Pro-environmental employee engagement: the influence of pro-environmental psychological capital, pro-environmental job resources, and perceived corporate environmental responsibility

For organizations to achieve their environmental obligations and objectives, they need employees to actively engage with environmental policies, practices, procedures, and initiatives. Based on engagement theory, a model is proposed that shows how perceived corporate environmental responsibility, pro-environmental job resources, and pro-environmental psychological capital influence employee pro-environmental engagement at work. Survey responses were collected from a Prolific sample of 347 full-time and part-time employees, aged 18–80, working within Australian organizations across a range of occupations. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equations modeling provided broad support for the measures and the relationships proposed in the model. The model explained 64% of the variance in pro-environmental job resources, 90% of the variance in pro-environmental psychological capital, and 92% of the variance in pro-environmental engagement. Overall, the results suggest that for employees to feel enthusiastic and involved in pro-environmental initiatives at work, an integrated approach that takes account of perceived corporate environmental responsibility, pro-environmental job resources, and pro-environmental psychological capital is required. The results also provide brief, defensible measures of pro-environmental PsyCap, pro-environmental job resources and pro-environmental engagement that can be used to assess and target employee attitudes toward pro-environmental initiatives and opportunities. As such, the pro-environmental engagement model can help guide the design and implementation of evidence-based employee-focused interventions that will help achieve environmental sustainability objectives.

[1]  Z. Parray,et al.  The empirical relationship between transformational leadership and job attitudes: mediating role of psychological capital – a study of healthcare in India , 2023, International Journal of Public Leadership.

[2]  M. Leiter,et al.  The Influence of Change-Related Organizational and Job Resources on Employee Change Engagement , 2022, Frontiers in Psychology.

[3]  Syed Arslan Haider,et al.  Greening the Workforce: A Strategic Way to Spur the Environmental Q2 Performance in the Hotel Industry , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[4]  A. Manuti,et al.  “I Like It like That”: A Study on the Relationship between Psychological Capital, Work Engagement and Extra-Role Behavior , 2022, Sustainability.

[5]  S. Albrecht,et al.  Pro-Environmental Employee Engagement: The Influence of Pro-Environmental Organizational, Job and Personal Resources , 2021, Sustainability.

[6]  M. Vignoli,et al.  Work Engagement: A meta-Analysis Using the Job Demands-Resources Model , 2021, Psychological reports.

[7]  E. Lopez-Zafra,et al.  Antecedents of psychological Capital at Work: A Systematic Review of Moderato–mediator Effects and a New Integrative Proposal , 2021, European Management Review.

[8]  S. Russell,et al.  Employee green behaviour: How organizations can help the environment. , 2020, Current opinion in psychology.

[9]  S. Donaldson,et al.  The Generalizability of HERO across 15 Nations: Positive Psychological Capital (PsyCap) beyond the US and Other WEIRD Countries , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[10]  S. Albrecht,et al.  Change Engagement, Change Resources, and Change Demands: A Model for Positive Employee Orientations to Organizational Change , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[11]  M. Aboramadan The effect of green HRM on employee green behaviors in higher education: the mediating mechanism of green work engagement , 2020 .

[12]  Paul R. Yost,et al.  Organizational climate for climate sustainability. , 2020 .

[13]  Flevy Lasrado,et al.  Go green! Exploring the organizational factors that influence self-initiated green behavior in the United Arab Emirates , 2020, Asia Pacific Journal of Management.

[14]  Daniel M. McNeish,et al.  Dynamic fit index cutoffs for confirmatory factor analysis models. , 2020, Psychological methods.

[15]  Juan Wang,et al.  Integrating the Bright and Dark Sides of Corporate Volunteering Climate: Is Corporate Volunteering Climate a Burden or Boost to Employees? , 2020, British Journal of Management.

[16]  S. Geetha,et al.  A systematic review on green human resource management: Implications for social sustainability , 2020 .

[17]  Jian Zhang,et al.  The relationship between pro-environmental attitude and employee green behavior: the role of motivational states and green work climate perceptions , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[18]  G. Maes,et al.  A systems model of organizational change , 2019, Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal.

[19]  Rashid Ahmad,et al.  The nexus of corporate social responsibility (CSR), affective commitment and organisational citizenship behaviour in academia , 2019 .

[20]  D. Hine,et al.  Can work climate foster pro-environmental behavior inside and outside of the workplace? , 2019, PloS one.

[21]  W. Umrani,et al.  The impact of ethical leadership style on job satisfaction , 2019, Leadership & Organization Development Journal.

[22]  G. Ali,et al.  Environmental CSR and pro-environmental behaviors to reduce environmental dilapidation , 2019, Management Research Review.

[23]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  On Corporate Social Responsibility, Sensemaking, and the Search for Meaningfulness Through Work , 2019 .

