Value Creation in University-Firm Research Collaborations: A Matching Approach

University-based technological opportunities are often exploited through joint corporate and academic entrepreneurship activities such as university-industry research collaborations. This paper explores the partner attributes that drive the matching of academic scientists and firms involved in these relationships. The paper models the formation of firm-faculty partnership as an endogenous selection process driven by synergy between partners' knowledge-creation capabilities. The main findings indicate that faculty-firm matching is multidimensional: firms and scientists complement each other in publishing capabilities but substitute each other in patenting skills. Furthermore, firms and scientists with specialized knowledge create more value by teaming with more knowledge-diversified partners. The paper contributes to the literature on university-industry knowledge transfer and, more generally, to the literature on alliance formation.

[1]  S. Lippman,et al.  A BARGAINING PERSPECTIVE ON RESOURCE ADVANTAGE , 2003 .

[2]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Team diversity and information use , 2005 .

[3]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences1 , 2006, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Estimating the Value of Brand Alliances in Professional Team Sports , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[5]  G. Ahuja The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[6]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Complementarity, capabilities, and the boundaries of the firm: the impact of within‐firm and interfirm expertise on concurrent sourcing of complementary components , 2009 .

[7]  G. Becker Chapter Title: a Theory of Marriage a Theory of Marriage , 2022 .

[8]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[9]  Fiona E. Murray The Oncomouse That Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions1 , 2010, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Olivier Chatain Where Do Client-Specific Scope Economies Come from? A Revealed Preference Analysis , 2010 .

[12]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[13]  S. Morten,et al.  How Smart is Smart Money? A Two-Sided Matching Model of Venture Capital , 2006 .

[14]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  Reprinted Article The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995 , 2009 .

[15]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. , 1996, The Rand journal of economics.

[16]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[17]  Jeremy T. Fox Estimating Matching Games with Transfers , 2008 .

[18]  D. Hicks Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge , 1995 .

[19]  Michael Konrad,et al.  Biotechnology: The university-industrial complex , 1987, Journal of Genetics.

[20]  Andrew A. Toole,et al.  Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence , 1999 .

[21]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Academic Freedom, Private-Sector Focus, and the Process of Innovation , 2005 .

[22]  J. Papastavrou,et al.  Accounting for Endogeneity When Assessing Strategy Performance: Does Entry Mode Choice Affect Fdi Survival , 1998 .

[23]  Qing Wang,et al.  Complexity and the functions of the firm : breadth and depth , 2000 .

[24]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[25]  Jeremy T. Fox Identification in matching games , 2009, BQGT.

[26]  N. Lacetera Different Missions and Commitment Power in R&D Organization: Theory and Evidence on Industry-University Alliances , 2007 .

[27]  Benjamin F. Jones The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .

[28]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[29]  Dale T. Mortensen,et al.  Matching: Finding a Partner for Life or Otherwise , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  James J. Anton,et al.  Patents, Invalidity, and the Strategic Transmission of Enabling Information , 2003 .

[31]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[32]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Determinants of Faculty Patenting Behavior: Demographics or Opportunities? , 2005 .

[33]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[34]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis , 1990 .

[35]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology , 1996 .

[36]  Chitru S. Fernando,et al.  Wanna Dance? How Firms and Underwriters Choose Each Other , 2004 .

[37]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[38]  Rachel Croson,et al.  The role of incentives and communication in strategic alliances: an experimental investigation , 2009 .

[39]  Scott Stern,et al.  Is There a Market for Ideas? , 2009 .

[40]  D Blumenthal,et al.  University-industry research relationships in biotechnology: implications for the university. , 1986, Science.

[41]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[42]  Robert A. Lowe The role and experience of start-ups in commercializing university inventions: Startup licensees at the University of California , 2001 .

[43]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[44]  Kira Fabrizio Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation , 2009 .

[45]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[46]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[47]  R. Nelson The market economy, and the scientific commons , 2004 .

[48]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[49]  J. Hicks,et al.  The economics of science , 1996 .

[50]  Luigi Orsenigo,et al.  The emergence of biotechnology , 1989 .

[51]  Daniel W. Elfenbein,et al.  Publications, Patents, and the Market for University Inventions , 2006 .

[52]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Incentives and Focus in University and Industrial Research: The Case of Synthetic Insulin , 1995 .