Tissue-Specific Transcriptomics in the Field Cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus

Field crickets (family Gryllidae) frequently are used in studies of behavioral genetics, sexual selection, and sexual conflict, but there have been no studies of transcriptomic differences among different tissue types. We evaluated transcriptome variation among testis, accessory gland, and the remaining whole-body preparations from males of the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus. Non-normalized cDNA libraries from each tissue were sequenced on the Roche 454 platform, and a master assembly was constructed using testis, accessory gland, and whole-body preparations. A total of 940,200 reads were assembled into 41,962 contigs, to which 36,856 singletons (reads not assembled into a contig) were added to provide a total of 78,818 sequences used in annotation analysis. A total of 59,072 sequences (75%) were unique to one of the three tissues. Testis tissue had the greatest proportion of tissue-specific sequences (62.6%), followed by general body (56.43%) and accessory gland tissue (44.16%). We tested the hypothesis that tissues expressing gene products expected to evolve rapidly as a result of sexual selection—testis and accessory gland—would yield a smaller proportion of BLASTx matches to homologous genes in the model organism Drosophila melanogaster compared with whole-body tissue. Uniquely expressed sequences in both testis and accessory gland showed a significantly lower rate of matching to annotated D. melanogaster genes compared with those from general body tissue. These results correspond with empirical evidence that genes expressed in testis and accessory gland tissue are rapidly evolving targets of selection.

[1]  M. Berriman,et al.  Transcriptome analysis of reproductive tissue and intrauterine developmental stages of the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans morsitans) , 2010, BMC Genomics.

[2]  A. Ewing,et al.  Arthropod Bioacoustics: Neurobiology and Behaviour , 1989 .

[3]  W. Swanson,et al.  Identification and comparative analysis of accessory gland proteins in Orthoptera. , 2006, Genome.

[4]  A. Meyer,et al.  Rapid evolution and selection inferred from the transcriptomes of sympatric crater lake cichlid fishes , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[5]  L. Simmons,et al.  Male crickets adjust ejaculate quality with both risk and intensity of sperm competition , 2007, Biology Letters.

[6]  L. Simmons,et al.  Male-derived cuticular hydrocarbons signal sperm competition intensity and affect ejaculate expenditure in crickets , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Juan Miguel García-Gómez,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS APPLICATIONS NOTE Sequence analysis Manipulation of FASTQ data with Galaxy , 2005 .

[8]  Gem Stapleton,et al.  Drawing Area-Proportional Venn-3 Diagrams with Convex Polygons , 2010, Diagrams.

[9]  J. Marden,et al.  Rapid transcriptome characterization for a nonmodel organism using 454 pyrosequencing , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[10]  R R Hoy,et al.  Hybrid cricket auditory behavior: evidence for genetic coupling in animal communication. , 1977, Science.

[11]  R. Wilson,et al.  Comparative genomics based on massive parallel transcriptome sequencing reveals patterns of substitution and selection across 10 bird species , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[12]  Naomi S. Altman,et al.  Comparison of next generation sequencing technologies for transcriptome characterization , 2009, BMC Genomics.

[13]  R. Harrison,et al.  Searching for candidate speciation genes using a proteomic approach: seminal proteins in field crickets , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  W. Swanson,et al.  Molecular evolution of seminal proteins in field crickets. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[15]  M. Marra,et al.  Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies in functional genomics. , 2008, Genomics.

[16]  R. Oliver,et al.  Carbon source accounting for fish using combined DNA and stable isotope analyses in a regulated lowland river weir pool , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[17]  D. Wallace [5] Precipitation of nucleic acids , 1987 .

[18]  L. Simmons,et al.  Calling characteristics of parasitized and unparasitized populations of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  R. Edwards,et al.  Fast Identification and Removal of Sequence Contamination from Genomic and Metagenomic Datasets , 2011, PloS one.

[20]  D. Wallace Precipitation of nucleic acids. , 1987, Methods in enzymology.

[21]  M. Wolfner The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila , 2002, Heredity.

[22]  J. Walters,et al.  EST analysis of male accessory glands from Heliconius butterflies with divergent mating systems , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[23]  H. C. Bennet-Clark,et al.  Wing resonances in the Australian field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[24]  John Quackenbush,et al.  A cricket Gene Index: a genomic resource for studying neurobiology, speciation, and molecular evolution , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[25]  C. Wheat Rapidly developing functional genomics in ecological model systems via 454 transcriptome sequencing , 2010, Genetica.

[26]  Field crickets change mating preferences using remembered social information , 2009, Biology Letters.

[27]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  Genetic Tools for Studying Adaptation and the Evolution of Behavior , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Lee C. Drickamer,et al.  Cricket Behavior and Neurobiology, F. Huber, T.E. Moore, W. Loher (Eds.). Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York (1990), xiii , 1991 .

[29]  J. Walters,et al.  Combined EST and proteomic analysis identifies rapidly evolving seminal fluid proteins in Heliconius butterflies. , 2010, Molecular biology and evolution.