The duality of gaze: eyes extract and signal social information during sustained cooperative and competitive dyadic gaze

In contrast to non-human primate eyes, which have a dark sclera surrounding a dark iris, human eyes have a white sclera that surrounds a dark iris. This high contrast morphology allows humans to determine quickly and easily where others are looking and infer what they are attending to. In recent years an enormous body of work has used photos and schematic images of faces to study these aspects of social attention, e.g., the selection of the eyes of others and the shift of attention to where those eyes are directed. However, evolutionary theory holds that humans did not develop a high contrast morphology simply to use the eyes of others as attentional cues; rather they sacrificed camouflage for communication, that is, to signal their thoughts and intentions to others. In the present study we demonstrate the importance of this by taking as our starting point the hypothesis that a cornerstone of non-verbal communication is the eye contact between individuals and the time that it is held. In a single simple study we show experimentally that the effect of eye contact can be quickly and profoundly altered merely by having participants, who had never met before, play a game in a cooperative or competitive manner. After the game participants were asked to make eye contact for a prolonged period of time (10 min). Those who had played the game cooperatively found this terribly difficult to do, repeatedly talking and breaking gaze. In contrast, those who had played the game competitively were able to stare quietly at each other for a sustained period. Collectively these data demonstrate that when looking at the eyes of a real person one both acquires and signals information to the other person. This duality of gaze is critical to non-verbal communication, with the nature of that communication shaped by the relationship between individuals, e.g., cooperative or competitive.

[1]  Jari K. Hietanen,et al.  Eye contact with neutral and smiling faces: effects on autonomic responses and frontal EEG asymmetry , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[2]  Massimo Turatto,et al.  Is there a direct link between gaze perception and joint attention behaviours? Effects of gaze contrast polarity on oculomotor behaviour , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  T. Foulsham,et al.  The where, what and when of gaze allocation in the lab and the natural environment , 2011, Vision Research.

[4]  Simon Garnier,et al.  Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  J. Hietanen,et al.  The dual nature of eye contact: to see and to be seen. , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[6]  R. Exline,et al.  VISUAL BEHAVIOR IN A DYAD AS AFFECTED BY INTERVIEW CONTENT AND SEX OF RESPONDENT. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Is There a "Language of the Eyes"? Evidence from Normal Adults, and Adults with Autism or Asperger Syndrome , 1997 .

[8]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Attention, Researchers! It Is Time to Take a Look at the Real World , 2003 .

[9]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Natural gaze signaling in a social context , 2014 .

[10]  M. Argyle,et al.  The Different Functions of Gaze , 1973 .

[11]  T. Foulsham,et al.  Speaking and Listening with the Eyes: Gaze Signaling during Dyadic Interactions , 2015, PloS one.

[12]  William M. Timmons,et al.  Speaking and Listening , 1945 .

[13]  Tom Foulsham,et al.  What Affects Social Attention? Social Presence, Eye Contact and Autistic Traits , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Looking while eating: The importance of social context to social attention , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  The dual function of social gaze , 2015, Cognition.

[16]  Z. Rubin Measurement of romantic love. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Kaitlin E W Laidlaw,et al.  Potential social interactions are important to social attention , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Speaking and listening , 2009 .

[19]  J. Laird,et al.  Looking and loving: The effects of mutual gaze on feelings of romantic love. , 1989 .

[20]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Gaze Perception Triggers Reflexive Visuospatial Orienting , 1999 .

[21]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[22]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Cognitive Ethology: a new approach for studying human cognition. , 2008, British journal of psychology.

[23]  Tom Foulsham,et al.  Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Hiromitsu Kobayashi,et al.  Unique morphology of the human eye , 1997, Nature.

[25]  Tom Foulsham,et al.  Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: Effects of social status and speaking , 2010, Cognition.

[26]  Evan F. Risko,et al.  Social attention with real versus reel stimuli: toward an empirical approach to concerns about ecological validity , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  J. Hietanen,et al.  Does facial expression affect attention orienting by gaze direction cues? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .