Assisting the development of innovative responsive façade elements using building performance simulation

Thermal mass is usually positively associated with energy efficiency and thermal comfort in buildings. However, the slow response of heavyweight constructions is not beneficial at all times, as these dynamic effects may actually also increase heating and cooling energy demand during intermittent operation or can cause unwanted discomfort. This study investigates the potential of energy simulations to support the exploration-driven development of two innovative responsive building elements: “Spong3D” and “Convective Concrete”. Both use fluid flow (Spong3D: water, Convective Concrete: air) inside the construction to reduce building energy demand by exploiting the use of natural energy sinks and sources in the ambient environment, aiming to make more intelligent use of thermal mass. During the development of these concepts, different simulation tools were used alongside experiments for e.g. materials selection, climate analysis, comfort prediction and risk assessment. By presenting the results from a series of simulation studies and by reflecting on their application, this paper shows how computational building performance analyses can play a useful role in ill-defined R&D processes.

[1]  P.J.C.J. De Wilde,et al.  Computational Support for the Selection of Energy Saving Building Components , 2004 .

[2]  Clarice Bleil De Souza,et al.  Contrasting paradigms of design thinking: the building thermal simulation tool user vs. the building designer , 2012 .

[3]  Jan Hensen,et al.  Integrated building performance simulation: Progress, prospects and requirements , 2015 .

[4]  T. V. D. Graaf,et al.  The international energy agency , 2014 .

[5]  Young Tae Chae,et al.  Modeling ventilated slab systems using a hollow core slab: Implementation in a whole building energy simulation program , 2013 .

[6]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  On the role of computational support for designers in action , 2015 .

[7]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[8]  C. Xie.  Interactive Heat Transfer Simulations for Everyone , 2012 .

[9]  Fabio Favoino,et al.  Review of current status, requirements and opportunities for building performance simulation of adaptive facades† , 2017 .

[10]  Jan L M Hensen,et al.  FOURIER AND BIOT NUMBERS AND THE ACCURACY OF CONDUCTION MODELLING , 1994 .

[11]  Jlm Jan Hensen,et al.  Simulation-based support for product development of innovative building envelope components , 2014 .

[12]  Shady Attia,et al.  Simulation-based decision support tool for early stages of zero-energy building design , 2012 .

[13]  Caroline M. Clevenger,et al.  Metrics to assess design guidance , 2011 .

[14]  David Jason Gerber,et al.  Designing-in performance: A framework for evolutionary energy performance feedback in early stage design , 2014 .

[15]  Jlm Jan Hensen,et al.  Climate adaptive building shells: state-of-the-art and future challenges , 2013 .

[16]  Jan Hensen,et al.  Convective Concrete: Additive Manufacturing to facilitate activation of thermal mass , 2017 .

[17]  P Pieter-Jan Hoes,et al.  The potential of lightweight low-energy houses with hybrid adaptable thermal storage: Comparing the performance of promising concepts , 2016 .