The INVENT framework: Examining the role of information visualization in the reconceptualization of digital libraries

The objective of this paper is to show how information visualization can play an important and catalytic role in the reconceptualization of digital libraries as interactive knowledge environments. Information visualization has long been described as a beneficial and promising technology for digital libraries. Today, however, few digital libraries rely on information visualization concepts and techniques. This is because the research agenda has been dominated by first-generation challenges, such as digitization, organization, preservation, and facilitating access through conventional search and browse interfaces. As a result, digital libraries are still conceptualized as curated, networked, and searchable document repositories. But new research directions are reconceptualizing them as interactive knowledge environments. This paper re-examines the role of information visualization in this reconceptualization. It introduces a new conceptual framework for digital libraries called INVENT: INteractive Visual ENironmenTs. The INVENT framework emphasizes the importance of rich interaction with representations of information, especially visual representations, for supporting cognitive and knowledge work activities. There are six elements in the framework: digital objects, representations, activities, interactions, actors, and ecologies. This paper suggests that these elements should be conceptual cornerstones in the knowledge environment conceptualization of digital libraries.

[1]  Angi Herold Faiks,et al.  Gaining User Insight: A Case Study Illustrating the Card Sort Technique. , 2000 .

[2]  IAN ROWLANDS,et al.  Digital Libraries: Assumptions and Concepts , 1999 .

[3]  Mike Kuniavsky,et al.  Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner's Guide to User Research (Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies) (The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies) , 2003 .

[4]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Digital libraries , 1995, CACM.

[5]  Mark Sumner,et al.  Characterizing Interaction with Visual Mathematical Representations , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[6]  Vannevar Bush,et al.  As we may think , 1945, INTR.

[7]  S. L. Star,et al.  Social informatics of digital library use and infrastructure , 1996 .

[8]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Reading and Interactivity in the Digital Library: Creating an experience that transcends paper , 2003 .

[9]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[10]  Ganesh S. Oak.  Information Visualization Introduction , 2022 .

[11]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[12]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Visualising Semantic Spaces and Author Co-Citation Networks in Digital Libraries , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[13]  Anita Sundaram Coleman,et al.  Interactional Digital Libraries: introduction to a special issue on Interactivity in Digital Libraries , 2006 .

[14]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research , 2000, TCHI.

[15]  Manfred A. Jeusfeld,et al.  Beyond information searching and browsing: acquiring knowledge from digital libraries , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[16]  Clifford A. Lynch,et al.  When documents deceive: Trust and provenance as new factors for information retrieval in a tangled web , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  Anita Coleman,et al.  The Design and Evaluation of Interactivities in a Digital Library , 2002, D Lib Mag..

[18]  Louis B. Rosenfeld,et al.  Information architecture for the world wide web - designing large-scale web sites , 1998 .

[19]  A. B. Britton,et al.  Information retrieval interaction Peter Ingwersen London: Taylor Graham, 1992 Paperback. x, 246 pp. €30 ISBN 0 947568 54 9 , 1993 .

[20]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Interactive Skill in Scrabble , 2020, Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[21]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  The myth of the paperless office , 2001 .

[23]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Augmenting Library Services: Toward the Sharium , 1999 .

[24]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Going digital: a look at assumptions underlying digital libraries , 1995, CACM.

[25]  Dagobert Soergel.  A Framework for Digital Library Research: Broadening the Vision , 2002, D Lib Mag..

[26]  Marti A. Hearst.  Research in Support of Digital Libraries at Xerox PARC; Part I: The Changing Social Roles of Documents , 1996, D Lib Mag..

[27]  Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang,et al.  Interoperability for digital libraries worldwide , 1998, CACM.

[28]  Howard Besser.  The Next Stage: Moving from Isolated Digital Collections to Interoperable Digital Libraries , 2002, First Monday.

[29]  David Kirsh,et al.  The Intelligent Use of Space , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[30]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  Research in Support of Digital Libraries at Xerox PARC: Part II: Paper and Digital Documents , 1996, D Lib Mag..

[31]  Gobinda G. Chowdhury,et al.  Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to Its Full Potential , 2004 .

[32]  DAVID KIRSH,et al.  Interactivity and multimedia interfaces , 1997 .

[33]  Shiyong Lu,et al.  The Semantic Web: opportunities and challenges for next-generation Web applications , 2002, Inf. Res..

[34]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Visual interfaces to digital libraries , 2002, JCDL '02.

[35]  Verna Allee,et al.  The Knowledge Evolution: Expanding Organizational Intelligence , 1997 .

[36]  Albert Weale,et al.  Forms of Representation , 1999 .

[37]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  Information and information systems , 1991 .

[38]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Information Seeking in Electronic Environments , 1995 .

[39]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine , 1993 .

[40]  David Kirsh,et al.  Adapting the Environment Instead of Oneself , 2022 .

[41]  Catherine C. Marshall.  The Future of Annotation in a Digital (Paper) World , 1998 .

[42]  Michael E. Lesk,et al.  Practical Digital Libraries: Books, Bytes, and Bucks , 1997 .

[43]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Technologies of Information: HCI and the digital library , 2002 .

[44]  Elaine Svenonius.  The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization , 2000 .

[45]  D. Grant Campbell,et al.  Panizzi, Lubetzky, and Google : How the modern web environment is reinventing the theory of cataloguing , 2004 .

[46]  Alan J. Dix,et al.  Starting simple: adding value to static visualisation through simple interaction , 1998, AVI '98.

[47]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[48]  Ramana Rao,et al.  Rich interaction in the digital library , 1995, CACM.

[49]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[50]  S. Schwan,et al.  The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots , 2004 .

[51]  Dennis Nicholson.  The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization , 2003 .

[52]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[53]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Visualizing knowledge domains , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[54]  D. Grant Campbell,et al.  The ontological perspectives of the semantic Web and the Metadata Harvesting Protocol: Applications of metadata for improving Web search , 2001 .

[55]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  What are Digital Libraries? Competing Visions , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[56]  Gary G. Yen,et al.  Time line visualization of research fronts , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[57]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries: Motivation, Utilization, and Socio-technical Challenges , 2002, Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries.

[58]  Jan W. Buzydlowski,et al.  Real-time author co-citation mapping for online searching , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[59]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Information Retrieval Interaction , 1992 .

[60]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Streams, structures, spaces, scenarios, societies (5s): A formal model for digital libraries , 2004, TOIS.

[61]  Marc A. Smith,et al.  Visualization components for persistent conversations , 2001, CHI.

[62]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[63]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Weaving The Web: The Original Design And Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web , 1999 .

[64]  David M. Levy.  Digital Libraries and the Problem of Purpose , 2000 .

[65]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart , 1999 .

[66]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Progress Toward Digital Libraries: Augmentation through Integration , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[67]  IAN ROWLANDS,et al.  Digital Libraries: A Conceptual Framework , 1999 .

[68]  D. Grant Campbell,et al.  "I still like Google": University student perceptions of searching OPACs and the web , 2005, ASIST.

[69]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Toward Virtual Community Knowledge Evolution , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[70]  Hai-Ning Liang,et al.  Interactivity of Visual Mathematical Representations: Factors Affecting Learning and Cognitive Processes , 2006 .

[71]  Richard Furuta,et al.  Interactive Timeline Viewer (ItLv): A Tool to Visualize Variants Among Documents , 2002, Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries.

[72]  S. Payne,et al.  Thinking by Doing? Epistemic Actions in the Tower of Hanoi , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[73]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[74]  Christine L. Borgman.  Now That We Have Digital Collections, Why Do We Need Libraries?. , 1997 .

[75]  Andreas Paepcke,et al.  Digital Libraries: Searching Is Not Enough; What We Learned On-Site , 1996, D-Lib Magazine.

[76]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .