Quantitative assessment of energy and resource recovery in wastewater treatment plants based on plant-wide simulations.

The growing development of technologies and processes for resource treatment and recovery is offering endless possibilities for creating new plant-wide configurations or modifying existing ones. However, the configurations' complexity, the interrelation between technologies and the influent characteristics turn decision-making into a complex or unobvious process. In this frame, the Plant-Wide Modelling (PWM) library presented in this paper allows a thorough, comprehensive and refined analysis of different plant configurations that are basic aspects in decision-making from an energy and resource recovery perspective. In order to demonstrate the potential of the library and the need to run simulation analyses, this paper carries out a comparative analysis of WWTPs, from a techno-economic point of view. The selected layouts were (1) a conventional WWTP based on a modified version of the Benchmark Simulation Model No. 2, (2) an upgraded or retrofitted WWTP, and (3) a new Wastewater Resource Recovery Facilities (WRRF) concept denominated as C/N/P decoupling WWTP. The study was based on a preliminary analysis of the organic matter and nutrient energy use and recovery options, a comprehensive mass and energy flux distribution analysis in each configuration in order to compare and identify areas for improvement, and a cost analysis of each plant for different influent COD/TN/TP ratios. Analysing the plants from a standpoint of resources and energy utilization, a low utilization of the energy content of the components could be observed in all configurations. In the conventional plant, the COD used to produce biogas was around 29%, the upgraded plant was around 36%, and 34% in the C/N/P decoupling WWTP. With regard to the self-sufficiency of plants, achieving self-sufficiency was not possible in the conventional plant, in the upgraded plant it depended on the influent C/N ratio, and in the C/N/P decoupling WWTP layout self-sufficiency was feasible for almost all influents, especially at high COD concentrations. The plant layouts proposed in this paper are just a sample of the possibilities offered by current technologies. Even so, the library presented here is generic and can be used to construct any other plant layout, provided that a model is available.

[1]  George Tchobanoglous,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery , 2013 .

[2]  Gürkan Sin,et al.  An integrated knowledge-based and optimization tool for the sustainable selection of wastewater treatment process concepts , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  Karel J. Keesman,et al.  Energy and nutrient recovery for municipal wastewater treatment: How to design a feasible plant layout? , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[4]  B. Jefferson,et al.  Coagulation of NOM: linking character to treatment. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  J Keller,et al.  Platforms for energy and nutrient recovery from domestic wastewater: A review. , 2015, Chemosphere.

[6]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[7]  A B Bisinella de Faria,et al.  Evaluation of new alternatives in wastewater treatment plants based on dynamic modelling and life cycle assessment (DM-LCA). , 2015, Water research.

[8]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  A new plant-wide modelling methodology for WWTPs. , 2007, Water research.

[9]  Jerald G. Fishman Energy management. , 1982, Hospital development.

[10]  M. Fdz-Polanco,et al.  Continuous thermal hydrolysis and energy integration in sludge anaerobic digestion plants. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  Hansruedi Siegrist,et al.  Effect of heat recovery from raw wastewater on nitrification and nitrogen removal in activated sludge plants. , 2005, Water research.

[12]  Jan Hofman,et al.  The potential of (waste)water as energy carrier , 2013 .

[13]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Model-based comparative assessment of innovative processes , 2017 .

[14]  Jeonghwan Kim,et al.  Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer--can this be achieved? , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  P Grau,et al.  A new general methodology for incorporating physico-chemical transformations into multi-phase wastewater treatment process models. , 2015, Water research.

[16]  S I Perez Elvira,et al.  SLUDGE MINIMIZATION TECHNOLOGIES , 2006 .

[17]  Veera Gnaneswar Gude,et al.  Energy and water autarky of wastewater treatment and power generation systems , 2015 .

[18]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Plant-wide (BSM2) evaluation of reject water treatment with a SHARON-Anammox process. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[19]  David Jenkins,et al.  Activated Sludge – 100 Years and Counting , 2014 .

