Value Creation in University-Firm Research Collaborations: A Matching Approach
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Lippman,et al. A BARGAINING PERSPECTIVE ON RESOURCE ADVANTAGE , 2003 .
[2] Pamela J. Hinds,et al. Team diversity and information use , 2005 .
[3] Waverly W. Ding,et al. When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences1 , 2006, American Journal of Sociology.
[4] Avi Goldfarb,et al. Estimating the Value of Brand Alliances in Professional Team Sports , 2009, Mark. Sci..
[5] G. Ahuja. The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .
[6] Will Mitchell,et al. Complementarity, capabilities, and the boundaries of the firm: the impact of within‐firm and interfirm expertise on concurrent sourcing of complementary components , 2009 .
[7] G. Becker. Chapter Title: a Theory of Marriage a Theory of Marriage , 2022 .
[8] Constance E. Helfat,et al. Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .
[9] Fiona E. Murray. The Oncomouse That Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions1 , 2010, American Journal of Sociology.
[10] Lori Rosenkopf,et al. Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..
[11] Olivier Chatain. Where Do Client-Specific Scope Economies Come from? A Revealed Preference Analysis , 2010 .
[12] Michael R. Darby,et al. GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .
[13] S. Morten,et al. How Smart is Smart Money? A Two-Sided Matching Model of Venture Capital , 2006 .
[14] Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al. Reprinted Article The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995 , 2009 .
[15] I. Cockburn,et al. Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. , 1996, The Rand journal of economics.
[16] Marie C. Thursby,et al. Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .
[17] Jeremy T. Fox. Estimating Matching Games with Transfers , 2008 .
[18] D. Hicks. Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge , 1995 .
[19] Michael Konrad,et al. Biotechnology: The university-industrial complex , 1987, Journal of Genetics.
[20] Andrew A. Toole,et al. Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence , 1999 .
[21] Philippe Aghion,et al. Academic Freedom, Private-Sector Focus, and the Process of Innovation , 2005 .
[22] J. Papastavrou,et al. Accounting for Endogeneity When Assessing Strategy Performance: Does Entry Mode Choice Affect Fdi Survival , 1998 .
[23] Qing Wang,et al. Complexity and the functions of the firm : breadth and depth , 2000 .
[24] Maryann Feldman,et al. Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level , 2008, Organ. Sci..
[25] Jeremy T. Fox. Identification in matching games , 2009, BQGT.
[26] N. Lacetera. Different Missions and Commitment Power in R&D Organization: Theory and Evidence on Industry-University Alliances , 2007 .
[27] Benjamin F. Jones. The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .
[28] I. Cockburn,et al. Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .
[29] Dale T. Mortensen,et al. Matching: Finding a Partner for Life or Otherwise , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.
[30] James J. Anton,et al. Patents, Invalidity, and the Strategic Transmission of Enabling Information , 2003 .
[31] Michelle Gittelman,et al. Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..
[32] Waverly W. Ding,et al. The Determinants of Faculty Patenting Behavior: Demographics or Opportunities? , 2005 .
[33] O. Sorenson,et al. Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .
[34] Alvin E. Roth,et al. Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis , 1990 .
[35] Paula E. Stephan,et al. Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology , 1996 .
[36] Chitru S. Fernando,et al. Wanna Dance? How Firms and Underwriters Choose Each Other , 2004 .
[37] B. Uzzi,et al. The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .
[38] Rachel Croson,et al. The role of incentives and communication in strategic alliances: an experimental investigation , 2009 .
[39] Scott Stern,et al. Is There a Market for Ideas? , 2009 .
[40] D Blumenthal,et al. University-industry research relationships in biotechnology: implications for the university. , 1986, Science.
[41] M. Carree,et al. Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .
[42] Robert A. Lowe. The role and experience of start-ups in commercializing university inventions: Startup licensees at the University of California , 2001 .
[43] Paul Milgrom,et al. Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .
[44] Kira Fabrizio. Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation , 2009 .
[45] Reinhilde Veugelers,et al. In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..
[46] K. Pavitt,et al. Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .
[47] R. Nelson. The market economy, and the scientific commons , 2004 .
[48] E. Mansfield,et al. The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .
[49] J. Hicks,et al. The economics of science , 1996 .
[50] Luigi Orsenigo,et al. The emergence of biotechnology , 1989 .
[51] Daniel W. Elfenbein,et al. Publications, Patents, and the Market for University Inventions , 2006 .
[52] Nathan Rosenberg,et al. Incentives and Focus in University and Industrial Research: The Case of Synthetic Insulin , 1995 .