Preclinical Evidence that Use of TRAIL in Ewing's Sarcoma and Osteosarcoma Therapy Inhibits Tumor Growth, Prevents Osteolysis, and Increases Animal Survival

Purpose: Osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma are high-grade neoplasms typically arising in the bones of children and adolescents. Despite improvement in therapy, the five-year survival rate is only 20% for patients not responding to treatment or presenting with metastases. Among new therapeutic strategies, the efficacy of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)–related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a member of the TNF superfamily with strong antitumoral activity and minimal toxicity to most normal cells and tissues, was investigated by complementary approaches both in vitro and in preclinical models. Experimental design: The sensitivity of osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines to TRAIL was investigated in vitro by determining TRAIL receptor expression together with TRAIL effects on cell viability and apoptosis. Complementary preclinical studies were carried out in respective tumor models by inoculation of osteosarcoma or Ewing’s sarcoma tumor cells in paraosseous location. In addition, a model of lung nodule dissemination was developed by i.v. injection of osteosarcoma cells. Results: In vitro, both osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma cells that express the TRAIL death receptors were highly sensitive to TRAIL-induced caspase-8–mediated apoptosis. TRAIL administered in vivo by nonviral gene therapy inhibited primary bone tumor incidence and growth by 87% and prevented tumor-induced osteolysis, leading to a significant 2-fold increase in animal survival 40 days after tumor induction. Furthermore, TRAIL inhibited tumor nodule dissemination in lungs and increased survival in an osteosarcoma model. Conclusion: These findings suggest that TRAIL is a promising candidate for the development of new therapeutic strategies in the most frequent malignant primary bone tumors. Clin Cancer Res; 16(8); 2363–34. ©2010 AACR.

[1]  S. de Jong,et al.  TRAIL receptor signalling and modulation: Are we on the right TRAIL? , 2009, Cancer treatment reviews.

[2]  F. Kruyt TRAIL and cancer therapy. , 2008, Cancer letters.

[3]  G. Longton,et al.  TRAIL-R deficiency in mice enhances lymph node metastasis without affecting primary tumor development. , 2008, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[4]  R. Plummer,et al.  Phase 1 and Pharmacokinetic Study of Lexatumumab in Patients with Advanced Cancers , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  B. Pitard,et al.  Therapeutic relevance of osteoprotegerin gene therapy in osteosarcoma: blockade of the vicious cycle between tumor cell proliferation and bone resorption. , 2007, Cancer research.

[6]  N. Athanasou,et al.  Cellular and humoral mechanisms of osteoclast formation in Ewing's sarcoma , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  J. Eberle,et al.  Resistance of melanoma cells to TRAIL does not result from upregulation of antiapoptotic proteins by NF-κB but is related to downregulation of initiator caspases and DR4 , 2007, Oncogene.

[8]  A. Tolcher,et al.  Phase I pharmacokinetic and biologic correlative study of mapatumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody with agonist activity to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor-1. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  F. Gouin,et al.  Recent advances in the management of osteosarcoma and forthcoming therapeutic strategies , 2007, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[10]  P. Picci Osteosarcoma (Osteogenic sarcoma) , 2007, Orphanet journal of rare diseases.

[11]  P. Marini Drug evaluation: lexatumumab, an intravenous human agonistic mAb targeting TRAIL receptor 2. , 2006, Current opinion in molecular therapeutics.

[12]  E. Steliarova-Foucher,et al.  Bone tumours in European children and adolescents, 1978-1997. Report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[13]  I. Holen,et al.  Role of osteoprotegerin (OPG) in cancer. , 2006, Clinical science.

[14]  M. Heymann,et al.  Zoledronic acid suppresses lung metastases and prolongs overall survival of osteosarcoma‐bearing mice , 2005, Cancer.

[15]  B. Fang,et al.  Mechanisms of resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis in cancer , 2005, Cancer Gene Therapy.

[16]  Karen Billeci,et al.  Receptor-selective Mutants of Apoptosis-inducing Ligand 2/Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand Reveal a Greater Contribution of Death Receptor (DR) 5 than DR4 to Apoptosis Signaling* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  C. Thiele,et al.  Interferon γ Enhances the Effectiveness of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis–Inducing Ligand Receptor Agonists in a Xenograft Model of Ewing’s Sarcoma , 2004, Cancer Research.

[18]  J. Chirgwin,et al.  Tumor-bone cellular interactions in skeletal metastases. , 2004, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[19]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Apo2 Ligand/Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand Cooperates with Chemotherapy to Inhibit Orthotopic Lung Tumor Growth and Improve Survival , 2004, Cancer Research.

