Defining Bots in an Enterprise Context

Bots, Virtual Assistants and Virtual Agents are well known in a personal environment. Technologies like “Apple Siri” or “Amazon Alexa” serve as digital assistants to enhance both accessibility and productivity. Yet, these technologies have to play with different rules in the enterprise context. Workflows within a digital workplace are different from what consumers are used to in a private surrounding. This concludes into the need for a definition for Enterprise Bots. In this short paper, we aim to provide insights in the current state of literature in this area and derive a definition for Enterprise Bots that is reusable by scholars and practitioners. Furthermore, we propose a research model based on the decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior, that both validates this definition and allows further insights into the topic of Enterprise Bots. Finally, we conclude by testing this model in a survey at a multi-national company and find that 10 of 12 used constructs are highly reliable.

[1]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  Hierarchy or Activity? The Role of Formal and Informal Influence in Eliciting responses from Enterprise Social Networks , 2014, ECIS.

[2]  Kevin Munger Tweetment Effects on the Tweeted: Experimentally Reducing Racist Harassment , 2017 .

[3]  Alessandro Bogliolo,et al.  The Rise of Bots: A Survey of Conversational Interfaces, Patterns, and Paradigms , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[4]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  Enterprise Digital Nudging: Between adoption gain and unintended rejection , 2018, AMCIS.

[5]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Kristine Dery,et al.  The Digital Workplace Is Key to Digital Innovation , 2017, MIS Q. Executive.

[7]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Kwoting Fang,et al.  The use of a decomposed theory of planned behavior to study Internet banking in Taiwan , 2004, Internet Res..

[9]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[10]  Yair Levy,et al.  Integrating Trust and Computer Self-Efficacy with TAM: AnEmpirical Assessment of Customersâ Acceptance of BankingInformation Systems (BIS) in Jamaica , 2008 .

[11]  Andrea L. Guzman Making AI Safe for Humans: A Conversation with Siri , 2016 .

[12]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  Strategizing information systems-enabled organizational transformation: A transdisciplinary review and new directions , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Martin Egeli Existierende Maturity Models für Digital- und Mobile Business , 2016 .

[14]  A M Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence A.M. Turing , 2007 .

[15]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  Global Adoption of Unified Communication Technologies as Part of Digital Transformation in Organizations : A Cross-Cultural Perspective , 2018 .

[16]  Ariel Woodbury,et al.  How do you feel? , 2014, Nursing.

[17]  Patric R. Spence,et al.  Is that a bot running the social media feed? Testing the differences in perceptions of communication quality for a human agent and a bot agent on Twitter , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Christoph Lattemann,et al.  Virtual Moderation Assistance: Creating Design Guidelines for Virtual Assistants Supporting Creative Workshops , 2018, PACIS.

[19]  Erfassung von Technikbereitschaft,et al.  Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala zur Erfassung von Technikbereitschaft , 2012 .

[20]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  Do Social Bots Dream of Electric Sheep? A Categorisation of Social Media Bot Accounts , 2017, ACIS.

[21]  H. N. Io,et al.  Chatbots and conversational agents: A bibliometric analysis , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM).

[22]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Exploring Factors that Predict Preservice Teachers’ Intentions to Use Web 2.0 Technologies Using Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior , 2012 .

[23]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..