Cue salience and infant perseverative reaching: tests of the dynamic field theory.

Skilled behavior requires a balance between previously successful behaviors and new behaviors appropriate to the present context. We describe a dynamic field model for understanding this balance in infant perseverative reaching. The model predictions are tested with regard to the interaction of two aspects of the typical perseverative reaching task: the visual cue indicating the target and the memory demand created by the delay imposed between cueing and reaching. The memory demand was manipulated by imposing either a 0- or a 3-second delay, and the salience of the cue to reach was systematically varied. Infants demonstrated fewer perseverative errors at 0-delay versus 3-second delay based on the cue salience, such that a more salient visual cue was necessary to overcome a longer delay. These results have important implications for understanding both the basic perceptual-motor processes that produce reaching in infants and skilled flexible behavior in general.

[1]  P. Tibbetts :Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind , 2009 .

[2]  Christian Faubel,et al.  Learning to recognize objects on the fly: A neurally based dynamic field approach , 2008, Neural Networks.

[3]  Anne R. Schutte,et al.  Generalizing the dynamic field theory of spatial cognition across real and developmental time scales , 2008, Brain Research.

[4]  G. Schöner,et al.  Dynamic instabilities as mechanisms for emergence. , 2007, Developmental science.

[5]  Philip David Zelazo,et al.  The Influence of Number of A Trials on 2-Year-Olds' Behavior in Two A-Not-B-Type Search Tasks: A Test of the Hierarchical Competing Systems Model , 2006 .

[6]  Linda B Smith,et al.  Young infants reach correctly in A-not-B tasks: on the development of stability and perseveration. , 2006, Infant behavior & development.

[7]  E. Thelen,et al.  Using dynamic field theory to rethink infant habituation. , 2006, Psychological review.

[8]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Abstraction as dynamic interpretation in perceptual symbol systems , 2005 .

[9]  Sarah E. Berger Demands on Finite Cognitive Capacity Cause Infants' Perseverative Errors. , 2004, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[10]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Comparison of human infants and rhesus monkeys on Piaget's AB task: evidence for dependence on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  Ulrich Müller,et al.  The development of executive function in early childhood: I. The development of executive function. , 2003 .

[12]  G. Schöner,et al.  Preshaping and continuous evolution of motor cortical representations during movement preparation , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  Ulrich Müller,et al.  The development of executive function in early childhood. , 1991, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[14]  A. Diamond,et al.  Chapter 29. A Model System for Studying the Role of Dopamine in the Prefrontal Cortex during Early Development in Humans: Early and Continuously Treated Phenylketonuria , 2003 .

[15]  G. Schöner,et al.  Dynamic Field Theory of Movement Preparation , 2022 .

[16]  P. Bryant,et al.  The effect of spatial cues on infants’ responses in the AB task, with and without a hidden object. , 2001 .

[17]  E Thelen,et al.  The role of target distinctiveness in infant perseverative reaching. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[18]  E. Thelen,et al.  The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  Esther Thelen,et al.  Motor memory is a factor in infant perseverative errors , 2000 .

[20]  Philip David Zelazo,et al.  The A‐Not‐B Error: Results from a Logistic Meta‐Analysis , 1999 .

[21]  K. Espy,et al.  Executive Functioning in Preschool Children: Performance on A-Not-B and Other Delayed Response Format Tasks , 1999, Brain and Cognition.

[22]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Knowing in the context of acting: the task dynamics of the A-not-B error. , 1999, Psychological review.

[23]  Y. Munakata Article with Peer Commentaries and Response Infant Perseveration and Implications for Object Permanence Theories: a Pdp Model of the Ab B Task , 2022 .

[24]  Yuko Munakata,et al.  Perseverative reaching in infancy: The roles of hidden toys and motor history in the AB task , 1997 .

[25]  J. Reznick,et al.  Response modality affects human infant delayed-response performance. , 1996, Child development.

[26]  P. Kloeden,et al.  Numerical Solutions of Stochastic Differential Equations , 1995 .

[27]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  A. Diamond Neuropsychological insights into the meaning of object concept development. , 1991 .

[29]  A. Diamond Developmental Time Course in Human Infants and Infant Monkeys, and the Neural Bases of, Inhibitory Control in Reaching a , 1990, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[30]  J. Wishart Performance of young nonretarded children and children with Down syndrome on Piagetian infant search tasks. , 1987, American journal of mental deficiency.

[31]  H. Wellman,et al.  Infant search and object permanence: a meta-analysis of the A-not-B error. , 1987, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[32]  E Thelen,et al.  Treadmill-elicited stepping in seven-month-old infants. , 1986, Child development.

[33]  A. Diamond,et al.  Development of the ability to use recall to guide action, as indicated by infants' performance on AB. , 1985, Child development.

[34]  E. Thelen,et al.  The relationship between physical growth and a newborn reflex , 1984 .

[35]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Ad hoc categories , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[36]  G. Gratch,et al.  Piaget's stage IV object concept error: evidence of forgetting or object conception? , 1974, Child development.

[37]  P L Harris,et al.  Perseverative errors in search by young infants. , 1973, Child development.

[38]  Karl H. Pribram,et al.  An experimental analysis of the behavioral disturbance produced by a left frontal arachnoidal endothelioma (meningioma) , 1964 .

[39]  J. Piaget The construction of reality in the child , 1954 .