In vitro methods to study bubble-cell interactions: Fundamentals and therapeutic applications.

Besides their use as contrast agents for ultrasound imaging, microbubbles are increasingly studied for a wide range of therapeutic applications. In particular, their ability to enhance the uptake of drugs through the permeabilization of tissues and cell membranes shows great promise. In order to fully understand the numerous paths by which bubbles can interact with cells and the even larger number of possible biological responses from the cells, thorough and extensive work is necessary. In this review, we consider the range of experimental techniques implemented in in vitro studies with the aim of elucidating these microbubble-cell interactions. First of all, the variety of cell types and cell models available are discussed, emphasizing the need for more and more complex models replicating in vivo conditions together with experimental challenges associated with this increased complexity. Second, the different types of stabilized microbubbles and more recently developed droplets and particles are presented, followed by their acoustic or optical excitation methods. Finally, the techniques exploited to study the microbubble-cell interactions are reviewed. These techniques operate over a wide range of timescales, or even off-line, revealing particular aspects or subsequent effects of these interactions. Therefore, knowledge obtained from several techniques must be combined to elucidate the underlying processes.

[1]  E. Stride,et al.  Laser-driven resonance of dye-doped oil-coated microbubbles: Experimental study. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  J. Pacella,et al.  Fluid Viscosity Affects the Fragmentation and Inertial Cavitation Threshold of Lipid-Encapsulated Microbubbles. , 2016, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  D. Fernández Rivas,et al.  Measuring cavitation and its cleaning effect. , 2016, Ultrasonics sonochemistry.

[4]  Flavie Braud,et al.  Development of a real-time flexible multiphoton microendoscope for label-free imaging in a live animal , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[5]  E. Johnsen,et al.  Bubble dynamics in soft materials: Viscoelastic and thermal effects , 2015 .

[6]  Thomas Hankemeier,et al.  Microfluidic 3D cell culture: from tools to tissue models. , 2015, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[7]  N. Jong,et al.  Bubble-cell interactions with laser-activated polymeric microcapsules , 2015 .

[8]  M. Wan,et al.  Apoptosis Induced by Microbubble-Assisted Acoustic Cavitation in K562 Cells: The Predominant Role of the Cyclosporin A-Dependent Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  Kenneth Hoyt,et al.  Ultrasound imaging of breast tumor perfusion and neovascular morphology. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  S. Chung,et al.  Streaming flow from ultrasound contrast agents by acoustic waves in a blood vessel model. , 2015, Ultrasonics.

[11]  Lotfi Abou-Elkacem,et al.  Ultrasound molecular imaging: Moving toward clinical translation. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[12]  V. Garbin,et al.  Selective flow-induced vesicle rupture to sort by membrane mechanical properties , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Martin Wiklund,et al.  Ultrasonic three-dimensional on-chip cell culture for dynamic studies of tumor immune surveillance by natural killer cells. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[14]  A. Borowsky,et al.  Ultrasound molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis with a neuropilin-1-targeted microbubble. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[15]  T. Kodama,et al.  Delivery of molecules to the lymph node via lymphatic vessels using ultrasound and nano/microbubbles. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Non-linear response and viscoelastic properties of lipid-coated microbubbles: DSPC versus DPPC. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  M. Borden,et al.  Thermal activation of superheated lipid-coated perfluorocarbon drops. , 2015, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[18]  J. Wan,et al.  Membrane blebbing as a recovery manoeuvre in site-specific sonoporation mediated by targeted microbubbles , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Impulse response method for characterization of echogenic liposomes. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Paul S. Sheeran,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging and in vivo circulatory kinetics with low-boiling-point nanoscale phase-change perfluorocarbon agents. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  F. Foster,et al.  Subharmonic, non-linear fundamental and ultraharmonic imaging of microbubble contrast at high frequencies. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  E. Johnsen,et al.  Bubble dynamics in a viscoelastic medium with nonlinear elasticity , 2015, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[23]  K. Braeckmans,et al.  Ultrasound and microbubble mediated drug delivery: acoustic pressure as determinant for uptake via membrane pores or endocytosis. , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[24]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Sono-photoacoustic imaging of gold nanoemulsions: Part I. Exposure thresholds , 2015, Photoacoustics.

