Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Factors Contributing to the Longitudinal Identification of Successful Older Adults in the Betula Study

ABSTRACT Studies of successful aging have typically defined elderly who fall in the upper end of a distribution of test scores as successful. A different definition of successful aging requires that older adults fall at or above the mean level of younger adults and maintain this level over time. Here we examined this definition of successful aging in a sample of 1463 individuals between the ages of 50 of 85. Based on principal coordinate analysis of cognitive and non-cognitive variables, we identified a group of 55 (8.3%) 70–85 years olds that were high functioning. This group of elderly showed elevated performance on a range of cognitive tasks. Non-cognitive factors that characterized this group included education and subjective health. The participants were retested 5 years later and the same type of analysis was repeated. Of the remaining individuals who initially were classified as high functioning, 18 (35%) remained high functioning and thus met the definition for successful aging. Years of education was a significant predictor of who remained successful over time.

[1]  E. Budtz-Jørgensen,et al.  Successful aging--the case for prosthetic therapy. , 2000, Journal of public health dentistry.

[2]  L. Nyberg,et al.  The betula prospective cohort study: Memory, health, and aging , 1997 .

[3]  J. Rowe,et al.  Human aging: usual and successful. , 1987, Science.

[4]  M. Albert,et al.  Cognitive performance in a high-functioning community-dwelling elderly population. , 1993, Journal of gerontology.

[5]  R. Dixon,et al.  Selective adult age differences in an age-invariant multifactor model of declarative memory. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[6]  G. Andrews,et al.  Successful Aging in the Australian Longitudinal Study of Aging: Applying the MacArthur Model Cross–Nationally , 2002 .

[7]  E. Phelan,et al.  “Successful Aging”—Where Next? , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[8]  J. Rowe,et al.  Successful aging. , 1998, Aging.

[9]  L. Nyberg,et al.  Betula: A Prospective Cohort Study on Memory, Health and Aging , 2004 .

[10]  K. Jöreskog,et al.  Applied Factor Analysis in the Natural Sciences. , 1997 .

[11]  H. Kiyak,et al.  Successful aging: implications for oral health. , 2000, Journal of public health dentistry.

[12]  John Imbrie,et al.  FACTOR AND VECTOR ANALYSIS PROGRAMS FOR ANALYZING GEOLOGIC DATA , 1963 .

[13]  D. Knook,et al.  Successful aging in the oldest old: Who can be characterized as successfully aged? , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  Erika Kobayashi,et al.  Changes in functional status among older adults in Japan: successful and usual aging. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[15]  W. STEPHENSON,et al.  Technique of Factor Analysis , 1935, Nature.

[16]  T. Erkinjuntti,et al.  Heterogeneity of congnitive profiles in aging: successful aging, normal aging, and individuals at risks for cognitive decline , 1999 .

[17]  L Nyberg,et al.  Age differences in episodic memory, semantic memory, and priming: relationships to demographic, intellectual, and biological factors. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[18]  M. Albert,et al.  Predictors of cognitive change in older persons: MacArthur studies of successful aging. , 1995, Psychology and aging.