[24]  J. Lunn,et al.  Testing the relevance, proximal, and distal effects of psychosocial safety climate and social support on job resources: A context-based approach , 2019, Cogent Psychology.

[25]  B. Gusy,et al.  The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies , 2018, Work & Stress.

[26]  H. Zacher,et al.  The relative importance of employee green behavior for overall job performance ratings: A policy‐capturing study , 2018 .

[27]  Sheryl L. Walter,et al.  A Tale of Two Sample Sources: Do Results from Online Panel Data and Conventional Data Converge? , 2018, Journal of Business and Psychology.

[28]  P. Paillé,et al.  Overcoming the barriers to pro-environmental behaviors in the workplace: A systematic review , 2018 .

[29]  S. Albrecht,et al.  Organizational resources, organizational engagement climate, and employee engagement , 2018 .

[30]  A. Bakker,et al.  Job Demands–Resources Theory: Taking Stock and Looking Forward , 2017, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[31]  Catrien J.A.M. Termeer,et al.  Transformational change: governance interventions for climate change adaptation from a continuous change perspective , 2017 .

[32]  Ariel M. Aloe,et al.  Extracting the Variance Inflation Factor and Other Multicollinearity Diagnostics from Typical Regression Results , 2017 .

[33]  Jean‐Pascal Gond,et al.  The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review , 2017 .

[34]  Timo Lorenz,et al.  Measuring Psychological Capital: Construction and Validation of the Compound PsyCap Scale (CPC-12) , 2016, PloS one.

[35]  Scott Tonidandel,et al.  RWA Web: A Free, Comprehensive, Web-Based, and User-Friendly Tool for Relative Weight Analyses , 2014, Journal of Business and Psychology.

[36]  S. Teo,et al.  Employee participation and engagement in working for the environment , 2015 .

[37]  N. Ashkanasy,et al.  Employee Green Behavior , 2015 .

[38]  Neal M. Ashkanasy,et al.  Organisational sustainability policies and employee green behaviour: The mediating role of work climate perceptions , 2014 .

[39]  Ken Kelley,et al.  The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes , 2014, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[40]  Alexander Newman,et al.  Psychological capital: A review and synthesis , 2014 .

[41]  Olivier Boiral,et al.  Linking environmental management practices and organizational citizenship behaviour for the environment: a social exchange perspective , 2013 .

[42]  Despoina Xanthopoulou,et al.  Work engagement among employees facing emotional demands: The role of personal resources. , 2013 .

[43]  Dan S. Chiaburu,et al.  Employees’ Social Context and Change-Oriented Citizenship , 2013 .

[44]  Christopher C. Rosen,et al.  Assessing the impact of common method variance on higher order multidimensional constructs. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  Fred Luthans,et al.  Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Positive Psychological Capital on Employee Attitudes, Behaviors, and Performance. , 2011 .

[46]  Michelle R Simpson,et al.  Engagement at work: a review of the literature. , 2009, International journal of nursing studies.

[47]  Thomas W. H. Ng,et al.  Toward a Further Understanding of the Relationships Between Perceptions of Support and Work Attitudes , 2008 .

[48]  David A Harrison,et al.  Do Peers Make the Place? Conceptual Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of Coworker Effects on Perceptions, Attitudes, OCBs, and Performance , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  James B. Avey,et al.  POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL: MEASUREMENT AND RELATIONSHIP WITH PERFORMANCE AND SATISFACTION , 2007 .

[50]  James B. Avey,et al.  Psychological capital development: toward a micro-intervention , 2006, Journal of Organizational Behavior.

[51]  S. Hobfoll Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[52]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[53]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  The Hierarchical Structure of Self-Concept and the Application of Hierarchical Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 1987 .

[54]  H. Marsh,et al.  Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. , 1985 .

[55]  T. Truong,et al.  Influences of Job Demands, Job Resources, Personal Resources, and Coworkers Support on Work Engagement and Creativity , 2021 .

[56]  J. Nunnally,et al.  Psychometric Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[57]  Bilal Afsar,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and pro‐environmental behavior at workplace: The role of moral reflectiveness, coworker advocacy, and environmental commitment , 2019, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

[58]  A. van den Broeck,et al.  How Colleagues Can Support Each Other's Needs and Motivation: An Intervention on Employee Work Motivation , 2018 .

[59]  Kerrie L. Unsworth,et al.  Increasing Pro-Environmental Behaviors by Increasing Self-Concordance: Testing an Intervention , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[60]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[61]  Fred Luthans,et al.  The power of positive psychology: Psychological capital and work engagement. , 2010 .

[62]  Nerina L Jimmieson,et al.  A longitudinal study of employee adaptation to organizational change: the role of change-related information and change-related self-efficacy. , 2004, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[63]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .