The effect of spatial smoothing on fMRI decoding of columnar-level organization with linear support vector machine

We examined how spatial smoothing affects the result of multivariate classification analysis using the linear support vector machine (SVM) for decoding columnar-level organization. It has been suggested that the effect of spatial smoothing on decoding performance is minor because smoothing operation is an invertible data transformation and such invertible transformation does not remove information in multivariate pattern. Our theoretical consideration, however, revealed that generalization score (performance for test samples unused during classifier training) was susceptible to non-uniform scaling of input data; SVM classifier became less sensitive to variability in shrunk dimension. This result indicates that spatial smoothing reduces sensitivity of SVM classifier to high spatial frequency pattern so that the effect of smoothing implies the amount of information distributed in spatial frequencies. We also examined the effect of smoothing in an fMRI experiment of decoding ocular dominance responses. The results of group statistic showed that large smoothing reduced decoding accuracies while the smoothing effect at individual subject were not the same for all subjects. These results suggest that spatial smoothing can have major effect on decoding performance and the informative pattern for columnar level decoding resides in higher frequencies on average across subjects while it may distribute multiple frequencies at individual subject level.

[1]  Polina Golland,et al.  Permutation Tests for Classification: Towards Statistical Significance in Image-Based Studies , 2003, IPMI.

[2]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Information-based functional brain mapping. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  C. Borror Nonparametric Statistical Methods, 2nd, Ed. , 2001 .

[4]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[6]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[7]  C.-Y.C. Chu,et al.  Pattern recognition and machine learning for magnetic resonance images with kernel methods , 2009 .

[8]  Janez Demsar,et al.  Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Comparison of multivariate classifiers and response normalizations for pattern-information fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[10]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  David D. Cox,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) “brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[12]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[13]  K. Strimmer,et al.  Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology A Shrinkage Approach to Large-Scale Covariance Matrix Estimation and Implications for Functional Genomics , 2011 .

[14]  Hans P. Op de Beeck,et al.  Against hyperacuity in brain reading: Spatial smoothing does not hurt multivariate fMRI analyses? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[15]  Olivier Ledoit,et al.  Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection , 2003 .

[16]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[17]  Jascha D. Swisher,et al.  Multiscale Pattern Analysis of Orientation-Selective Activity in the Primary Visual Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Christian Keysers,et al.  The impact of certain methodological choices on multivariate analysis of fMRI data with support vector machines , 2011, NeuroImage.

[19]  Hans P. Op de Beeck,et al.  Probing the mysterious underpinnings of multi-voxel fMRI analyses , 2010, NeuroImage.

[20]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  How does an fMRI voxel sample the neuronal activity pattern: Compact-kernel or complex spatiotemporal filter? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[21]  Matthew de Brecht,et al.  Combining sparseness and smoothness improves classification accuracy and interpretability , 2012, NeuroImage.

[22]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Knowing with Which Eye We See: Utrocular Discrimination and Eye-Specific Signals in Human Visual Cortex , 2010, PloS one.

[23]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[24]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  Support vector machines for temporal classification of block design fMRI data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[25]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Methods , 1973 .

[26]  G. Rees,et al.  Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[28]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[29]  D. Wolfe,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Methods. , 1974 .

[30]  Lawrence C. Sincich,et al.  Complete Pattern of Ocular Dominance Columns in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  Mechanisms underlying decoding at 7 T: Ocular dominance columns, broad structures, and macroscopic blood vessels in V1 convey information on the stimulated eye , 2010, NeuroImage.

[32]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Multiple scales of organization for object selectivity in ventral visual cortex , 2010, NeuroImage.

[33]  Geoffrey M Boynton,et al.  Imaging orientation selectivity: decoding conscious perception in V1 , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  Justin L. Gardner,et al.  Is cortical vasculature functionally organized? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[35]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  Modeling and analysis of mechanisms underlying fMRI-based decoding of information conveyed in cortical columns , 2011, NeuroImage.

[36]  Yasuhito Sawahata,et al.  Spatial smoothing hurts localization but not information: Pitfalls for brain mappers , 2010, NeuroImage.

[37]  Jeremy Freeman,et al.  Orientation Decoding Depends on Maps, Not Columns , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .