Measurement of polarization curve and development of a unique semi empirical model for description of PEMFC and DMFC performances

In this study, a single polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) in H2/O2 form with an effective dimension of 5I5 cm as well as a single direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) with a dimension of 10I10 cm were fabricated. In an existing test station, the voltage-current density performances of the fabricated PEMFC and DMFC were examined under various operating conditions. As was expected DMFC showed a lower electrical performance which can be attributed to the slower methanol oxidation rate in comparison to the hydrogen oxidation. The results obtained from the cell operation indicated that the temperature has a great effect on the cell performance. At 60oC, the best power output was obtained for PEMFC. There was a drop in the cell voltage beyond 60oC which can be attributed to the reduction of water content inside the membrane. For DMFC, maximum power output was resulted at 64oC. Increasing oxygen stoichiometry and total cell pressure had a marginal effect on the cell performance. The results also revealed that the cell performance improved by increasing pressure differences between anode and cathode. A unified semi-empirical thermodynamic based model was developed to describe the cell voltage as a function of current density for both kinds of fuel cells. The model equation parameters were obtained through a nonlinear fit to the experimental data. There was a good agreement between the experimental data and the model predicted cell performance for both types of fuel cells.

[1]  E. Rideal,et al.  Fuel Cells , 1958, Nature.

[2]  Kan-Lin Hsueh,et al.  Semi-empirical model to elucidate the effect of methanol crossover on direct methanol fuel cell , 2006 .

[3]  Frano Barbir,et al.  PEM Fuel Cells , 2006 .

[4]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[5]  G. Maggio,et al.  An empirical equation for polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC) behaviour , 1999 .

[6]  Duu-Jong Lee,et al.  Experimental study of commercial size proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance , 2011 .

[7]  Keith Scott,et al.  A semi-empirical model of the direct methanol fuel cell performance. Part I. Model development and verification , 2003 .

[8]  C. Chamberlin,et al.  Modeling of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance with an Empirical Equation , 1995 .

[9]  Maher A.R. Sadiq Al-Baghdadi,et al.  Modelling of proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance based on semi-empirical equations , 2005 .

[10]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Effects of operating temperatures on performance and pressure drops for a 256 cm2 proton exchange membrane fuel cell: An experimental study , 2008 .

[11]  Y. Bae,et al.  A semi-empirical cell voltage model for the direct methanol fuel cell: the methanol crossover effect , 2005 .

[12]  Massimo Santarelli,et al.  Parameters estimation of a PEM fuel cell polarization curve and analysis of their behavior with temperature , 2006 .

[13]  Angelika Heinzel,et al.  A review of the state-of-the-art of the methanol crossover in direct methanol fuel cells , 1999 .

[14]  Frano Barbir,et al.  PEM Fuel Cells: Theory and Practice , 2012 .

[15]  Kai Sundmacher,et al.  A model for the liquid feed direct methanol fuel cell , 1999 .

[16]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.