Transfer errors of planning CT to simulator: a possible source of setup inaccuracies?

The purpose of this study was to analyse whether the intended patient setup, based on a CT scan, was different from the setup at the simulator. Furthermore, we investigated how these possible transfer errors between the planned patient setup and the actual simulator setup affected the resulting overall treatment setup accuracy. Two groups, of 15 prostate patients each, were studied. For one group (group II), the simulation time was about twice as large as for the other (group I), since digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) were used to get a good visual agreement between the intended and the simulator setup. For the purpose of this study DRRs were also calculated for the patients in group I, and for both groups DRRs were matched with the simulator images to obtain quantitative data of the transfer errors. The resulting overall treatment setup accuracy was determined by comparing the DRRs with portal images. For group I, the standard deviations (SD) of the differences between the DRRs and the simulator images ('transfer errors') were 1.5 mm and 4.5 mm in the lateral (x) and cranio-caudal (y) direction, respectively. For group II the SDs were smaller: 1.4 mm and 1.5 mm in the x- and y-direction, respectively. For both groups, the magnitude of the overall mean was less than 1.3 mm. For group I, the SDs of the resulting overall setup deviations during treatment were 1.6 mm and 4.1 mm in the x- and y-direction, respectively. For group II, these figures were 2.4 mm and 2.6 mm, respectively. For both groups, the magnitude of the overall mean was less than 1.0 mm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  J Bijhold,et al.  Maximizing setup accuracy using portal images as applied to a conformal boost technique for prostatic cancer. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  A G Visser,et al.  Accuracy in radiation field alignment in head and neck cancer: a prospective study. , 1988, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  M van Herk,et al.  A verification procedure to improve patient set-up accuracy using portal images. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  A Fenster,et al.  Daily monitoring and correction of radiation field placement using a video-based portal imaging system: a pilot study. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  R Mohan,et al.  Clinically relevant optimization of 3-D conformal treatments. , 1992, Medical physics.

[6]  D P Ragan,et al.  CT-based simulation with laser patient marking. , 1993, Medical physics.

[7]  M Coghe,et al.  Routine clinical on-line portal imaging followed by immediate field adjustment using a tele-controlled patient couch. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  M van Herk,et al.  First clinical experience with a newly developed electronic portal imaging device. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  D L McShan,et al.  Boost treatment of the prostate using shaped, fixed fields. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  S. Griffiths,et al.  Quality control of radiotherapy during pelvic irradiation. , 1991, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  M. Goitein,et al.  Accuracy of radiation field alignment in clinical practice. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  M. van Herk,et al.  Physical aspects of a liquid-filled ionization chamber with pulsed polarizing voltage. , 1991 .

[13]  J. Lebesque,et al.  The simultaneous boost technique: the concept of relative normalized total dose. , 1991, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  M van Herk,et al.  Radiation field edge detection in portal images. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  E. Chaney,et al.  The portable virtual simulator. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  M van Herk,et al.  A matrix ionisation chamber imaging device for on-line patient setup verification during radiotherapy. , 1988, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  M van Herk,et al.  An algorithm for automatic analysis of portal images: clinical evaluation for prostate treatments. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  M van Herk,et al.  Automatic on-line inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using digital portal images. , 1993, Medical physics.

[19]  M van Herk,et al.  Fast evaluation of patient set-up during radiotherapy by aligning features in portal and simulator images. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.