The Roles of Material Transfer Agreements in Genetics Databases and Bio-Banks

In this paper, we will analyse the role (or better the roles) that a specific document, the Material Transfer Agreement (MTA), has accrued in the exchange of bio-materials between research institutions. We will see how fundamental such documents have become in the most recent years, and that an uncontrolled proliferation of them could bring about a highly inefficient market situation. We will further see how standardisation will partially fix the problems connected to the exchange of bio-materials and bio-samples. However, whilst standardisation possesses undeniable advantages, it has to cope with a minimum level of flexibility, otherwise it will not be able to catch the huge varieties of situations involved. We will finally observe, how new digital and web-based collaborative efforts can contribute to achieve such trade-off between standardisation and flexibility.

[1]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research , 2007 .

[2]  S. Hilgartner,et al.  Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. , 2002, JAMA.

[3]  Barriers to Innovation: Intellectual Property Transaction Costs in Scientific Collaboration , 2006 .

[4]  R. Posner,et al.  Economic Analysis of Law , 1974 .

[5]  R. Eisenberg,et al.  Bayh-Dole Reform and the Progress of Biomedicine , 2002, American Scientist.

[6]  W. David Slawson,et al.  Standard Form Contracts and Democratic Control of Lawmaking Power , 1971 .

[7]  Thomas Margoni,et al.  From Music Tracks to Google Maps: Who Owns Computer Generated Works? , 2010, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[8]  Roberto Caso Digital Rights Management : il commercio delle informazioni digitali tra contratto e diritto d'autore , 2006 .

[9]  A. Dove When science rides the MTA. , 2002, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[10]  K. Llewellyn,et al.  The standardization of commercial contracts in English and continental law , 1939 .

[11]  Brian D. Wright,et al.  Patents versus patenting: implications of intellectual property protection for biological research , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  Michael Geist In the Public Interest: The Future of Canadian Copyright Law , 2005 .

[13]  Mark Perry Rights Management Information , 2005 .

[14]  A. Katz,et al.  Standard Form Contracts , 1997 .

[15]  Suzanne L. Holcombe United States Patent and Trademark Office , 2008 .

[16]  Mark Perry,et al.  Copyright and Anti-Circumvention: Growing Pains in a Digital Millennium , 2000 .

[17]  Niva Elkin-Koren,et al.  What Contracts Can't Do: The Limits of Private Ordering in Facilitating a Creative Commons , 2005 .

[18]  M. Wendy Hennequin,et al.  The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It , 2011 .