[25]  N de Jong,et al.  Intravital microscopy of localized stem cell delivery using microbubbles and acoustic radiation force , 2015, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[26]  Sharon Gerecht,et al.  Hydrogels to model 3D in vitro microenvironment of tumor vascularization. , 2014, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[27]  S. D. De Smedt,et al.  The potential of antigen and TriMix sonoporation using mRNA-loaded microbubbles for ultrasound-triggered cancer immunotherapy. , 2014, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[28]  A. Walmsley,et al.  A novel methodology providing insights into removal of biofilm-mimicking hydrogel from lateral morphological features of the root canal during irrigation procedures. , 2014, International endodontic journal.

[29]  D. Ingber,et al.  Microfluidic organs-on-chips , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  Nico De Jong,et al.  Lipid shedding from single oscillating microbubbles. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[31]  S. Ohl,et al.  Microbubble‐mediated sonoporation for highly efficient transfection of recalcitrant human B‐ cell lines , 2014, Biotechnology journal.

[32]  T. Kanda,et al.  An in vitro blood–brain barrier model combining shear stress and endothelial cell/astrocyte co-culture , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[33]  Jacob D. Dove,et al.  Optically induced resonance of nanoparticle-loaded microbubbles. , 2014, Optics letters.

[34]  Yaxin Hu,et al.  Cytomechanical perturbations during low-intensity ultrasound pulsing. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[35]  J. Wan,et al.  Single-site sonoporation disrupts actin cytoskeleton organization , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[36]  Ross Williams,et al.  On the acoustic properties of vaporized submicron perfluorocarbon droplets. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[37]  Lin Xu,et al.  Sonoporation-induced depolarization of plasma membrane potential: analysis of heterogeneous impact. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[38]  A. Yu,et al.  Microbubble-mediated sonoporation amplified lipid peroxidation of Jurkat cells. , 2014, Chemistry and physics of lipids.

[39]  E. Susaki,et al.  Whole-Brain Imaging with Single-Cell Resolution Using Chemical Cocktails and Computational Analysis , 2014, Cell.

[40]  M. Versluis,et al.  Ultrafast vapourization dynamics of laser-activated polymeric microcapsules , 2014, Nature Communications.

[41]  M. Versluis,et al.  Acoustic bubble sorting for ultrasound contrast agent enrichment. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[42]  A. van den Berg,et al.  Microstamped Petri Dishes for Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy Analysis of Arrays of Microtissues , 2014, PloS one.

[43]  Ben Y. C. Leung,et al.  The effect of boundary proximity on the response of individual ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  B. Herpers,et al.  A 3D in vitro model of differentiated HepG2 cell spheroids with improved liver-like properties for repeated dose high-throughput toxicity studies , 2014, Archives of Toxicology.

[45]  Steven C George,et al.  An integrated in vitro model of perfused tumor and cardiac tissue , 2013, Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

[46]  Alfred C H Yu,et al.  Membrane perforation and recovery dynamics in microbubble-mediated sonoporation. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[47]  M. Reiser,et al.  Perfusion characteristics of parotid gland tumors evaluated by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[48]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Flow-focusing regimes for accelerated production of monodisperse drug-loadable microbubbles toward clinical-scale applications. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[49]  Vasan Venugopalan,et al.  Hydrodynamic determinants of cell necrosis and molecular delivery produced by pulsed laser microbeam irradiation of adherent cells. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[50]  D. Lohse,et al.  Acoustic droplet vaporization is initiated by superharmonic focusing , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  E. A. Sykes,et al.  Tumour-on-a-chip provides an optical window into nanoparticle tissue transport , 2013, Nature Communications.

[52]  C. Deng,et al.  Improving ultrasound gene transfection efficiency by controlling ultrasound excitation of microbubbles. , 2013, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[53]  Z. Werb,et al.  Circulating Tumor Cells , 2013, Science.

[54]  N. Jong,et al.  Role of intracellular calcium and reactive oxygen species in microbubble-mediated alterations of endothelial layer permeability , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[55]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Mechanisms of microbubble-vessel interactions and induced stresses: a numerical study. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  E. Young Cells, tissues, and organs on chips: challenges and opportunities for the cancer tumor microenvironment. , 2013, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[57]  Jacob D. Dove,et al.  Enhanced photoacoustic response with plasmonic nanoparticle-templated microbubbles , 2013 .

