Architectural considerations for next generation file systems

We evaluate two architectural alternatives—partitioned and integrated—for designing next generation file systems. Whereas a partitioned server employs a separate file system for each application class, an integrated file server multiplexes its resources among all application classes; we evaluate the performance of the two architectures with respect to sharing of disk bandwidth among the application classes. We show that although the problem of sharing disk bandwidth in integrated file systems is conceptually similar to that of sharing network link bandwidth in integrated services networks, the arguments that demonstrate the superiority of integrated services networks over separate networks are not applicable to file systems. Furthermore, we show that: (i) an integrated server outperforms the partitioned server in a large operating region and has slightly worse performance in the remaining region, (ii) the capacity of an integrated server is larger than that of the partitioned server, and (iii) an integrated server outperforms the partitioned server by up to a factor of 6 in the presence of bursty workloads.