Word recognition in two languages and orthographies: English and Greek

Word recognition processes of monolingual readers of English and of Greek were examined with respect to the orthographic and syntactic characteristics of each language. Because of Greek's direct letter-to-sound correspondence, which is unlike the indirect representation of English, the possibility was raised of a greater influence of the phonological code in Greek word recognition. Because Greek is an inflected language, whereas English is a word order language, it was also possible that syntax might influence word recognition patterns in the two languages differentially. These cross-linguistic research questions were investigated within the context of a letter cancellation paradigm. The results provide evidence that readers are sensitive to both the orthographic and the linguistic idiosyncrasies of their language. The results are discussed in terms of the orthographic depth hypothesis and the competition model.

[1]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .

[2]  Mark S. Seidenberg.  Reading Complex Words , 1989 .

[3]  Eckart Scheerer,et al.  Visual word recognition in German. , 1987 .

[4]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Word recognition in Serbo-Croatian is phonologically analytic. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Investigating the boundaries of reading units: letter detection in misspelled words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .

[7]  A. Healy,et al.  A secondary-task analysis of a word familiarity effect. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  G. McCloskey.  Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised , 1987 .

[9]  Georgije Lukatela,et al.  Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[10]  M. Adams.  What good is orthographic redundancy , 1980 .

[11]  Robert M. Schindler,et al.  The effect of prose context on visual search for letters , 1978 .

[12]  R Frost,et al.  Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[13]  A. Healy,et al.  Phonetic factors in letter detection: A reevaluation , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[14]  A. Healy,et al.  Detection errors in a task with articulatory suppression: Phonological receding and reading , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[15]  S. Byng,et al.  Prosodic constraints on lexical access in reading , 1986 .

[16]  Dominic W. Massaro,et al.  Letter and Word Perception , 1981 .

[17]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? , 1987 .

[18]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  I. Taylor,et al.  The Psychology of Reading , 1983 .

[20]  K. T. Spoehr,et al.  The role of orthographic and phonotactic rules in perceiving letter patterns. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  M. Clarke.  READING IN SPANISH AND ENGLISH: EVIDENCE FROM ADULT ESL STUDENTS , 1979 .

[22]  G. C. Orden.  A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .

[23]  R. Glushko.  The Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud. , 1979 .

[24]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Lexical access-via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS) , 1979 .

[25]  L. Katz,et al.  Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  M. Just,et al.  The psychology of reading and language comprehension , 1986 .

[27]  R. Treiman,et al.  Units in reading and spelling , 1988 .

[28]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[29]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  The role of syllables in perceptual processing , 1973 .

[30]  Kevin O’Regan,et al.  Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  R. F. Stanners,et al.  Memory representation for morphologically related words. , 1979 .

[32]  M. T. Turvey,et al.  An evaluation of the “basic orthographic syllabic structure” in a phonologically shallow orthography , 1983 .

[33]  L. Colombo.  Lexical stress effect and its interaction with frequency in word pronunciation , 1992 .

[34]  Alice F. Healy,et al.  Proofreading errors on the word the: New evidence on reading units. , 1980 .

[35]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian , 1984 .

[36]  E. Hatch,et al.  Acoustic Scanning and Syntactic Processing Three Reading Experiments — First and Second Language Learners , 1974 .

[37]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Lexical Access via an Orthographic Code? The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS) Reconsidered. , 1983 .

[38]  S. Andrews.  Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects? , 1986 .

[39]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. , 1976 .

[40]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  Not all nonwords are alike: Implications for reading development and theory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[41]  Alice F. Healy,et al.  Detection errors onthe andand: Evidence for reading units larger than the word , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[42]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[43]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[44]  C. Fowler,et al.  The inflected noun system in Serbo-Croatian: Lexical representation of morphological structure , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[45]  A. Healy,et al.  Detection errors on the word the: evidence for reading units larger than letters. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  P. Smith,et al.  Spelling Patterns, Letter Cancellation and the Processing of Text , 1979 .

[47]  R. Treiman,et al.  Are there onset- and rime-like units in printed words? , 1987 .

[48]  Mark S. Seidenberg.  The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems , 1985, Cognition.

[49]  L. Katz,et al.  Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison. , 1987 .

[50]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Naming multisyllabic words. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  On the Relation Between Processing the Roman and the Cyrillic Alphabets: a Preliminary Analysis with Bi-Alphabetical Readers , 1978, Language and speech.

[52]  Veronika Coltheart,et al.  Phonological processes in reading: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[53]  M. Coltheart.  Lexical access in simple reading tasks , 1978 .

[54]  Ronald G. Shapiro,et al.  Letter detection with rapid serial visual presentation: evidence against word superiority at feature extraction. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  D. Corcoran,et al.  An Acoustic Factor in Letter Cancellation , 1966, Nature.