[58]  Jianping Fu,et al.  Acoustic tweezing cytometry for live-cell subcellular modulation of intracellular cytoskeleton contractility , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[59]  Yu-Hsiang Hsu,et al.  A microfluidic platform for generating large-scale nearly identical human microphysiological vascularized tissue arrays. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[60]  Christopher V. Barback,et al.  Neural progenitor cells labeling with microbubble contrast agent for ultrasound imaging in vivo. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[61]  E. Stride,et al.  A theoretical investigation of photoacoustic contrast agents. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  M. Wheatley,et al.  In vitro gene delivery with ultrasound-triggered polymer microbubbles. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[63]  David S Lawrence,et al.  Measurement of protein tyrosine phosphatase activity in single cells by capillary electrophoresis. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[64]  A. Berg,et al.  Time-resolved high-speed fluorescence imaging of bubble-induced sonoporation. , 2013 .

[65]  E. Underwood Neuroscience. Tissue imaging method makes everything clear. , 2013, Science.

[66]  Aaron S. Andalman,et al.  Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems , 2013, Nature.

[67]  L. O’Driscoll,et al.  Three-dimensional cell culture: the missing link in drug discovery. , 2013, Drug discovery today.

[68]  R. Karshafian,et al.  Enhancing laser thermal-therapy using ultrasound-microbubbles and gold nanorods of in vitro cells. , 2013, Ultrasonics.

[69]  Yu-Hsiang Hsu,et al.  In vitro perfused human capillary networks. , 2013, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[70]  Z. G. Li,et al.  Single cell membrane poration by bubble-induced microjets in a microfluidic chip. , 2013, Lab on a Chip.

[71]  Kapil Pant,et al.  SyM-BBB: a microfluidic Blood Brain Barrier model. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[72]  A. Berg,et al.  BBB ON CHIP: microfluidic platform to mechanically and biochemically modulate blood-brain barrier function , 2013, Biomedical microdevices.

[73]  Lauren L Bischel,et al.  Tubeless microfluidic angiogenesis assay with three-dimensional endothelial-lined microvessels. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[74]  M. Hennerici,et al.  Focal Delivery of AAV2/1-transgenes Into the Rat Brain by Localized Ultrasound-induced BBB Opening , 2013, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids.

[75]  C. Moonen,et al.  Real-Time Assessment of Ultrasound-Mediated Drug Delivery Using Fibered Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy , 2013, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[76]  Erich E Hoover,et al.  Advances in multiphoton microscopy technology , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[77]  S. Takayama,et al.  Opportunities and challenges for use of tumor spheroids as models to test drug delivery and efficacy. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[78]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Acoustical properties of individual liposome-loaded microbubbles. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[79]  Sunil Unnikrishnan,et al.  Microbubbles as ultrasound contrast agents for molecular imaging: preparation and application. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[80]  M. Borden,et al.  Lipid monolayer collapse and microbubble stability. , 2012, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[81]  S. Friedman,et al.  Synergistic effect of microbubble emulsion and sonic or ultrasonic agitation on endodontic biofilm in vitro. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[82]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Brandaris 128 ultra-high-speed imaging facility: 10 years of operation, updates, and enhanced features. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[83]  A. Brayman,et al.  Characteristic microvessel relaxation timescales associated with ultrasound-activated microbubbles. , 2012, Applied physics letters.

[84]  J. Escoffre,et al.  Ultrastructural modifications of cell membranes and organelles induced by sonoporation , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[85]  Paola Nicolussi,et al.  Functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes as ultrasound contrast agents , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[86]  C. Deng,et al.  Spatiotemporally controlled single cell sonoporation , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[87]  Nico de Jong,et al.  In vivo characterization of ultrasound contrast agents: microbubble spectroscopy in a chicken embryo. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[88]  N. Rapoport,et al.  Phase-shift, stimuli-responsive perfluorocarbon nanodroplets for drug delivery to cancer. , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[89]  Holger Gerhardt,et al.  Tissue engineering: Blood vessels on a chip , 2012, Nature.

[90]  D. Lohse,et al.  Localized removal of layers of metal, polymer, or biomaterial by ultrasound cavitation bubbles. , 2012, Biomicrofluidics.

[91]  E. Lukianova-Hleb,et al.  Cell-specific transmembrane injection of molecular cargo with gold nanoparticle-generated transient plasmonic nanobubbles. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[92]  Ying Zheng,et al.  In vitro microvessels for the study of angiogenesis and thrombosis , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[93]  Eleanor Stride,et al.  Magnetic targeting and ultrasound mediated drug delivery: Benefits, limitations and combination , 2012, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[94]  E. Chérin,et al.  Investigating the subharmonic response of individual phospholipid encapsulated microbubbles at high frequencies: a comparative study of five agents. , 2012, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[95]  E. Gelderblom,et al.  Ultra-high-speed fluorescence imaging , 2012 .

[96]  Roman K Truckenmüller,et al.  Tissue deformation spatially modulates VEGF signaling and angiogenesis , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[97]  Tandiono Tandiono,et al.  Sonolysis of Escherichia coli and Pichia pastoris in microfluidics. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[98]  Yun Zhou,et al.  Controlled permeation of cell membrane by single bubble acoustic cavitation. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[99]  Stanislav Emelianov,et al.  Biomedical photoacoustics beyond thermal expansion using triggered nanodroplet vaporization for contrast-enhanced imaging , 2012, Nature Communications.

[100]  R. Vandenbroucke,et al.  mRNA-Lipoplex loaded microbubble contrast agents for ultrasound-assisted transfection of dendritic cells. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[101]  Georg Schmitz,et al.  Analysis of ultrasound fields in cell culture wells for in vitro ultrasound therapy experiments. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[102]  Z. Duan,et al.  Multi-modal strategies for overcoming tumor drug resistance: hypoxia, the Warburg effect, stem cells, and multifunctional nanotechnology. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[103]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Advanced characterization and refinement of poly N-butyl cyanoacrylate microbubbles for ultrasound imaging. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[104]  D. Lohse,et al.  Dynamics of coated microbubbles adherent to a wall. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[105]  A. V. D. van der Steen,et al.  Sonoporation of endothelial cells by vibrating targeted microbubbles. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[106]  Stephen Meairs,et al.  Self-assembled liposome-loaded microbubbles: The missing link for safe and efficient ultrasound triggered drug-delivery. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[107]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Nonspherical shape oscillations of coated microbubbles in contact with a wall. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[108]  N. Jong,et al.  Biodegradable polymeric microcapsules for selective ultrasound-triggered drug release , 2011 .

[109]  Nancy L Allbritton,et al.  Continuous analysis of dye-loaded, single cells on a microfluidic chip. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[110]  Chrit T. W. Moonen,et al.  Evaluation of the Temporal Window for Drug Delivery Following Ultrasound-Mediated Membrane Permeability Enhancement , 2011, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[111]  P. Marmottant,et al.  Buckling resistance of solid shell bubbles under ultrasound. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[112]  J. Willmann,et al.  Tumor angiogenic marker expression levels during tumor growth: longitudinal assessment with molecularly targeted microbubbles and US imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[113]  Claus-Dieter Ohl,et al.  Red blood cell rheology using single controlled laser-induced cavitation bubbles. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[114]  D. Lohse,et al.  High-speed fluorescence imaging of bubble-induced sonoporation , 2011 .

[115]  Cheri X Deng,et al.  Effects of shear stress cultivation on cell membrane disruption and intracellular calcium concentration in sonoporation of endothelial cells. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[116]  S. D. De Smedt,et al.  Tumor cell killing efficiency of doxorubicin loaded microbubbles after ultrasound exposure. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[117]  Raffi Karshafian,et al.  Microbubble mediated sonoporation of cells in suspension: clonogenic viability and influence of molecular size on uptake. , 2010, Ultrasonics.

[118]  S. Homma,et al.  Effect of microbubble size on fundamental mode high frequency ultrasound imaging in mice. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[119]  Joshua D. Hutcheson,et al.  Saving cells from ultrasound-induced apoptosis: quantification of cell death and uptake following sonication and effects of targeted calcium chelation. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[120]  Martin O Culjat,et al.  A review of tissue substitutes for ultrasound imaging. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[121]  Tri Giang Phan,et al.  Practical intravital two‐photon microscopy for immunological research: faster, brighter, deeper , 2010, Immunology and cell biology.

[122]  Séverine Le Gac,et al.  Single cells as experimentation units in lab-on-a-chip devices , 2010 .

[123]  Ick Chan Kwon,et al.  Nanobubbles from gas-generating polymeric nanoparticles: ultrasound imaging of living subjects. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[124]  Nobuki Kudo,et al.  Modulation control over ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: evaluating the importance of standing waves. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[125]  Jonathan R Lindner,et al.  Contrast ultrasound molecular imaging of inflammation in cardiovascular disease. , 2009, Cardiovascular research.

[126]  D. Cojoc,et al.  History force on coated microbubbles propelled by ultrasound , 2009 .

[127]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-embedded encapsulated microbubbles as dual contrast agents of magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[128]  Katsuyuki Yamamoto,et al.  Sonoporation by single-shot pulsed ultrasound with microbubbles adjacent to cells. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[129]  W. Shi,et al.  Effect of molecular weight, crystallinity, and hydrophobicity on the acoustic activation of polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents. , 2009, Biomacromolecules.

