Revenue sharing or profit sharing? An internet production perspective

The booming of Internet economics brings new opportunities for smalland medium-sized product and service providers in e-platforms. Usually, the Internet platform (thereafter “platform”) and Internet providers (thereafter “providers”) operate under a consignment revenue sharing production model. Another production model is profit sharing, under which the platform undertakes part of the providers’ operational costs. Intuitively, common sense conjectures that the platform prefers the revenue sharing model while the providers may prefer the profit sharing scheme. However, this is not the case. In this paper, we compare these two forms of emerging production models with a theoretical framework and investigate both market participants’ performance under different schemes. Starting from the single provider case, we find that the provider has less incentive to operate under the revenue sharing contract when compared with the profit sharing contract. Counter intuitively, we identify the threshold of the cutting ratio above which it is more beneficial for the platform to choose the profit sharing mode. Our results are proved to be robust when the number of the providers increases. A numerical study is provided to illustrate this effect. © 2018 PEI, University of Maribor. All rights reserved.

[1]  J. Byers,et al.  The Rise of the Sharing Economy: Estimating the Impact of Airbnb on the Hotel Industry , 2017 .

[2]  Ying Wei,et al.  Mean-variance analysis of supply chains under wholesale pricing and profit sharing schemes , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  D. Gong,et al.  A reconsidering production coordination: A principal-agent theory-based analysis , 2017 .

[4]  D. Gong,et al.  Modelling the Impacts of Resource Sharing on Supply Chain Efficiency , 2015 .

[5]  Xu Gong,et al.  Forecasting the volatility of crude oil futures using HAR-type models with structural breaks , 2016 .

[6]  P. Pontrandolfo,et al.  Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts , 2004 .

[7]  Fiona Greig,et al.  The Online Platform Economy: Has Growth Peaked? , 2017 .

[8]  Li Jiang,et al.  Capacity Investment Under Postponement Strategies, Market Competition, and Demand Uncertainty , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Jan A. Van Mieghem,et al.  Price Versus Production Postponement: Capacity and Competition , 1999 .

[10]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Chuangxia Huang,et al.  Interaction between oil and US dollar exchange rate: nonlinear causality, time-varying influence and structural breaks in volatility , 2018 .

[12]  J. J. D. Dana,et al.  REVENUE SHARING AND VERTICAL CONTROL IN THE VIDEO RENTAL INDUSTRY , 2003 .

[13]  X. Vives,et al.  Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly , 1984 .

[14]  Yunzeng Wang,et al.  Revenue‐Sharing vs. Wholesale‐Price Contracts in Assembly Systems with Random Demand , 2004 .

[15]  Manu Goyal,et al.  Strategic Technology Choice and Capacity Investment Under Demand Uncertainty , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Taner Bilgiç,et al.  Analysis of a two-stage telecommunication supply chain with technology dependent demand , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  M. Christopher,et al.  An Integrated Model for the Design of Agile Supply Chains. , 2001 .

[18]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Quantity Precommitment and Bertrand Competition Yield Cournot Outcomes , 1983 .

[19]  Gérard P. Cachon Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts , 2003, Supply Chain Management.

[20]  Zuo-Jun Max Shen,et al.  Channel Performance Under Consignment Contract with Revenue Sharing , 2004, Manag. Sci..