Performance Comparison of Routing Protocols Based on Different Models in Mobile Adhoc Network

The main characteristics of Mobile Adhoc NETwork (MANET) are no infrastructure, no centralized administration and self configuring networks. The primary motivation of MANET deployment is to increase portability, flexibility and mobility but, mobility causes an unpredictable change in topology and makes routing more difficult. Efficient dynamic routing is a research challenge in such networks. In this paper we have evaluated the performance of three protocols namely AODV (Adhoc On demand Distance Vector routing), DSR (Dynamic Source Routing) reactive routing protocol and DSDV(Destination Sequenced Distance Vector) routing which is a proactive routing protocol on the basis of packet delivery ratio and normalized routing overhead using NS 2 simulator. Four different models are created by changing few parameters of traffic generator file and scenario file like pause time, speed of mobile nodes, network size and number of maximum connections and the results demonstrate that the difference in the mechanism of routing protocols lead to specific performance variation. The selection of an efficient routing protocol thus depends on different parameters of the MANET.

[1]  David A. Maltz,et al.  DSR: the dynamic source routing protocol for multihop wireless ad hoc networks , 2001 .

[2]  Wang Lin-zhu,et al.  Performance comparison of two routing protocols for ad hoc networks , 2009, 2009 WASE International Conference on Information Engineering.

[3]  Bartosz Mielczarek,et al.  Scenario-based performance analysis of routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks , 1999, MobiCom.

[4]  Farhat Anwar,et al.  A performance comparison of proactive and reactive routing protocols of Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) , 2007 .

[5]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers , 1994, SIGCOMM.

[6]  Samir Ranjan Das,et al.  Comparative performance evaluation of routing protocols for mobile, ad hoc networks , 1998, Proceedings 7th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (Cat. No.98EX226).

[7]  Yasser Kamal Hassan,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Mobility Speed over MANET Routing Protocols , 2010, Int. J. Netw. Secur..

[8]  Zhu Pei-dong A Survey of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Networks , 2005 .

[9]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.

[10]  Tracy Camp,et al.  A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research , 2002, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[11]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks , 2001, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[12]  Mohammed Bouhorma,et al.  Performance comparison of ad-hoc routing protocols AODV and DSR , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems.