Solar shield: forecasting and mitigating space weather effects on high-voltage power transmission systems

In this paper, central elements of the Solar Shield project, launched to design and establish an experimental system capable of forecasting the space weather effects on high-voltage power transmission system, are described. It will be shown how Sun–Earth system data and models hosted at the Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC) are used to generate two-level magnetohydrodynamics-based forecasts providing 1–2 day and 30–60 min lead-times. The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) represents the end-user, the power transmission industry, in the project. EPRI integrates the forecast products to an online display tool providing information about space weather conditions to the member power utilities. EPRI also evaluates the economic impacts of severe storms on power transmission systems. The economic analysis will quantify the economic value of the generated forecasting system. The first version of the two-level forecasting system is currently running in real-time at CCMC. An initial analysis of the system’s capabilities has been completed, and further analysis is being carried out to optimize the performance of the system. Although the initial results are encouraging, definite conclusions about system’s performance can be given only after more extensive analysis, and implementation of an automatic evaluation process using forecasted and observed geomagnetically induced currents from different nodes of the North American power transmission system. The final output of the Solar Shield will be a recommendation for an optimal forecasting system that may be transitioned into space weather operations.

[1]  William A. Radasky,et al.  Too Important to Fail , 2005 .

[2]  P. Barnes,et al.  Economic consequences of geomagnetic storms (a summary) , 1990, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[3]  D. Odstrcil,et al.  Distortion of the interplanetary magnetic field by three‐dimensional propagation of coronal mass ejections in a structured solar wind , 1999 .

[4]  Ramon Lopez,et al.  Predicting magnetopause crossings at geosynchronous orbit during the Halloween storms , 2007 .

[5]  Ioannis A. Daglis,et al.  Space Weather: Physics and Effects , 2007 .

[6]  John G. Kappenman,et al.  The Evolving Vulnerability of Electric Power Grids , 2004 .

[7]  L. Bolduc GIC observations and studies in the Hydro-Quebec power system , 2002 .

[8]  David Boteler,et al.  The effects of geomagnetic disturbances on electrical systems at the earth's surface , 1998 .

[9]  W. H. Barlow,et al.  VI. On the spontaneous electrical currents observed in the wires of the electric telegraph , 1849, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[10]  Antti Pulkkinen,et al.  Determination of ground conductivity and system parameters for optimal modeling of geomagnetically induced current flow in technological systems , 2007 .

[11]  C.T. Gaunt,et al.  Transformer failures in regions incorrectly considered to have low GIC-risk , 2007, 2007 IEEE Lausanne Power Tech.

[12]  V. Albertson,et al.  Bracing for the geomagnetic storms , 1990, IEEE Spectrum.

[13]  R. T. Byerly,et al.  SUNBURST/spl minus/a network of GIC monitoring systems , 1994 .

[14]  P. Roe,et al.  A Solution-Adaptive Upwind Scheme for Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics , 1999 .

[15]  Louis J. Lanzerotti Economic Impacts of Space Weather , 2008 .

[16]  R. Pirjola Space weather effects on power grids , 2007 .

[17]  Sture Lindahl,et al.  Geomagnetic storm of 29–31 October 2003: Geomagnetically induced currents and their relation to problems in the Swedish high‐voltage power transmission system , 2005 .

[18]  J. Kappenman,et al.  Management of the geomagnetically induced current risks on the national grid company's electric power transmission system , 2002 .

[19]  Peter Wintoft,et al.  Study of the solar wind coupling to the time difference horizontal geomagnetic field , 2005 .

[20]  R. Pirjola,et al.  Geomagnetically induced currents in an electric power transmission system at low latitudes in Brazil: A case study , 2007 .

[21]  Michael Hesse,et al.  Validation of the coronal mass ejection predictions at the Earth orbit estimated by ENLIL heliosphere cone model , 2009 .

[22]  Dusan Odstrcil,et al.  Propagation of the 12 May 1997 interplanetary coronal mass ejection in evolving solar wind structures , 2005 .

[23]  Antti Pulkkinen,et al.  Statistics of extreme geomagnetically induced current events , 2008 .

[24]  Tom Molinski,et al.  Why utilities respect geomagnetically induced currents , 2002 .

[25]  Dusan Odstrcil,et al.  Novel approach to geomagnetically induced current forecasts based on remote solar observations , 2009 .

[26]  Risto Pirjola,et al.  Calculation of geomagnetically induced currents in mid‐ to low‐latitude power grids based on the plane wave method: A preliminary case study , 2009 .

[27]  Michael Hesse,et al.  First-principles modeling of geomagnetically induced electromagnetic fields and currents from upstream solar wind to the surface of the Earth , 2007 .

[28]  L. Ofman,et al.  Cone model for halo CMEs: Application to space weather forecasting , 2004 .

[29]  C. Schrijver,et al.  Stream structure and coronal sources of the solar wind during the May 12th, 1997 CME , 2003 .

[30]  A. Pulkkinen,et al.  Spatiotemporal Characteristics of the Ground Electromagnetic Field Fluctuations in the Auroral Region and Implications on the Predictability of Geomagnetically Induced Currents , 2007 .

[31]  J. Steinberg,et al.  Extremely high speed solar wind: 29–30 October 2003 , 2004 .

[32]  Henrik Lundstedt,et al.  The sun, space weather and GIC effects in Sweden , 2004 .

[33]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Decision theory and the analysis of rare event space weather forecasts , 2006 .