[130]  B. D. Meijering Ultrasound and microbubble targeted delivery. Exploring the mechanism and its therapeutic potential , 2004 .

[131]  E Stride,et al.  Preparation of suspensions of phospholipid-coated microbubbles by coaxial electrohydrodynamic atomization , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[132]  D. Sabens,et al.  Spatiotemporal effects of sonoporation measured by real-time calcium imaging. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[133]  Chris Harvey,et al.  Clinical uses of microbubbles in diagnosis and treatment , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[134]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Oil-filled polymer microcapsules for ultrasound-mediated delivery of lipophilic drugs. , 2009, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[135]  Yun Zhou,et al.  The size of sonoporation pores on the cell membrane , 2008, 2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[136]  D. Stickler,et al.  Bacterial biofilms in patients with indwelling urinary catheters , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Urology.

[137]  Claus-Dieter Ohl,et al.  Laser-induced cavitation based micropump. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[138]  D. McPherson,et al.  A method to co-encapsulate gas and drugs in liposomes for ultrasound-controlled drug delivery. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[139]  Douglas A Christensen,et al.  Drug-loaded nano/microbubbles for combining ultrasonography and targeted chemotherapy. , 2008, Ultrasonics.

[140]  Philippe Marmottant,et al.  Deformation and rupture of lipid vesicles in the strong shear flow generated by ultrasound-driven microbubbles , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[141]  Elisa E Konofagou,et al.  Noninvasive and Transient Blood-Brain Barrier Opening in the Hippocampus of Alzheimer's Double Transgenic Mice Using Focused Ultrasound , 2008, Ultrasonic imaging.

[142]  Vasan Venugopalan,et al.  Examination of laser microbeam cell lysis in a PDMS microfluidic channel using time-resolved imaging. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[143]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Phospholipids-based microbubbles sonoporation pore size and reseal of cell membrane cultured in vitro , 2008 .

[144]  Jonathan A. Kopechek,et al.  Synthesis, Acoustic Stability, and Pharmacologic Activities of Papaverine-Loaded Echogenic Liposomes for Ultrasound Controlled Drug Delivery , 2008, Journal of liposome research.

[145]  Claus-Dieter Ohl,et al.  Sonoporation of suspension cells with a single cavitation bubble in a microfluidic confinement. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[146]  N. de Jong,et al.  P2A-3 High Frequency Attenuation and Size Distribution Measurements of Definity and Manipulated Definity Populations , 2006, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[147]  Zhong-gao Gao,et al.  Multifunctional nanoparticles for combining ultrasonic tumor imaging and targeted chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[148]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Efficient formation of uniform-sized embryoid bodies using a compartmentalized microchannel device. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[149]  C. Holland,et al.  Destruction thresholds of echogenic liposomes with clinical diagnostic ultrasound. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[150]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  On-chip generation of microbubbles as a practical technology for manufacturing contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[151]  Dan Cojoc,et al.  Changes in microbubble dynamics near a boundary revealed by combined optical micromanipulation and high-speed imaging , 2007 .

[152]  Eric Tom,et al.  Myocardial Ischemic Memory Imaging With Molecular Echocardiography , 2007, Circulation.

[153]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[154]  Pai-Chi Li,et al.  Quantitative relations of acoustic inertial cavitation with sonoporation and cell viability. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[155]  S. Acton,et al.  Targeted ultrasound contrast agent for molecular imaging of inflammation in high-shear flow. , 2006, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[156]  Flemming Forsberg,et al.  Comparison of in vitro and in vivo acoustic response of a novel 50:50 PLGA contrast agent. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[157]  W. Pitt,et al.  Dynamic removal of oral biofilms by bubbles. , 2006, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[158]  Mark R Prausnitz,et al.  Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[159]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[160]  C. Visser,et al.  Transient permeabilization of cell membranes by ultrasound-exposed microbubbles is related to formation of hydrogen peroxide. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[161]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Ultrasound radiation force enables targeted deposition of model drug carriers loaded on microbubbles. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[162]  Juan Tu,et al.  Inertial cavitation dose produced in ex vivo rabbit ear arteries with Optison by 1-MHz pulsed ultrasound. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[163]  Hervé Rigneault,et al.  Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy diffusion laws to probe the submicron cell membrane organization. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[164]  C. Church,et al.  Porous PLGA microparticles: AI-700, an intravenously administered ultrasound contrast agent for use in echocardiography. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[165]  Dennis L Eggett,et al.  Removal of Streptococcus mutans biofilm by bubbles. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[166]  Kishan Dholakia,et al.  Membrane disruption by optically controlled microbubble cavitation , 2005 .

[167]  C. Rao,et al.  Expression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule in carcinoma cells present in blood and primary and metastatic tumors. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[168]  Ronald D. Vale,et al.  Single-Molecule Microscopy Reveals Plasma Membrane Microdomains Created by Protein-Protein Networks that Exclude or Trap Signaling Molecules in T Cells , 2005, Cell.

[169]  Thierry Bettinger,et al.  Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[170]  Nico de Jong,et al.  High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[171]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Micromanipulation of endothelial cells: ultrasound-microbubble-cell interaction. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[172]  M. Wheatley,et al.  Polymeric contrast agent with targeting potential. , 2004, Ultrasonics.

[173]  Cheri X Deng,et al.  Ultrasound-induced cell membrane porosity. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[174]  Detlef Lohse,et al.  Brandaris 128: A digital 25 million frames per second camera with 128 highly sensitive frames , 2003 .

[175]  B. Goldberg,et al.  Effect of shell type on the in vivo backscatter from polymer-encapsulated microbubbles. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[176]  C. Holland,et al.  In vitro characterization of liposomes and Optison by acoustic scattering at 3.5 MHz. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[177]  S. Kaul,et al.  Influence of microbubble surface charge on capillary transit and myocardial contrast enhancement. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[178]  K. Ley,et al.  Ultrasound Assessment of Inflammation and Renal Tissue Injury With Microbubbles Targeted to P-Selectin , 2001, Circulation.

[179]  N. Allbritton,et al.  Spatial control of cellular measurements with the laser micropipet. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[180]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. I. Quantification of molecular uptake and cell viability. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[181]  S. Kaul,et al.  Noninvasive Ultrasound Imaging of Inflammation Using Microbubbles Targeted to Activated Leukocytes , 2000, Circulation.

[182]  H. Maeda,et al.  Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. , 2000, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[183]  N. Allbritton,et al.  Measurement of kinase activation in single mammalian cells , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[184]  J. Korlach,et al.  Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with single-molecule sensitivity on cell and model membranes. , 1999, Cytometry.

[185]  M W Berns,et al.  Laser-micropipet combination for single-cell analysis. , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[186]  D. Miller,et al.  Ultrasonic detection of resonant cavitation bubbles in a flow tube by their second-harmonic emissions , 1981 .

[187]  H. G. Flynn Cavitation dynamics. I. A mathematical formulation , 1975 .

[188]  R. Gramiak,et al.  Echocardiography of the aortic root. , 1968, Investigative radiology.

[189]  Kyung Ho Lee,et al.  Drug perfusion enhancement in tissue model by steady streaming induced by oscillating microbubbles , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[190]  P. Vlachos,et al.  Three-dimensional microfluidic collagen hydrogels for investigating flow-mediated tumor-endothelial signaling and vascular organization. , 2014, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[191]  Z. Dai,et al.  Contrast ultrasound-guided photothermal therapy using gold nanoshelled microcapsules in breast cancer. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[192]  N. de Jong,et al.  20 years of ultrasound contrast agent modeling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[193]  S. Kawakami,et al.  Enhanced transfection efficiency into macrophages and dendritic cells by a combination method using mannosylated lipoplexes and bubble liposomes with ultrasound exposure. , 2010, Human gene therapy.

[194]  Stefaan C De Smedt,et al.  Design and evaluation of doxorubicin-containing microbubbles for ultrasound-triggered doxorubicin delivery: cytotoxicity and mechanisms involved. , 2010, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[195]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Increasing the Endothelial Layer Permeability Through Ultrasound-Activated Microbubbles , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[196]  James J. Choi,et al.  Noninvasive, transcranial and localized opening of the blood-brain barrier using focused ultrasound in mice. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[197]  E. Shimoni,et al.  Therapeutic ultrasound-mediated DNA to cell and nucleus: bioeffects revealed by confocal and atomic force microscopy , 2006, Gene Therapy.

[198]  Ekaterina Lukianova,et al.  Photothermal responses of individual cells. , 2005, Journal of biomedical optics.

[199]  C. Chin,et al.  Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[200]  F J Ten Cate,et al.  Two-dimensional contrast echocardiography. I. In vitro development and quantitative analysis of echo contrast agents. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.