Performance monitoring in optical networks using asynchronously acquired samples with nonideal sampling systems and intersymbol interference

This paper presents a study on the influence of nonideal sampling in asynchronous Q-factor monitoring. An overestimation of the Q-factor of signals impaired with optical noise may occur if the averaging effects due to nonideal sampling affect only the noise component of the monitored signal. It is shown that this problem can be rectified using a correction factor, dependent only on the receiver parameters. This allows reasonable Q-factor estimates using sampling systems with aperture times close to the monitored signal bit period. Nonideal sampling may also affect the signal component of the monitored signal. For such cases, a novel and accurate technique is presented to estimate the Q factor using asynchronous histograms, which takes into account changes in the shape of the monitored signal due to averaging effects. Numerical simulations are used to evaluate the proposed technique achieving Q-factor estimates within a 14% error margin, independently of the sampling aperture for the considered range. Distortion affecting the signal due to the transmission system can also be handled by the new technique presented in this paper. It is verified that the impact of intersymbol interference due to chromatic dispersion or electrical filtering in the receiver on the performance of the system is well reflected by the estimated Q factor.

[1]  H. Takara,et al.  Quality monitoring of optical signals influenced by chromatic dispersion in a transmission fiber using averaged Q-factor evaluation , 2001, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[2]  Ippei Shake,et al.  Optical signal quality monitoring method based on optical sampling , 1998 .

[3]  F. Matera,et al.  Role of Q-factor and of time jitter in the performance evaluation of optically amplified transmission systems , 2000, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[4]  N. S. Bergano,et al.  Margin measurements in optical amplifier system , 1993, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[5]  N. Hanik,et al.  Application of amplitude histograms for quality of service measurements of optical channels and fault identification , 1998, 24th European Conference on Optical Communication. ECOC '98 (IEEE Cat. No.98TH8398).

[6]  Hidehiko Takara,et al.  Chromatic dispersion dependence of asynchronous amplitude histogram evaluation of NRZ signal , 2003 .

[7]  A.E. Willner,et al.  Optical performance monitoring , 2004, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[8]  Adolfo V. T. Cartaxo,et al.  Correction to "Power penalty assessment in optically preamplified receivers with arbitrary optical f , 2002 .

[9]  M. Kahrs,et al.  50 years of RF and microwave sampling , 2003 .

[10]  R. Wiesmann,et al.  Cost effective performance monitoring in WDM systems , 2000, Optical Fiber Communication Conference. Technical Digest Postconference Edition. Trends in Optics and Photonics Vol.37 (IEEE Cat. No. 00CH37079).

[11]  Walter R. Leeb,et al.  Bit error probability estimation algorithm for signal supervision in all-optical networks , 1999 .

[12]  Hidehiko Takara,et al.  Averaged Q-factor method using amplitude histogram evaluation for transparent monitoring of optical signal-to-noise ratio degradation in optical transmission system , 2002 .

[13]  N. Hanik,et al.  Application of amplitude histograms to monitor performance of optical channels , 1999 .

[14]  Adolfo V. T. Cartaxo,et al.  Gaussian approach for performance evaluation of optically preamplified receivers with arbitrary optical and electrical filters , 2001 .