22]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  More than meets the eye: transforming the user experience of home network management , 2008, DIS '08.

[23]  D. Randall.  Living Inside a Smart Home: A Case Study , 2003 .

[24]  Genevieve Bell,et al.  Designing Technology for Domestic Spaces: A Kitchen Manifesto , 2002 .

[25]  Kaisa Väänänen,et al.  Evolution towards smart home environments: empirical evaluation of three user interfaces , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[26]  James Newsome,et al.  Challenges in Access Right Assignment for Secure Home Networks , 2010, HotSec.

[27]  Richard Harper,et al.  Inside the Smart Home , 2003, Springer London.

[28]  Alain Karsenty,et al.  Unremarkable computing , 2002, CHI.

[29]  Steve Benford,et al.  The evolution of buildings and implications for the design of ubiquitous domestic environments , 2003, CHI '03.