Using Predicted Bicyclist and Pedestrian Route Choice to Enhance Mode Choice Models

Recent advances in bicyclist and pedestrian route choice modeling have shown that a variety of attributes affect the paths chosen for cycling and walking. They also allow one to estimate the effect on route choice of specific network changes, such as new bicycle facilities or pedestrian crossings. Route choices do not, however, tell one anything explicit about changes in decisions to walk or cycle in the first place. Cyclists might go out of their way to use a bike lane or to avoid a busy street, but how do those same features along a potential route influence the choice to cycle instead of using another travel mode? Route choice models are applied to predict the cycling and walking routes considered for a given trip, and the resulting route-level attributes are used to predict trip mode choice. In general, existing route preferences do carry over to mode choice, but with important differences, especially for bicycle facility types and female cyclists. The results show that available off-street paths and low-traffic on-street routes not only draw cyclists from other facilities but also make prospective riders more likely to cycle on a given trip. Gender differences are found for decisions to bicycle, with women showing a lower propensity than men to cycle on a similar trip and also stronger sensitivity to the availability of routes with lower traffic stress. Traffic-calmed streets, such as bicycle boulevards, may be particularly important in reducing the observed bicycling gender gap for everyday travel.

[1]  Lisa Zorn,et al.  Incorporating user based perspective of livability projects in SF-CHAMP mode choice models , 2013 .

[2]  Billy Charlton,et al.  A GPS-based bicycle route choice model for San Francisco, California , 2011 .

[3]  Zhan Guo,et al.  Pedestrian Environment and Route Choice: Evidence from New York City and Hong Kong , 2013 .

[4]  James G. Strathman,et al.  Modeling Access Mode Choice for Inter-Suburban Commuter Rail , 2011 .

[5]  Kelly R Evenson,et al.  Influence of the Built Environment on Pedestrian Route Choices of Adolescent Girls , 2015, Environment and behavior.

[6]  Daniel A. Rodriguez,et al.  The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment , 2004 .

[7]  Susan L Handy,et al.  How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[8]  Feng Liu,et al.  Recent Practices in Regional Modeling of Nonmotorized Travel , 2012 .

[9]  Keechoo Choi,et al.  To Walk or Not to Walk: Testing the Effect of Path Walkability on Transit Users' Access Mode Choices to the Station , 2015 .

[10]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data , 2012 .

[11]  David Ogilvie,et al.  Are GIS-modelled routes a useful proxy for the actual routes followed by commuters? , 2015, Journal of transport & health.

[12]  Marc Schlossberg,et al.  School Trips: Effects of Urban Form and Distance on Travel Mode , 2006 .

[13]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Route choice of cyclists in Zurich , 2010 .

[14]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Bicycle boulevards and changes in physical activity and active transportation: findings from a natural experiment. , 2014, Preventive medicine.

[15]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .