Analysis and expert assessment of the semantic similarity between land cover classes

Products of CORINE Land Cover (CLC), the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD), the FAO/UNEP Land Cover Classification System (LCCS), etc. currently provide an important source of information used for the assessment of issues such as landscape change, landscape fragmentation and the planning of urbanization. Assuming that the data from these various databases are often used in searching for solutions to environmental problems, it is necessary to know which classes of different databases exist and to what extent they are similar, i.e. their possible compatibility and interchangeability. An expert assessment of the similarity between the CLC and NLCD 1992 nomenclatures is presented. Such a similarity assessment in comparison with the ‘geometric model’, the ‘feature model’ and the ‘network model’ is not frequently used. The results obtained show the similarity of assessments completed by four experts who marked the degree of similarity between the compared land cover classes by 1 (almost similar classes), 0.5 (partially similar classes) and 0 (not similar classes). Four experts agreed on assigning 1 in only three cases; 0.5 was given 33 times. A single expert assigned 0.5 a total of 17 times. Results confirmed that the CLC and NLCD nomenclatures are not very similar.

[1]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[2]  Gerard Hazeu,et al.  Corine land cover change detection in Europe (case studies of the Netherlands and Slovakia) , 2007 .

[3]  O. W. Archibold,et al.  Assessment of seasonal change in a young aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) canopy using digital imagery , 2004 .

[4]  Mourad Ouzzani,et al.  Semantic Integration in Geosciences , 2010, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[5]  Richard A. Wadsworth,et al.  What is Land Cover? , 2005 .

[6]  Chen-Chieh Feng,et al.  Assessment of semantic similarity between land use/land cover classification systems , 2004, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[7]  J. Rogan,et al.  Remote sensing for mapping and monitoring land-cover and land-use change—an introduction , 2004 .

[8]  Michael Batty,et al.  Morphology from Imagery: Detecting and Measuring the Density of Urban Land Use , 1995 .

[9]  Christel Daniel-Le Bozec,et al.  The DebugIT Core Ontology: semantic integration of antibiotics resistance patterns , 2010, MedInfo.

[10]  András Bárdossy,et al.  Modeling of the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model , 2004 .

[11]  Gang Feng,et al.  Disease Ontology: a backbone for disease semantic integration , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  Yacov Y Haimes.  Systems-based guiding principles for risk modeling, planning, assessment, management, and communication. , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  Natalya F. Noy,et al.  Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches , 2004, SGMD.

[14]  Y. Heymann,et al.  CORINE Land Cover. Technical Guide , 1994 .

[15]  Patrick Hostert,et al.  Cross-border comparison of land cover and landscape pattern in Eastern Europe using a hybrid classification technique , 2006 .

[16]  A. Williams,et al.  Land use change and hydrological response in the Camel catchment, Cornwall , 2004 .

[17]  Ola Ahlqvist,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article International Journal of Geographical Information Science Using Uncertain Conceptual Spaces to Translate between Land Cover Categories Using Uncertain Conceptual Spaces to Translate between Land Cover Categories , 2022 .

[18]  Matthias Lange,et al.  SEMEDA: ontology based semantic integration of biological databases , 2003, Bioinform..

[19]  L. J. M. Jansen,et al.  Harmonization of land use class sets to facilitate compatibility and comparability of data across space and time , 2006 .

[20]  Volker Meyer,et al.  Flood Risk Assessment in European River Basins—Concept, Methods, and Challenges Exemplified at the Mulde River , 2009, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[21]  B. Osterburg,et al.  Cross compliance and the protection of grassland – Illustrative analyses of land use transitions between permanent grassland and arable land in German regions , 2012 .

[22]  Louisa J. M. Jansen,et al.  Land-cover harmonisation and semantic similarity: some methodological issues , 2008 .

[23]  Elizabeth R. Smith,et al.  Fragmentation of Continental United States Forests , 2002, Ecosystems.

[24]  Jan Feranec,et al.  Land cover changes in small catchments in Slovakia during 1990–2006 and their effects on frequency of flood events , 2011 .

[25]  J. Rogan,et al.  Remote sensing technology for mapping and monitoring land-cover and land-use change , 2004 .

[26]  Peter Vogt,et al.  Mapping Spatial Patterns with Morphological Image Processing , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[27]  Angela Schwering,et al.  Approaches to Semantic Similarity Measurement for Geo‐Spatial Data: A Survey , 2008, Trans. GIS.

[28]  Marinos Kavouras,et al.  Theories of Geographic Concepts: Ontological Approaches to Semantic Integration , 2007 .

[29]  F. Müller,et al.  Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics , 2012 .

[30]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Ontology-Based Integration of Information - A Survey of Existing Approaches , 2001, OIS@IJCAI.

[31]  R. Cooke.  Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science , 1991 .

[32]  Alexis Comber,et al.  Comparing statistical and semantic approaches for identifying change from land cover datasets. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[33]  Alon Y. Halevy,et al.  Semantic Integration , 2005, AI Mag..

[34]  Peter F. Fisher,et al.  Comparing the consistency of expert land cover knowledge , 2005 .