Low and high stimulation frequencies differentially affect automated response selection in the superior parietal cortex – implications for somatosensory area processes

Response inhibition as a central facet of executive functioning is no homogeneous construct. Interference inhibition constitutes a subcomponent of response inhibition and refers to inhibitory control over responses that are automatically triggered by irrelevant stimulus dimensions as measured by the Simon task. While there is evidence that the area-specific modulation of tactile information affects the act of action withholding, effects in the context of interference inhibition remain elusive. We conducted a tactile version of the Simon task with stimuli designed to be predominantly processed in the primary (40 Hz) or secondary (150 Hz) somatosensory cortex. On the basis of EEG recordings, we performed signal decomposition and source localization. Behavioral results reveal that response execution is more efficient when sensory information is mainly processed via SII, compared to SI sensory areas during non-conflicting trials. When accounting for intermingled coding levels by temporally decomposing EEG data, the results show that experimental variations depending on sensory area-specific processing differences specifically affect motor and not sensory processes. Modulations of motor-related processes are linked to activation differences in the superior parietal cortex (BA7). It is concluded that the SII cortical area supporting cognitive preprocessing of tactile input fosters automatic tactile information processing by facilitating stimulus-response mapping in posterior parietal regions.

[1]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[2]  Christian Beste,et al.  Interacting sources of interference during sensorimotor integration processes , 2016, NeuroImage.

[3]  J Mazziotta,et al.  A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and impulsivity: Behavioral and neural basis of response control , 2013, Progress in Neurobiology.

[5]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Expected Value of Control: An Integrative Theory of Anterior Cingulate Cortex Function , 2013, Neuron.

[6]  C. Beste,et al.  Distinguishing stimulus and response codes in theta oscillations in prefrontal areas during inhibitory control of automated responses , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[7]  C. Beste,et al.  A causal role of the right inferior frontal cortex in implementing strategies for multi-component behaviour , 2015, Nature Communications.

[8]  Christian Beste,et al.  Testing interactive effects of automatic and conflict control processes during response inhibition – A system neurophysiological study , 2017, NeuroImage.

[9]  Christian Beste,et al.  Neuronal Intra-Individual Variability Masks Response Selection Differences between ADHD Subtypes—A Need to Change Perspectives , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[10]  C. Beste,et al.  Dissociable electrophysiological subprocesses during response inhibition are differentially modulated by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors , 2016, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[11]  S. Ionta,et al.  Understanding the role of the primary somatosensory cortex: Opportunities for rehabilitation , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Avishai Henik,et al.  In touch with the Simon effect. , 2014, Experimental psychology.

[13]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Somatotopic representation of location: evidence from the Simon effect. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  C. Beste,et al.  RLS patients show better nocturnal performance in the Simon task due to diminished visuo-motor priming , 2018, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  K. Miller Executive functions. , 2005, Pediatric annals.

[16]  C. Beste,et al.  Subliminally and consciously induced cognitive conflicts interact at several processing levels , 2016, Cortex.

[17]  C. Beste,et al.  Psychophysiological mechanisms of interindividual differences in goal activation modes during action cascading. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  Paul Cisek,et al.  Modest gaze-related discharge modulation in monkey dorsal premotor cortex during a reaching task performed with free fixation. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  B. Hommel,et al.  A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task , 2004, Psychological research.

[20]  Sung-Phil Kim,et al.  Frequency-dependent patterns of somatosensory cortical responses to vibrotactile stimulation in humans: A fMRI study , 2013, Brain Research.

[21]  C. Beste,et al.  Specific properties of the SI and SII somatosensory areas and their effects on motor control: a system neurophysiological study , 2018, Brain Structure and Function.

[22]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Exploring the cortical evidence of a sensory-discrimination process. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  Andreas Mueller,et al.  Dissociating action inhibition, conflict monitoring and sensory mismatch into independent components of event related potentials in GO/NOGO task , 2011, NeuroImage.

[24]  R. Romo,et al.  Neuronal correlates of decision-making in secondary somatosensory cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  J. Kaas The functional organization of somatosensory cortex in primates. , 1993, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[26]  C. Beste,et al.  The Basal Ganglia Striosomes Affect the Modulation of Conflicts by Subliminal Information—Evidence from X-Linked Dystonia Parkinsonism , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Christian Beste,et al.  On the effects of multimodal information integration in multitasking , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[28]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  R. Romo,et al.  From sensation to action , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[30]  Birgit Stürmer,et al.  Accessory stimuli affect the emergence of conflict, not conflict control. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[31]  R. Ackerley,et al.  The role of tactile afference in shaping motor behaviour and implications for prosthetic innovation , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Borís Burle,et al.  Linking Theoretical Decision-making Mechanisms in the Simon Task with Electrophysiological Data: A Model-based Neuroscience Study in Humans , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  W. Sommer,et al.  Residue iteration decomposition (RIDE): A new method to separate ERP components on the basis of latency variability in single trials. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[34]  Christian Beste,et al.  The norepinephrine system shows information-content specific properties during cognitive control – Evidence from EEG and pupillary responses , 2017, NeuroImage.

[35]  R. Andersen,et al.  Cognitive Control Signals for Neural Prosthetics , 2004, Science.

[36]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling suggests serial processing of tactile vibratory stimuli in the human somatosensory cortex—An fMRI study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[37]  P L Nunez,et al.  The Spline‐Laplacian in Clinical Neurophysiology: A Method to Improve EEG Spatial Resolution , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[38]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Updating and validating a new framework for restoring and analyzing latency-variable ERP components from single trials with residue iteration decomposition (RIDE). , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[39]  Birte U. Forstmann,et al.  Towards a model-based cognitive neuroscience of stopping – a neuroimaging perspective , 2018, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[40]  Michael Falkenstein,et al.  Alterations in Voluntary Movement Execution in Huntington's Disease Are Related to the Dominant Motor System — Evidence from Event-related Potentials , 2022 .

[41]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Responses of contralateral SI and SII in cat to same-site cutaneous flutter versus vibration. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction , 2005, NeuroImage.

[43]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[44]  R. Andersen,et al.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[45]  Birte U. Forstmann,et al.  Sensory neural pathways revisited to unravel the temporal dynamics of the Simon effect: A model-based cognitive neuroscience approach , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[46]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[47]  P. Haggard,et al.  The Posterior Parietal Cortex Remaps Touch into External Space , 2010, Current Biology.

[48]  J. Hunter Downs,et al.  FMRI mapping of the somatosensory cortex with vibratory stimuli Is there a dependency on stimulus frequency? , 2001, Brain Research.

[49]  D. Tucker,et al.  EEG coherency. I: Statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[50]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[51]  C. Tenke,et al.  Generator localization by current source density (CSD): Implications of volume conduction and field closure at intracranial and scalp resolutions , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[52]  L. Colzato,et al.  On the effects of tyrosine supplementation on interference control in a randomized, double-blind placebo-control trial , 2018, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[53]  M. Fuchs,et al.  A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[54]  Yves Guiard,et al.  The effects of intensity and irrelevant location of a tactile stimulation in a choice reaction time task , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  Scott T Grafton,et al.  Effector selection precedes reach planning in the dorsal parietofrontal cortex. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  Nicholas Wymbs,et al.  Neural correlates of conflict processing , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[57]  C. Beste,et al.  On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[58]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[59]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  What vs. where in touch: an fMRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[60]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  R. Andersen,et al.  Intention, Action Planning, and Decision Making in Parietal-Frontal Circuits , 2009, Neuron.

[62]  Christoph Stahl,et al.  Disentangling common and specific neural subprocesses of response inhibition , 2013, NeuroImage.

[63]  Michiel M. A. Spapé,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Biological Psychology Compatibility-sequence Effects in the Simon Task Reflect Episodic Retrieval but Not Conflict Adaptation: Evidence from Lrp and N2 , 2022 .

[64]  Chun Kee Chung,et al.  Tactile Frequency-Specific High-Gamma Activities in Human Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortices , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[65]  A. Paans,et al.  Brain Activation Related to the Representations of External Space and Body Scheme in Visuomotor Control , 2001, NeuroImage.

[66]  C. Hilgetag,et al.  Attention and control of manual responses in cognitive conflict: Findings from TMS perturbation studies , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[67]  Johan Wessberg,et al.  An fMRI study on cortical responses during active self-touch and passive touch from others , 2012, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[68]  Christina F. Lavallee,et al.  Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. , 2013, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[69]  V. Roessner,et al.  Catecholaminergic Modulation of Conflict Control Depends on the Source of Conflicts , 2018, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[70]  W.J.R. Dunseath,et al.  fMRI of the Responses to Vibratory Stimulation of Digit Tips , 2000, NeuroImage.

[71]  C. Carter,et al.  The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies , 2002, Physiology & Behavior.

[72]  M. Rushworth,et al.  The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[73]  Josep Marco-Pallarés,et al.  Combined ICA-LORETA analysis of mismatch negativity , 2005, NeuroImage.

[74]  Philippe Boulinguez,et al.  Proactive inhibitory control of movement assessed by event-related fMRI , 2008, NeuroImage.

[75]  D. Pandya,et al.  The cortical connectivity of the prefrontal cortex in the monkey brain , 2012, Cortex.

[76]  B. Hommel The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[77]  Gaspare Galati,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in the transition from action preparation to execution , 2017, NeuroImage.

[78]  P. Nunez,et al.  Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[79]  Peter E. Clayson,et al.  Psychometric properties of conflict monitoring and conflict adaptation indices: response time and conflict N2 event-related potentials. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[80]  C. Beste,et al.  Somatosensory lateral inhibition processes modulate motor response inhibition - an EEG source localization study , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[81]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[82]  Christian Beste,et al.  Response selection codes in neurophysiological data predict conjoint effects of controlled and automatic processes during response inhibition , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[83]  Werner Sommer,et al.  A toolbox for residue iteration decomposition (RIDE)—A method for the decomposition, reconstruction, and single trial analysis of event related potentials , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[84]  B. Forstmann,et al.  Frontosubthalamic Circuits for Control of Action and Cognition , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[85]  Andrea Hildebrandt,et al.  Exploiting the intra-subject latency variability from single-trial event-related potentials in the P3 time range: A review and comparative evaluation of methods , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[86]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Testing the stimulus-to-response bridging function of the oddball-P3 by delayed response signals and residue iteration decomposition (RIDE) , 2014, NeuroImage.

[87]  O. Wilhelm,et al.  Individual differences in response conflict adaptations , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[88]  Hartmut Leuthold,et al.  The Simon effect in cognitive electrophysiology: A short review. , 2011, Acta psychologica.