[20]  Marc Nasoff,et al.  Synthetic lethal targeting of MYC by activation of the DR5 death receptor pathway. , 2004, Cancer cell.

[21]  S. Shankar,et al.  The sequential treatment with ionizing radiation followed by TRAIL/Apo-2L reduces tumor growth and induces apoptosis of breast tumor xenografts in nude mice. , 2004, International journal of oncology.

[22]  Wafik S El-Deiry,et al.  TRAIL and apoptosis induction by TNF-family death receptors , 2003, Oncogene.

[23]  Tomoyuki Saito,et al.  Inhibition of lung metastasis of osteosarcoma cell line POS-1 transplanted into mice by thigh ligation. , 2002, Cancer letters.

[24]  L. Shultz,et al.  Establishment and characterization of a new osteogenic cell line (MOS-J) from a spontaneous C57BL/6J mouse osteosarcoma. , 2002, In vivo.

[25]  A. Evdokiou,et al.  Chemotherapeutic agents sensitize osteogenic sarcoma cells, but not normal human bone cells, to apo2l/trail‐induced apoptosis , 2002, International journal of cancer.

[26]  J. Goldblum,et al.  Expression of Fli-1, a Nuclear Transcription Factor, Distinguishes Vascular Neoplasms From Potential Mimics , 2001, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[27]  O. Delattre,et al.  Analysis of the expression of cell cycle regulators in Ewing cell lines: EWS-FLI-1 modulates p57KIP2 and c-Myc expression , 2001, Oncogene.

[28]  C. Niemeyer,et al.  Sensitivity of Ewing's sarcoma to TRAIL-induced apoptosis , 2001, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[29]  S. S. Strom,et al.  Differential hepatocyte toxicity of recombinant Apo2L/TRAIL versions , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[30]  N. Mitsiades,et al.  Ewing's sarcoma family tumors are sensitive to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and express death receptor 4 and death receptor 5. , 2001, Cancer research.

[31]  C. Férec,et al.  Cation substitution in cationic phosphonolipids: a new concept to improve transfection activity and decrease cellular toxicity. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[32]  P. Lollini,et al.  Murine model for skeletal metastases of Ewing's sarcoma , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[33]  A. Craft,et al.  Prognostic factors in Ewing's tumor of bone: analysis of 975 patients from the European Intergroup Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study Group. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  C. Férec,et al.  Systemic administration of cationic phosphonolipids/DNA complexes and the relationship between formulation and lung transfection efficiency. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[35]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Safety and antitumor activity of recombinant soluble Apo2 ligand. , 1999, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[36]  H. Jürgens,et al.  Deskriptive Epidemiologie der Ewing-Tumoren - Analysen der deutschen Patienten von (EI) CESS 1980-1997* , 1999 .

[37]  M. Cohen,et al.  Visual presentation of the staging of pediatric solid tumors. , 1996, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[38]  C. Denny,et al.  Ewing sarcoma 11;22 translocation produces a chimeric transcription factor that requires the DNA-binding domain encoded by FLI1 for transformation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  M. Santamaría,et al.  The neuroectodermal tumor of bone , 1984, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[40]  B. Klein,et al.  Studies of bone and soft‐tissue tumours induced in rats with radioactive cerium chloride , 1977, International journal of cancer.

[41]  F. Graham,et al.  Characteristics of a human cell line transformed by DNA from human adenovirus type 5. , 1977, The Journal of general virology.

[42]  J. Ewing Diffuse endothelioma of bone , 1972 .

[43]  S Paget,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF SECONDARY GROWTHS IN CANCER OF THE BREAST. , 1889 .

[44]  D. Heymann,et al.  RANKL directly induces bone morphogenetic protein-2 expression in RANK-expressing POS-1 osteosarcoma cells. , 2006, International journal of oncology.

[45]  A. Evdokiou,et al.  Death to the bad guys: Targeting cancer via Apo2L/TRAIL , 2005, Apoptosis.

[46]  N. Liabakk,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies against TRAIL. , 2004, Vitamins and hormones.

[47]  中谷 文彦 Identification of p21WAF1/CIP1 as a direct target of EWS-Fli1 oncogenic fusion protein , 2004 .

[48]  M. Urioste,et al.  Short communication Characterization of the A673 cell line (Ewing tumor) by molecular cytogenetic techniques , 2003 .

[49]  J. Chirgwin,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of tumor-bone interactions in osteolytic metastases. , 2000, Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression.

[50]  H. Hense,et al.  [Descriptive epidemiology of Ewing's tumor--analysis of German patients from (EI)CESS 1980-1997]. , 1999, Klinische Padiatrie.