Modern Concepts of Caries Measurement

Following the consideration of several recent systematic and other reviews, there is a growing professional and scientific consensus that caries measurement methodology in caries clinical trials (CCT) should be updated to reflect progress made elsewhere in cariology. In this paper, therefore, “modern” means accepted in contemporary dental research and dental practice on the basis of sound research evidence—not necessarily new or requiring the use of new technology. Caries measurement should be seen in the context of the objectives of modern clinical caries management and the continuum of disease states, ranging from sub-surface carious changes through to more advanced lesions. Measurement concepts can be applied to at least three levels: the tooth surface, the individual, or the group/population. All are relevant to CCTs. Modern clinical caries management can be seen as comprised of seven discrete but linked steps (Steps 2, 3, and 4 are directly concerned with measurement.): (1) ‘Caries detection’ represents a yes/no decision as to whether caries is present; (2) lesion measurement assesses defined stages of the caries process, taking into account the histopatholgical morphology and appearance of different sizes and types of lesion and the diagnostic threshold(s) being used; (3) lesion monitoring by repeated measures at a series of examinations is used when lesions are less advanced than the stage judged to require operative intervention (A comparison of serial measurements permits the efficacy of preventive care aiming either to arrest or to reverse the lesion to be assessed.); (4) caries activity measures would be very valuable, but are relatively poorly developed and tested at present; (5) diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical decision-making are the important human processes in which all the information obtained from steps 1 to 4 is synthesised; (6) interventions/treatments, both preventive and operative, are now routinely used for caries management; and (7) outcome of caries control/management assesses caries management by examining evidence on the long-term outcomes. A challenge for the future is to define a range of optimal caries measurement methods—in use or in development in recent trials, in clinical practice, and/or in caries epidemiology—that will best contribute to more efficient, modern caries clinical trials.

[1]  R. Faller Assessment of Oral Health: Diagnostic Techniques and Validation Criteria , 2000 .

[2]  N B Pitts,et al.  Detection and measurement of approximal radiolucencies by computer-aided image analysis. , 1984, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[3]  A. Horowitz A Report on the NIH Consensus Development Conference on Diagnosis and Management of Dental Caries Throughout Life , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[4]  V. Baelum,et al.  Caries preventive effect of sugar-substituted chewing gum. , 2001, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[5]  N. Pitts Systems for grading approximal carious lesions and overlaps diagnosed from bitewing radiographs. Proposals for future standardization. , 1984, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[6]  J. T. ten Bosch,et al.  Optical Methods for the Detection and Quantification of Caries , 1987, Advances in dental research.

[7]  A. Neilson,et al.  The clinical behaviour of free smooth surface carious lesions monitored over 2 years in a group of Scottish children , 1991, British Dental Journal.

[8]  N. Pitts,et al.  Preventive Care Advised (PCA)/Operative Care Advised (OCA)--categorising caries by the management option. , 1995, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[9]  D. Jackson The clinical diagnosis of dental caries. , 1950, British dental journal.

[10]  N. Pitts Score system for behaviour of radiologically diagnosed approximal carious lesions. , 1985, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[11]  J. T. ten Bosch,et al.  Developments in Caries Diagnosis and Their Relationship to Treatment Decisions and Quality of Care , 1998, Caries Research.

[12]  J J ten Bosch,et al.  Characterization and validation of diagnostic methods. , 2000, Monographs in oral science.

[13]  N. Pitts Patient caries status in the context of practical, evidence-based management of the initial caries lesion. , 1997, Journal of dental education.

[14]  J. Stamm The Classic Caries Clinical Trial: Constraints and Opportunities , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[15]  A. Ismail,et al.  A systematic review of clinical diagnostic criteria of early childhood caries. , 1999, Journal of public health dentistry.

[16]  K. Ekstrand Improving Clinical Visual Detection—Potential for Caries Clinical Trials , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[17]  A. Ismail,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of precavitated carious lesions. , 1997, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[18]  L. Hollender,et al.  Influence of topical application of fluoride on rate of progress of carious lesions in children. A long-term roentgenographic follow-up. , 1969, Odontologisk revy.

[19]  Marthaler Tm THE CARIES-INHIBITING EFFECT OF AMINE FLUORIDE DENTIFRICES IN CHILDREN DURING THREE YEARS OF UNSUPERVISED USE. , 1965 .

[20]  Marthaler Tm A standardized system of recording dental conditions. , 1966 .

[21]  N. Pitts Approximal radiolucencies in partially overlapped enamel: the need for quantitation and a preliminary assessment of a computer-aided image analysis method. , 1986, Quintessence international.

[22]  N. Pitts,et al.  Diagnostic tools and measurements--impact on appropriate care. , 1997, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[23]  L. K. Bandlish Monitoring the behaviour of posterior approximal carious lesions by image analysis of serial standardised bitewing radiographs' , 1987, British Dental Journal.

[24]  O. B. Dirks,et al.  Longitudinal dental caries study in children 9–15 years of age , 1961 .

[25]  N. Pitts Need for Early Caries Detection Methods:: A European Perspective , 2000 .

[26]  N. Pitts,et al.  A proposed method for assessing the quality of sealants--the CCC Sealant Evaluation System. , 2001, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[27]  F. Scheutz,et al.  Dental caries in Danish children and adolescents 1988-1997. , 1999, Community dental health.

[28]  N B Pitts,et al.  Occlusal caries diagnosis: a changing challenge for clinicians and epidemiologists. , 1993, Journal of dentistry.

[29]  N. Pitts,et al.  Effect of diagnostic threshold on the validity and reliability of epidemiological caries diagnosis using the Dundee Selectable Threshold Method for caries diagnosis (DSTM). , 2000, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[30]  C. Longbottom,et al.  The Challenges of Validating Diagnostic Methods and Selecting Appropriate Gold Standards , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[31]  N. Pitts The diagnosis of dental caries: 3. Rationale and overview of present and possible future techniques. , 1992, Dental Update.

[32]  J. van Aken,et al.  A Reproducible Method for Caries Evaluation , 1953, Journal of dental research.

[33]  N B Pitts,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of dental caries: a European perspective. , 2001, Journal of dental education.

[34]  O. Fejerskov,et al.  What Constitutes Dental Caries? Histopathology of Carious Enamel and Dentin Related to the Action of Cariogenic Biofilms , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[35]  T. Marthaler A standardized system of recording dental conditions. , 1966, Helvetica odontologica acta.

[36]  J. Featherstone,et al.  The Continuum of Dental Caries—Evidence for a Dynamic Disease Process , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[37]  N. Pitts,et al.  The Effect of Varying Diagnostic Thresholds upon Clinical Caries Data for a Low Prevalence Group , 1988, Journal of dental research.

[38]  A. Ismail,et al.  Visual and Visuo-tactile Detection of Dental Caries , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[39]  V. Baelum,et al.  Reliability of a New Caries Diagnostic System Differentiating between Active and Inactive Caries Lesions , 1999, Caries Research.

[40]  V. Baelum,et al.  Ten–Year Incidence of Dental Caries in Adult and Elderly Chinese , 2000, Caries Research.

[41]  N. Pitts,et al.  In vitro validity of the Dundee Selectable Threshold Method for caries diagnosis (DSTM). , 2000, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[42]  A. Kingman,et al.  Proposed methods for improving the efficiency of the DMFS index in assessing initiation and progression of dental caries. , 1997, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[43]  N. Pitts,et al.  Effects of diagnostic threshold and overlapped approximal surfaces on reported caries status. , 1991, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.