Why is joint knowledge production such a problem

Analysing knowledge use in policy processes around contested topics requires a new research approach. Traditional research on knowledge for policy assumes a one-to-one relationship (which is often imperfect) between science and policy as two separate worlds. Science, technology and society studies teach us that knowledge for policy is a joint construct of the research and the policy community and is not produced in isolated worlds. This article argues that the main problem for knowledge use lies in the subdivision between different competing ‘knowledge coalitions’ of researchers and policy-makers. Conflicting knowledge is the result. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

[1]  Research and Technology for Development (RTD) through the EU-ACP Policy Dialogue. Scientific background, Methodology, and Toolbox , 2001 .

[2]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems , 1999 .

[3]  J. R. Ravets,et al.  Post-Normal Science , 2006 .

[4]  S. Woolgar.  Social basis of interactive social science , 2000 .

[5]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Introducing interactive social science , 2000 .

[6]  Martin O'Connor,et al.  Science for the Twenty‐First Century: From Social Contract to the Scientific Core , 2001 .

[7]  Clark A. Miller.  Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime , 2001 .

[8]  B. Marchi,et al.  The crisis of scientific expertise in fin de siècle Europe , 1995 .

[9]  I. Janis.  Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[10]  Michael Huberman,et al.  Research utilization: The state of the art , 1994 .

[11]  P. Groenewegen.  Accommodating Science to External Demands: The Emergence of Dutch Toxicology , 2002 .

[12]  Nathan Caplan,et al.  The Two-Communities Theory and Knowledge Utilization , 1979 .

[13]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[14]  G. Busenberg,et al.  Collaborative and adversarial analysis in environmental policy , 1999 .

[15]  C. Weiss.  Using social research in public policy making , 1979 .

[16]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Dealing with Wicked Problems in Networks: Analyzing an Environmental Debate from a Network Perspective , 2003 .

[17]  Massimo Cellerino,et al.  The New Constellation: The Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity , 1993 .

[18]  T. Gieryn,et al.  Boundaries of Science , 1995 .

[19]  John M. Watkins,et al.  A postmodern critical theory of research use , 1994 .

[20]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[21]  David H. Guston,et al.  Principal-agent theory and the structure of science policy , 1996 .

[22]  Simon Shackley,et al.  Reconceiving Science and Policy: Academic, Fiducial and Bureaucratic Knowledge , 1999 .

[23]  Joop Koppenjan,et al.  Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector , 1997 .

[24]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[25]  C. Krueck,et al.  Science in Politics: A Comparison of Climate Modelling Centres , 1999, Minerva.

[26]  M. Albornoz.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[27]  William N. Dunn,et al.  Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction , 1993 .

[28]  Simon Shackley,et al.  Anchoring Devices in Science for Policy , 1998 .

[29]  R. I. Veld,et al.  Willingly and knowingly : the roles of knowledge about nature and the environment in policy processes , 2000 .

[30]  C. Lindblom,et al.  Usable Knowledge, Social Science and Social Problem Solving , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[31]  P. Sabatier.  An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein , 1988 .

[32]  C. P. Snow.  The two cultures : and a second look : an expanded version of 'The two cultures and the scientific revolution' , 1963 .

[33]  SIMON SHACKLEY,et al.  An Interdisciplinary Study of Flux Adjustments in Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Models , 1999 .

[34]  Martin Kaupenjohann,et al.  Parameters, prediction, post-normal science and the precautionary principle: a roadmap for modelling for decision-making , 2001 .

[35]  Nico Stehr.  Practical Knowledge: Applying the Social Sciences , 1992 .

[36]  J. A. de Bruijn,et al.  Scientific expertise in complex decision-making processes , 1999 .

[37]  B. Latour.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[38]  Ytsen Deelstra,et al.  Using knowledge for decision-making purposes in the context of large projects in The Netherlands , 2003 .

[39]  M. V. Eeten,et al.  ‘Dialogues of the deaf’ on science in policy controversies , 1999 .

[40]  John R. Ehrmann,et al.  Joint Fact-Finding and the Use of Technical Experts , 1999 .

[41]  A. Kazancigil,et al.  Governance and science: market‐like modes of managing society and producing knowledge , 1998 .

[42]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[43]  R. Hoppe,et al.  Policy analysis, science and politics: from ‘speaking truth to power’ to ‘making sense together’ , 1999 .