Digital Distractions from the Point of View of Higher Education Students

Technology enables a more sustainable and universally accessible educational model. However, technology has brought a paradox into students’ lives: it helps them engage in learning activities, but it is also a source of distraction. During the academic year 2021–2022, the authors conducted a study focusing on classroom distractions. One of the objectives was to identify the main digital distractions from the point of view of students. The study was carried out at an engineering school, where technology is fully integrated in the classroom and in the academic routines of teachers and students. Discussions and surveys, complemented by a statistical study based on bivariate correlations, were used with participating students (n = 105). Students considered digital distractions to have a significant impact on their performance in lab sessions. This performance was mainly self-assessed as improvable. Contrary to other contemporary research, the results were not influenced by the year of study of the subject, as the issue is important regardless of the students’ backgrounds. Professors should implement strategies to raise students’ awareness of the significant negative effects of digital distractions on their performance, as well as to develop students’ self-control skills. This is of vital importance for the use of technology to be sustainable in the long-term.

[1]  O. Hatlevik,et al.  Examining the relationship between resilience to digital distractions, ICT self-efficacy, motivation, approaches to studying, and time spent on individual studies , 2021 .

[2]  S. Schmidt.  Distracted learning: Big problem and golden opportunity , 2020 .

[3]  Alexander J. Dontre.  The influence of technology on academic distraction: A review , 2020, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies.

[4]  Abraham E. Flanigan,et al.  The impact of digital distraction on lecture note taking and student learning , 2020, Instructional Science.

[5]  Tara T. Lineweaver,et al.  On or off task: The negative influence of laptops on neighboring students' learning depends on how they are used , 2020, Comput. Educ..

[6]  James Derounian,et al.  Mobiles in class? , 2020 .

[7]  Adeneye Olarewaju Adeleye Awofala,et al.  Investigating Digital Distraction among Pre-service Science, Technology, and Mathematics Teachers in Nigeria , 2020 .

[8]  Eric Jamet,et al.  Does multitasking in the classroom affect learning outcomes? A naturalistic study , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Alf Inge Wang,et al.  The effect of using Kahoot! for learning - A literature review , 2020, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Zhenya Tang,et al.  Understanding the determinants of digital distraction: An automatic thinking behavior perspective , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  J. Jalil,et al.  MOBILE PHONE USAGE AND DISTRACTION IN LEARNING SESSIONS , 2019 .

[12]  E. Lógó,et al.  The Effect of the Kahoot Quiz on the Student's Results in the Exam , 2019, Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences.

[13]  Lauren R. Elliott-Dorans.  To ban or not to ban? The effect of permissive versus restrictive laptop policies on student outcomes and teaching evaluations , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Papia Bawa.  Using Kahoot to Inspire , 2018, Journal of Educational Technology Systems.

[15]  A. Glass,et al.  Dividing attention in the classroom reduces exam performance , 2018, Educational Psychology.

[16]  Sherlock A. Licorish,et al.  Students’ perception of Kahoot!’s influence on teaching and learning , 2018, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[17]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Using technology to promote classroom instruction: assessing incidences of on-task and off-task multitasking and learning , 2018, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[18]  Abraham E. Flanigan,et al.  What College Instructors Can Do About Student Cyber-slacking , 2017, Educational Psychology Review.

[19]  Lynn S. Aaron,et al.  Digital Distraction: Shedding Light on the 21st-Century College Classroom , 2018 .

[20]  Jinnan Wu,et al.  Student Cyberloafing In and Out of the Classroom in China and the Relationship with Student Performance , 2018, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[21]  Anastasia Elder,et al.  Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance , 2018, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

[22]  Julia Ferrari,et al.  The Necessity of Advancing Our Knowledge On Assistive Technologies To Better Support Students With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder , 2017 .

[23]  P. Kirschner,et al.  The myths of the digital native and the multitasker , 2017 .

[24]  Corey Seemiller,et al.  Curbing Digital Distractions in the Classroom , 2017 .