[20]  A. Sbrilli,et al.  Mass and energy balances of sludge processing in reference and upgraded wastewater treatment plants , 2015, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[21]  J S Guest,et al.  Energy positive domestic wastewater treatment: the roles of anaerobic and phototrophic technologies. , 2014, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[22]  J M Garrido,et al.  Working with energy and mass balances: a conceptual framework to understand the limits of municipal wastewater treatment. , 2013, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[23]  M. B. Beck,et al.  A New Planning and Design Paradigm to Achieve Sustainable Resource Recovery from Wastewater. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  T. Fernández Arévalo,et al.  New heat transfer and operating cost models for the Plant-Wide simulation of full-scale WWTPs. , 2017 .

[25]  P Grau,et al.  New systematic methodology for incorporating dynamic heat transfer modelling in multi-phase biochemical reactors. , 2014, Water research.

[26]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Maximum use of resources present in domestic "used water". , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[27]  Avril Higton,et al.  Access to Chemistry , 1999 .

[28]  Manel Poch,et al.  Including the environmental criteria when selecting a wastewater treatment plant , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[29]  Arif Hepbasli,et al.  A key review of wastewater source heat pump (WWSHP) systems , 2014 .

[30]  Geert-Jan Witkamp,et al.  The Relevance of Phosphorus and Iron Chemistry to the Recovery of Phosphorus from Wastewater: A Review. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  S. I. Pérez-Elvira,et al.  Sludge minimisation technologies , 2006 .

[32]  Bruce E Logan,et al.  Extracting hydrogen and electricity from renewable resources. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Charles Bott,et al.  High-rate activated sludge system for carbon management--Evaluation of crucial process mechanisms and design parameters. , 2015, Water research.

[34]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Can direct conversion of used nitrogen to new feed and protein help feed the world? , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  Peter A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Chemically enhancing primary clarifiers: model-based development of a dosing controller and full-scale implementation. , 2017, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[36]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 , 2015 .

[37]  Leonid N. Alekseiko,et al.  Combination of wastewater treatment plants and heat pumps , 2014 .

[38]  P Grau,et al.  Diagnosis and optimization of WWTPs using the PWM library: full-scale experiences. , 2017, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[39]  E. Schroeder,et al.  Activated sludge. , 1975, Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation.

[40]  O. Nowak,et al.  Examples of energy self-sufficient municipal nutrient removal plants. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[41]  D. Batstone,et al.  The role of anaerobic digestion in the emerging energy economy. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[42]  P. A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Dynamic mass balancing for wastewater treatment data quality control using CUSUM charts. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[43]  C Puchongkawarin,et al.  Optimization-based methodology for the development of wastewater facilities for energy and nutrient recovery. , 2015, Chemosphere.

[44]  E I P Volcke,et al.  Effect of foam on temperature prediction and heat recovery potential from biological wastewater treatment. , 2016, Water research.

[45]  Th.N. Zwietering Suspending of solid particles in liquid by agitators , 1958 .

[46]  Veera Gnaneswar Gude,et al.  Role of membranes in bioelectrochemical systems , 2015 .

[47]  D. Jenkins,et al.  The Effects of MCRT and Temperature on Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal , 1992 .

[48]  Julian Sandino,et al.  Energy Efficiency in Wastewater Treatment in North America: A Compendium of Best Practices and Case Studies of Novel Approaches: A Compendium of Best Practices and Case Studies of Novel Approaches , 2011 .

[49]  P Grau,et al.  BSM2 Plant-Wide Model construction and comparative analysis with other methodologies for integrated modelling. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[50]  P. Lant,et al.  Comprehensive life cycle inventories of alternative wastewater treatment systems. , 2010, Water research.

[51]  O Nowak,et al.  Benchmarks for the energy demand of nutrient removal plants. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.