Biomass cofiring impacts on flame structure and emissions

Abstract The impacts of cofiring biomass and coal on flame structure and NO emissions are investigated in the context of a swirl-stabilized, pilot-scale burner with straw and coal fired independently. The comparatively low energy density of biomass generally leads to higher transport air requirements per unit energy, increasing the momentum of biomass streams relative to an energy equivalent coal stream in burner feeds. Increasing the primary momentum in this manner alters the flow field and stoichiometry patterns of the burner. Detailed species concentration measurements as well as particle sampling were employed to investigate the flame structures of both high and low straw primary air flowrates. Large straw particles penetrate the internal recirculation zone at the high primary air flowrate, elongating the flame structure by forming fuel-rich eddies. The knees (relatively dense sections of straw) of the straw penetrated much further into the reactor, forming a secondary combustion zone. The NO emission was seen to decrease as the straw primary air flowrate increased because of increased numbers of fuel-rich eddies providing more reducing zone, where the fuel nitrogen from the large particles was released. It is also shown that the fuel-rich eddies served as reburning and/or advanced reburning centers, reducing the effluent NO emission further.

[1]  F. Lockwood,et al.  Combustion measurements in a pulverised coal-fired furnace , 1988 .

[2]  F. Winter,et al.  Pyrolysis of poly-L-leucine under combustion-like conditions , 2003 .

[3]  T. Mahmud,et al.  Detailed measurements in and modelling of an industry-type pulverised-coal flame , 1991 .

[4]  J. P. Smart,et al.  Studies on scale-up of swirl-stabilised pulverised-coal burners in the thermal input range 2.5-12 MW , 1996 .

[5]  B. J. Visser,et al.  Reduction of NOx emissions in a swirled coal flame by particle injection into the internal recirculation zone , 1989 .

[6]  A. Jensen,et al.  Fuel nitrogen conversion in solid fuel fired systems , 2003 .

[7]  L. Pickett,et al.  In-Situ Species, Temperature and Velocity Measurements in a Pulverized Coal Flame , 1999 .

[8]  David A. Tillman,et al.  Biomass cofiring : status and prospects 1996 , 1998 .

[9]  F. Lockwood,et al.  The Effect of the Near Burner Aerodynamics on Pollution, Stability and Combustion in a PF-Fired Furnace , 1993 .

[10]  F. C. Lockwood,et al.  The influence of near burner region aerodynamics on the formation and emission of nitrogen oxides in a pulverized coal-fired furnace , 1992 .

[11]  D. W. Pershing,et al.  Pulverized coal combustion: NOx formation mechanisms under fuel rich and staged combustion conditions , 1979 .

[12]  M. Kaess,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigation of NOx Formation and its Basic Interdependences on Pulverized Coal Flame Characteristics , 1993 .

[13]  Klaus R. G. Hein,et al.  EU clean coal technology—co-combustion of coal and biomass , 1998 .

[14]  F. Lockwood,et al.  The effect of particle size on NO formation in a large-scale pulverized coal-fired laboratory furnace: Measurements and modeling , 1993 .

[15]  Margaret S. Wooldridge,et al.  Co-firing of coal and biomass fuel blends , 2001 .

[16]  Javier Ballester,et al.  Comparative study of semi-industrial-scale flames of pulverized coals and biomass , 2005 .

[17]  F. Lockwood,et al.  Measurements in a Cylindrical Pulverized Coal Furnace. Influence of Swirl Number on Combustion Performance , 1989 .

[18]  F. C. Lockwood,et al.  The influence of burner injection mode on pulverized coal and biomass co-fired flames , 1994 .

[19]  Klaus R. G. Hein,et al.  Effect of co-combustion of biomass on emissions in pulverized fuel furnaces , 1998 .

[20]  L. Baxter Biomass-coal co-combustion: opportunity for affordable renewable energy , 2005 .