A Bibliometric Analysis of Objective and Subjective Risk

In relation to “objective risk” or “subjective risk”, a bibliometric analysis was performed using documents found in the Scopus database. A search for related documents was narrowed down to 192 documents and these were considered in this study. The results of this study suggest that the use of the ranking method and descriptive statistics is not sufficient in presenting a concise bibliometric analysis. To create a more in-depth bibliometric analysis, the results of this study have to be analyzed together with a visualization map using VOSviewer software. This way, researchers can easily locate a specific gap in the literature, understand the relation between the papers on the same subject, and cite the literature studies based on their effectiveness.

[1]  Zhengtao Li,et al.  To what extent does air pollution affect happiness? The case of the Jinchuan mining area, China , 2014 .

[2]  J. Martins,et al.  Risks and Opportunities for Reforming Construction with Blockchain: Bibliometric Study , 2020 .

[3]  Raymond Bisdorff.  On Clustering the Criteria in an Outranking Based Decision Aid Approach , 2008, MCO.

[4]  Jia Zeng,et al.  Field independent probabilistic model for clustering multi-field documents , 2009, Inf. Process. Manag..

[5]  C. Acerbi.  Spectral measures of risk: A coherent representation of subjective risk aversion , 2002 .

[6]  S. Shackford,et al.  Intra-abdominal injury following blunt trauma. Identifying the high-risk patient using objective risk factors. , 1989, Archives of surgery.

[7]  F A Haight,et al.  Risk, especially risk of traffic accident. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  N. Brewer,et al.  Subjective and objective risk as predictors of influenza vaccination during the vaccine shortage of 2004-2005. , 2006, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[9]  E. Hofman,et al.  A bibliometric review of the innovation adoption literature , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[10]  M. Brand,et al.  Simultaneous motor demands affect decision making under objective risk , 2018 .

[11]  Régis Delafenestre,et al.  New business models in supply chains: a bibliometric study , 2019 .

[12]  C. Searcy,et al.  Zeitgeist or chameleon? A quantitative analysis of CSR definitions , 2016 .

[13]  Qidan Zhu,et al.  Automatic flight control design considering objective and subjective risks during carrier landing , 2020, J. Syst. Control. Eng..

[14]  Adèle Paul-Hus,et al.  The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis , 2015, Scientometrics.

[15]  F. Izzo,et al.  Gaming for Healthcare: A Bibliometric Analysis in Business and Management , 2020 .

[16]  L Sjöberg,et al.  Knowledge and risk perception among nuclear power plant employees. , 1991, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  A. Rodríguez-García,et al.  Bullying among Teens: Are Ethnicity and Race Risk Factors for Victimization? A Bibliometric Research , 2019, Education Sciences.

[18]  William D. Rowe,et al.  Methodology and Myth , 1981 .

[19]  Haitham Nobanee,et al.  A Bibliometric Review of Big Data in Finance , 2021, Big Data.

[20]  Boris Tartakovsky,et al.  Bibliometric analysis of global research trends on microbial fuel cells using Scopus database , 2018, Biochemical Engineering Journal.

[21]  Johannes Schiebener,et al.  Decision Making Under Objective Risk Conditions–a Review of Cognitive and Emotional Correlates, Strategies, Feedback Processing, and External Influences , 2015, Neuropsychology Review.

[22]  Qiang Wang,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of research on the risk of engineering nanomaterials during 1999-2012. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  Haitham Nobanee,et al.  Big Data in Business: A Bibliometric Analysis of Relevant Literature , 2020, Big Data.

[24]  Pedro Senna,et al.  Data mining and operations research techniques in Supply Chain Risk Management: A bibliometric study , 2020 .

[25]  G. Harrison,et al.  Estimating subjective probabilities , 2014, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.

[26]  Mood and the subjective risk of future events , 1993 .

[27]  A bibliometric analysis of cash holdings literature: current status, development, and agenda for future research , 2021, Management Review Quarterly.

[28]  Heikki Summala,et al.  RISK CONTROL IS NOT RISK ADJUSTMENT: THE ZERO-RISK THEORY OF DRIVER BEHAVIOUR AND ITS IMPLICATIONS , 1988 .

[29]  Md. Tanjin Amin,et al.  A bibliometric review of process safety and risk analysis , 2019, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[30]  Rul von Stülpnagel,et al.  Crash risk and subjective risk perception during urban cycling: Evidence for congruent and incongruent sources. , 2020, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  Jantsje M. Mol,et al.  Insights into Flood Risk Misperceptions of Homeowners in the Dutch River Delta , 2020, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[32]  Philipp Korom,et al.  A bibliometric visualization of the economics and sociology of wealth inequality: a world apart? , 2019, Scientometrics.

[33]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[34]  K. Malterud,et al.  Shifting attention from objective risk factors to patients' self-assessed health resources: a clinical model for general practice. , 1995, Family practice.

[35]  A. Díez-Herrero,et al.  Flood Risk Analysis and Assessment, Applications and Uncertainties: A Bibliometric Review , 2020 .

[36]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Risk: objective or subjective, facts or values , 2010 .

[37]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  Defining and identifying communities in networks. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Salman Bahoo.  Corruption in banks: A bibliometric review and agenda , 2020 .

[39]  A. Brem,et al.  User Experience (UX) in Business, Management, and Psychology: A Bibliometric Mapping of the Current State of Research , 2020, Multimodal Technol. Interact..

[40]  H. Chong,et al.  A Bibliometric Review on Risk Management and Building Information Modeling for International Construction , 2018 .

[41]  David B. Houston,et al.  Risk, Insurance, and Sampling , 1964 .

[42]  Daniela Knuth,et al.  Risk Perception, Experience, and Objective Risk: A Cross‐National Study with European Emergency Survivors , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[43]  S. West,et al.  Beyond medical risk: investigating the psychological factors underlying women's perceptions of susceptibility to breast cancer, heart disease, and osteoporosis. , 2004, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[44]  V. Ratten,et al.  A systematic review of women's entrepreneurship and internationalization literature , 2019, Thunderbird International Business Review.

[45]  Manfred J. Schmitt,et al.  Convergence of Direct, Indirect, and Objective Risk-Taking Measures in Gambling , 2010 .

[46]  Adeli Beatriz Braun,et al.  Sustainable remediation through the risk management perspective and stakeholder involvement: A systematic and bibliometric view of the literature. , 2019, Environmental pollution.

[47]  S. West,et al.  Perceived determinants of risk for breast cancer and the relations among objective risk, perceived risk, and screening behavior over time. , 1995, Women's health.

[48]  J. A. Carrillo-Castrillo,et al.  Musculoskeletal Risks: RULA Bibliometric Review , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[49]  B. Rimer,et al.  Relationships among objective and subjective risk for breast cancer and mammography stages of change. , 1996, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[50]  R Shepherd,et al.  Methodological Approaches to Assessing Risk Perceptions Associated with Food‐Related Hazards , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[51]  Matthew R. Groves,et al.  Critical mountaineering decisions: technology, expertise and subjective risk in adventurous leisure , 2020 .

[52]  R. Scarpa,et al.  Perceived risks of mountain landslides in Italy: stated choices for subjective risk reductions , 2017, Landslides.

[53]  N. K. Sinha,et al.  Total Risk and Reliability with Human Factors , 2006 .

[54]  Juan Chen,et al.  A multi-objective risk management model for real-time flood control optimal operation of a parallel reservoir system , 2020 .

[55]  Lipan Feng,et al.  Disruption risks in supply chain management: a literature review based on bibliometric analysis , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[56]  Peng Chen,et al.  Subjective and Objective Risk Tolerance: Implications for Optimal Portfolios , 1998 .

[57]  F. Goerlandt,et al.  Arctic shipping risk management: A bibliometric analysis and a systematic review of risk influencing factors of navigational accidents , 2021, Safety Science.

[58]  Adler Diniz de Souza,et al.  Risk Management in Scrum Projects: A Bibliometric Study , 2017 .

[59]  Aslan Amat Senin,et al.  BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS TREND ON BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION , 2020 .

[60]  Beihai Zhou,et al.  Bibliometric overview of research trends on heavy metal health risks and impacts in 1989–2018 , 2020 .

[61]  Haitham Nobanee,et al.  A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainability and Risk Management , 2021 .

[62]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.

[63]  Agata Lulewicz-Sas.  Corporate Social Responsibility in the Light of Management Science – Bibliometric Analysis , 2017 .