Metal artifact reduction software used with abdominopelvic dual-energy CT of patients with metal hip prostheses: assessment of image quality and clinical feasibility.

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to determine the feasibility of using Metal Artifact Reduction (MAR) software for abdominopelvic dual-energy CT in patients with metal hip prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 33 patients (male-female ratio, 19:14; mean age, 63.7 years) who received total hip replacements and 20 patients who did not have metal prostheses as the control group. All of the patients underwent dual-energy CT. The quality of the images reconstructed using the MAR algorithm and of those reconstructed using the standard reconstruction was evaluated in terms of the visibility of the bladder wall, pelvic sidewall, rectal shelf, and bone-prosthesis interface and the overall diagnostic image quality with a 4-point scale. The mean and SD attenuation values in Hounsfield units were measured in the bladder, pelvic sidewall, and rectal shelf. For validation of the MAR interpolation algorithm, pelvis phantoms with small bladder "lesions" and metal hip prostheses were made, and images of the phantoms both with and without MAR reconstruction were evaluated. RESULTS Image quality was significantly better with MAR reconstruction than without at all sites except the rectal shelf, where the image quality either had not changed or had worsened after MAR reconstruction. The mean attenuation value was changed after MAR reconstruction to its original expected value at the pelvic sidewall (p < 0.001) and inside the bladder (p < 0.001). The SD attenuation value was significantly decreased after MAR reconstruction at the pelvic sidewall (p = 0.019) but did not show significant differences at the bladder (p = 0.173) or rectal shelf (p = 0.478). In the phantom study, all lesions obscured by metal artifacts on the standard reconstruction images were visualized after MAR reconstruction; however, new artifacts had developed in other parts of the MAR reconstruction images. CONCLUSION The use of MAR software with dual-energy CT decreases metal artifacts and increases diagnostic confidence in the assessment of the pelvic cavity but also introduces new artifacts that can obscure pelvic structures.

[1]  Jin-Suck Suh,et al.  Metal artefact reduction in gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy CT with and without metal artefact reduction software , 2012, European Radiology.

[2]  Kenneth A Buckwalter,et al.  Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient. , 2002, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[3]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[4]  Yiannis Kyriakou,et al.  Reducing Metal Artifacts in Computed Tomography Caused by Hip Endoprostheses Using a Physics-Based Approach , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[5]  W. Kalender,et al.  A pragmatic approach to metal artifact reduction in CT: merging of metal artifact reduced images , 2004, European Radiology.

[6]  Julia F. Barrett,et al.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[7]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Metal Artifact Correction Algorithm for CT , 2013, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC).

[8]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation , 2011, European Radiology.

[9]  Alexander A. Zamyatin,et al.  Metal artifact reduction algorithm for single energy and dual energy CT scans , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[10]  J. Verburg,et al.  CT metal artifact reduction method correcting for beam hardening and missing projections , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Jacob Geleijns,et al.  Metal artifact reduction for CT: development, implementation, and clinical comparison of a generic and a scanner-specific technique. , 2012, Medical physics.

[12]  Fabian Bamberg,et al.  Metal Artifact Reduction by Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Using Energetic Extrapolation: A Systematically Optimized Protocol , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[13]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  Metal Artifact Reduction From Reformatted Projections for Hip Prostheses in Multislice Helical Computed Tomography: Techniques and Initial Clinical Results , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[14]  Robert G. Paden,et al.  Metal artifact reduction image reconstruction algorithm for CT of implanted metal orthopedic devices: a work in progress , 2009, Skeletal Radiology.

[15]  H. Kundel,et al.  Measurement of observer agreement. , 2003, Radiology.

[16]  A. Feydy,et al.  Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: reduction of metal artifacts at CT. , 2013, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.