[25]  L. Baig,et al.  The potential effect of technology and distractions on undergraduate students’ concentration , 2017, Pakistan journal of medical sciences.

[26]  Mercedes Castro-Nuño,et al.  To take or not to take the laptop or tablet to classes, that is the question , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Wilfred W. F. Lau,et al.  Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Eric Sanchez,et al.  Classcraft: from gamification to ludicization of classroom management , 2017, Education and Information Technologies.

[29]  Mitchell G. Uitvlugt,et al.  Logged In and Zoned Out , 2017, Psychological science.

[30]  Punya Mishra,et al.  Preference for multitasking, technological dependency, student metacognition, & pervasive technology use: An experimental intervention , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  N. Selwyn.  Digital downsides: exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology , 2016 .

[32]  Karen L. Siedlecki,et al.  An Examination of Students' Use of Technology for Non-Academic Purposes in the College Classroom , 2016 .

[33]  Shan Xu,et al.  Media multitasking and well-being of university students , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Saraswathi Bellur,et al.  Make it our time: In class multitaskers have lower academic performance , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Jesper Aagaard,et al.  Drawn to distraction: A qualitative study of off-task use of educational technology , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[36]  Sacip Toker,et al.  An investigation of the impact of demographics on cyberloafing from an educational setting angle , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  Sima Sayadian,et al.  University instructors' concerns and perceptions of technology integration , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Cary Stothart,et al.  The attentional cost of receiving a cell phone notification. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  Jeffrey H. Kuznekoff,et al.  Mobile Phones in the Classroom: Examining the Effects of Texting, Twitter, and Message Content on Student Learning , 2015 .

[40]  Eric D. Ragan,et al.  Unregulated use of laptops over time in large lecture classes , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[41]  Stephanie Dietz,et al.  Texting as a distraction to learning in college students , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Ravi Nath,et al.  Determinants of Digital Distraction: A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Users In Africa, China and The U.S. , 2014, Journal of International Technology and Information Management.

[43]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  The Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale: An empirical investigation , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Halil Yurdugül,et al.  The Investigation of Relation Between Cyberloafing Activities and Cyberloafing Behaviors in Higher Education , 2013 .

[45]  David Rosengrant,et al.  Following student gaze patterns in physical science lectures , 2012 .

[46]  D. Tindell,et al.  The Use and Abuse of Cell Phones and Text Messaging in the Classroom: A Survey of College Students , 2012 .

[47]  B. W. Yap,et al.  Comparisons of various types of normality tests , 2011 .

[48]  Diane M. Bunce,et al.  How Long Can Students Pay Attention in Class? A Study of Student Attention Decline Using Clickers , 2010 .

[49]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Mind your E-manners: Impact of cyber incivility on employees' work attitude and behavior , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[50]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[51]  James L. Fitch,et al.  Student feedback in the college classroom: A technology solution , 2004 .

[52]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[53]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[54]  Janice C. Sipior,et al.  A Strategic Response to the Broad Spectrum of Internet Abuse , 2002 .

[55]  N. Lavie.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  J. Rodgers,et al.  Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient , 1988 .

[57]  A. Welford.  THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .

[58]  Digital Distractions in the College Classroom , 2022, Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development.

[59]  Mary Jorgensen,et al.  “Simply the best”: Professors nominated by students for their exemplary technology practices in teaching , 2017, Education and Information Technologies.

[60]  Remco C. Veltkamp,et al.  Games and Learning Alliance , 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[61]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control. , 2014, Psychological review.

[62]  Bernard R. McCoy,et al.  Digital Distractions in the Classroom: Student Classroom Use of Digital Devices for Non-Class Related Purposes , 2013 .

[63]  Karin Archer,et al.  Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[64]  J. Wintera,et al.  Effective e-learning ? Multi-tasking , distractions and boundary management by graduate students in an online environment , 2010 .

[65]  Teresa Martín-Blas,et al.  The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[66]  Michaela Driver,et al.  Exploring student perceptions of group interaction and class satisfaction in the web-enhanced classroom , 2002, Internet High. Educ..