Gender differences of foot characteristics in older Japanese adults using a 3D foot scanner

BackgroundKnowledge of gender differences in foot shape assists shoe manufactures with designing appropriate shoes for men and women. Although gender differences in foot shapes are relatively known among young men and women, less is known about how the older men and women’s feet differ in shape. A recent development in foot shape assessment is the use of 3D foot scanners. To our knowledge this technology has yet to be used to examine gender differences in foot shape of Japanese older adults.MethodsThis cross-sectional study included 151 older men (74.5 ± 5.6 years) and 140 older women (73.9 ± 5.1 years) recruited in Kasama City, Japan. Foot variables were measured in sitting and standing positions using Dream GP Incorporated’s 3D foot scanner, Footstep PRO (Osaka, Japan). Scores were analyzed as both raw and normalized to truncated foot length using independent samples t-test and analysis of covariance, respectively.ResultsIn men, the measurement values for navicular height, first and fifth toe and instep heights, ball and heel width, ball girth, arch height index (just standing), arch rigidity index and instep girth were significantly greater than the women’s, whereas the first toe angle, in both sitting and standing positions was significantly smaller. However, after normalizing, the differences in ball width, heel width, height of first and fifth toes in both sitting and standing and ball girth in sitting position were nonsignificant. According to Cohen’s d, among all the foot variables, the following had large effect sizes in both sitting and standing positions: truncated foot length, instep, navicular height, foot length, ball girth, ball width, heel width and instep girth.ConclusionThis study provides evidence of anthropometric foot variations between older men and women. These differences need to be considered when manufacturing shoes for older adults.

[1]  Francesco Amenta,et al.  Gender and age related differences in foot morphology. , 2014, Maturitas.

[2]  Hylton B Menz,et al.  Age-related differences in foot structure and function. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[3]  Jinsup Song,et al.  The Effect of Gender, Age, and Lateral Dominance on Arch Height and Arch Stiffness , 2006, Foot & ankle international.

[4]  Hylton B Menz,et al.  A protocol for classifying normal- and flat-arched foot posture for research studies using clinical and radiographic measurements , 2009, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[5]  H. Menz,et al.  Foot pain impairs balance and functional ability in community-dwelling older people. , 2001, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[6]  J. R. Rebelatto,et al.  The effect of gender on foot anthropometrics in older people. , 2011, Journal of sport rehabilitation.

[7]  D. Williams,et al.  Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[8]  Ravindra S. Goonetilleke,et al.  Foot measurements from three-dimensional scans: A comparison and evaluation of different methods , 2006 .

[9]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Gender differences in adult foot shape: implications for shoe design. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  L. Staheli,et al.  The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Brody Dm,et al.  Techniques in the evaluation and treatment of the injured runner. , 1982 .

[12]  An ultrasound based non-invasive method for the measurement of intrinsic foot kinematics during gait. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  A Anil,et al.  An examination of the relationship between foot length, foot breath, ball girth, height and weight of Turkish university students aged between 17 and 25. , 1997, Anthropologischer Anzeiger; Bericht uber die biologisch-anthropologische Literatur.

[14]  J B McKinlay,et al.  Prevalence of foot and ankle conditions in a multiethnic community sample of older adults. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  James Woodburn,et al.  The use of 3D surface scanning for the measurement and assessment of the human foot , 2010, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[16]  Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel On Falls Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Falls in Older Persons , 2001 .

[17]  Evaluation of the Function of the Human Foot in Two Different Conditions Using Radiography , 2004 .

[18]  M. J. Muêller,et al.  Navicular drop as a composite measure of excessive pronation. , 1993, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[19]  Timothy E. Kilmartin,et al.  The aetiology of hallux valgus: a critical review of the literature , 1993 .

[20]  Siri Tessem,et al.  Weight distribution in standing and sitting positions, and weight transfer during reaching tasks, in seated stroke subjects and healthy subjects. , 2007, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[21]  Pamela W. Duncan,et al.  Guideline for the Prevention of Falls in Older Persons , 2001 .

[22]  C. Maiwald,et al.  Sex-related differences in foot shape , 2008, Ergonomics.

[23]  C. Frey Foot health and shoewear for women. , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  Makiko Kouchi,et al.  Foot Dimensions and Foot Shape: Differences Due to Growth, Generation and Ethnic Origin , 1998 .

[25]  E. Chantelau,et al.  Foot Dimensions of Elderly People with and without Diabetes mellitus – a Data Basis for Shoe Design , 2002, Gerontology.

[26]  Y. Yoshihuku,et al.  Ethnic differences in forefoot shape and the determination of shoe comfort. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[27]  Hylton B. Menz,et al.  Foot shape of older people: implications for shoe design , 2010 .

[28]  H. Menz,et al.  Home environment risk factors for falls in older people and the efficacy of home modifications. , 2006, Age and ageing.

[29]  Deydre S Teyhen,et al.  Dynamic plantar pressure parameters associated with static arch height index during gait. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[30]  M. Cornwall,et al.  Relationship between static foot posture and foot mobility , 2011, Journal of foot and ankle research.