Evaluation of Gateway and Low-Cost Traffic-Calming Treatments for Major Routes in Small Rural Communities

Many rural communities have developed around highways or major county roads; as a result, the main street through small rural communities is often part of a high-speed rural highway. Highways and county roads are characterized by high speeds outside the city limits; they then transition into a reduced speed section through the rural community. Consequently, drivers passing through the community often enter at high speeds and maintain those speeds as they travel through the community. Traffic calming in small rural communities along major roadways is common in Europe, but the U.S. does not have experience with applying traffic-calming measures outside of major urban areas. The purpose of the project was to evaluate traffic-calming treatments on the major road through small Iowa communities using either single-measure low-cost or gateway treatments. The project was partially funded by the Iowa Highway Research Board (IHRB). The focus of the IHRB portion was to evaluate single-measure, low-cost, traffic-calming measures that are appropriate to major roads through small rural communities. Seven different low-cost traffic treatments were implemented and evaluated in five rural Iowa communities. The research evaluated the use of two gateway treatments in Union and Roland; five single-measure treatments (speed table, on-pavement “SLOW” markings, a driver speed feedback sign, tubular markers, and on-pavement entrance treatments) were evaluated in Gilbert, Slater, and Dexter.

[1]  Keith K. Knapp,et al.  GUIDELINES FOR THE CONVERSION OF URBAN FOUR-LANE UNDIVIDED ROADWAYS TO THREE-LANE TWO-WAY LEFT-TURN LANE FACILITIES , 2001 .

[2]  Bruce Robinson,et al.  Roundabouts : an informational guide , 2000 .

[3]  D W Bennett,et al.  COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE INSULATION MEASURES TO EXISTING HOUSES , 1985 .

[4]  F P Rivara,et al.  Urban-rural location and the risk of dying in a pedestrian-vehicle collision. , 1988, The Journal of trauma.

[5]  Andrew G Macbeth CALMING ARTERIALS IN TORONTO , 1998 .

[6]  G A Ryan NHMRC ROAD ACCIDENT RESEARCH UNIT , 1991 .

[7]  Keith K Knapp,et al.  TEMPORARY SPEED HUMP IMPACT EVALUATION , 2002 .

[8]  Nikiforos Stamatiadis,et al.  Geometric Design Practices for European Roads , 2001 .

[9]  Eric Meyer,et al.  Evaluation of Orange Removable Rumble Strips for Highway Work Zones , 2000 .

[10]  M M Marti,et al.  INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAFFIC CALMING STRATEGIES ON DRIVER BEHAVIOR, TRAFFIC FLOW AND SPEED , 2001 .

[11]  Giulio Ponte,et al.  TRAVELLING SPEED AND THE RISK OF CRASH INVOLVEMENT: VOLUME 1: FINDINGS , 1997 .

[12]  Paul J Carlson,et al.  EVALUATION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR RURAL HIGH-SPEED MAINTENANCE WORK ZONES: SECOND YEAR ACTIVITIES AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS , 2000 .

[13]  C. F. Sirmans,et al.  TRAFFIC EXTERNALITIES AND SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE PRICES. , 1992 .

[14]  D. Gordon Bagby The Effects of Traffic Flow on Residential Property Values , 1980 .

[15]  R. Lyman Ott.,et al.  An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis , 1977 .

[16]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Traffic Calming: State of the Practice , 1999 .

[17]  E Meyer A NEW LOOK AT OPTICAL SPEED BARS , 2001 .