Quantum Auctions

We present a quantum auction protocol using superpositions to represent bids and distributed search to identify the winner(s). Measuring the final quantum state gives the auction outcome while simultaneously destroying the superposition. Thus non-winning bids are never revealed. Participants can use entanglement to arrange for correlations among their bids, with the assurance that this entanglement is not observable by others. The protocol is useful for information hiding applications, such as partnership bidding with allocative externality or concerns about revealing bidding preferences. The protocol applies to a variety of auction types, e.g., first or second price, and to auctions involving either a single item or arbitrary bundles of items (i.e., combinatorial auctions). We analyze the game-theoretical behavior of the quantum protocol for the simple case of a sealed-bid quantum, and show how a suitably designed adiabatic search reduces the possibilities for bidders to game the auction. This design illustrates how incentive rather that computational constraints affect quantum algorithm choices.

[1]  V. Smith,et al.  Theory and individual behavior of first-price auctions , 1988 .

[2]  David A. Meyer,et al.  Quantum Communication in Games , 2004 .

[3]  I. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Introduction to the Tenth Anniversary Edition , 2010 .

[4]  E. Farhi,et al.  A Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP-Complete Problem , 2001, Science.

[5]  Lov K. Grover Quantum Mechanics Helps in Searching for a Needle in a Haystack , 1997, quant-ph/9706033.

[6]  Robert B. Wilson Chapter 8 Strategic analysis of auctions , 1992 .

[7]  Hui Li,et al.  Entanglement enhanced multiplayer quantum games , 2002 .

[8]  Jiangfeng Du,et al.  Experimental realization of quantum games on a quantum computer. , 2001, Physical Review Letters.

[9]  Christoph Dürr,et al.  A Quantum Algorithm for Finding the Minimum , 1996, ArXiv.

[10]  Peter W. Shor,et al.  Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring , 1994, Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[11]  B. Moldovanu,et al.  Allocative and Informational Externalities in Auctions and Related Mechanisms , 2005 .

[12]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  A theory of auctions and competitive bidding , 1982 .

[13]  Pierfrancesco La Mura Correlated Equilibria of Classical Strategic Games with Quantum Signals , 2003, ArXiv.

[14]  J. Eisert,et al.  Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies , 1998, quant-ph/9806088.

[15]  Charles R. Plott,et al.  Nonlinear Behavior in Sealed Bid First Price Auctions , 1998 .

[16]  Michel Gendreau,et al.  Combinatorial auctions , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[17]  T. Hogg Quantum search heuristics , 2000 .

[18]  R. Radner Collusive behavior in noncooperative epsilon-equilibria of oligopolies with long but finite lives , 1980 .

[19]  Martin Ranger The Generalized Ascending Proxy Auction in the Presence of Externalities , 2005 .

[20]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Quantum Solution of Coordination Problems , 2003, Quantum Inf. Process..

[21]  Tad Hogg,et al.  How Well Do People Play a Quantum Prisoner’s Dilemma? , 2006, Quantum Inf. Process..

[22]  Tad Hogg,et al.  A Quantum Treatment of Public Goods Economics , 2002, Quantum Inf. Process..

[23]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Tight bounds on quantum searching , 1996, quant-ph/9605034.

[24]  Moni Naor,et al.  Privacy preserving auctions and mechanism design , 1999, EC '99.

[25]  T. Hogg Adiabatic Quantum Computing for Random Satisfiability Problems , 2002, quant-ph/0206059.

[26]  S. J. van Enk,et al.  Classical rules in quantum games , 2002 .

[27]  Jens Eisert,et al.  Quantum games , 2020, Understanding Game Theory.