Trajectory Options for Human Mars Missions

This paper explores trajectory options for the huma n exploration of Mars, with an emphasis on conjunction-class missions. Conjunction-class missions are characterized by short in-space durations with long surface stays, a s opposed to the long in-space durations and short surface stays characteristic of oppositio n-class missions. Earth-Mars and Mars- Earth trajectories are presented across a series of mission opportunities and transfer times in order to explore the space of possible crew and cargo transfer trajectories. In the specific instance of crew transfer from Earth to Mars, the p otential for aborting the mission without capture into Mars orbit is also of interest. As suc h two additional classes of trajectories are considered: free-return trajectories, where the tra jectory would return the crew to Earth after a fixed period of time; and propulsive-abort trajectories, where the propulsive capability of the transfer vehicle is used to modif y the trajectory during a Mars swing-by. The propulsive requirements of a trajectory, due to their associated impact on spacecraft mass, are clearly of interest in assessing trajecto ries for human Mars missions. Beyond the propulsive requirements, trajectory selection can h ave a significant impact on the entry velocity and therefore the aeroassist system requir ements. The paper suggests potential constraints for entry velocities at Earth and Mars. Based upon Mars entry velocity, the 2- year period free-return abort trajectory is shown t o be less desirable than previously considered for many mission opportunities.

[1]  Reuben R. Rohrschneider,et al.  Entry System Options for Human Return from the Moon and Mars , 2007 .

[2]  G. L. Brauer,et al.  Capabilities and applications of the Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories (POST). Program summary document , 1977 .

[3]  Gerald Walberg,et al.  How shall we go to Mars? A review of mission scenarios , 1992 .

[4]  Juan R. Cruz,et al.  Entry, Descent, and Landing Technology Concept Trade Study for Increasing Payload Mass to the Surface of Mars , 2005 .

[5]  Richard W. Powell,et al.  The effect of interplanetary trajectory options on a manned Mars aerobrake configuration , 1990 .

[6]  Bernard Laub Thermal Protection Concepts and Issues for Aerocapture at Titan , 2003 .

[7]  James M. Longuski,et al.  Mars Free Returns via Gravity Assist from Venus , 2002 .

[8]  Richard W. Powell,et al.  Aerodynamic requirements of a manned Mars aerobraking transfer vehicle , 1990 .

[9]  Damon Landau,et al.  A Reassessment of Trajectory Options for Human Missions to Mars , 2004 .

[10]  R. Manning,et al.  Mars exploration entry, descent and landing challenges , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[11]  Robert M. Zubrin,et al.  Mars direct - A simple, robust, and cost effective architecture for the Space Exploration Initiative , 1991 .

[12]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Entry Descent and Landing Challenges of Human Mars Exploration , 2006 .

[13]  R. Battin An introduction to the mathematics and methods of astrodynamics , 1987 .

[14]  G Sova,et al.  Aerodynamic Preliminary Analysis System II: Part II---User''s Manual , 1991 .

[15]  William M. Congdon,et al.  Mars Pathfinder entry temperature data, aerothermal heating, and heatshield material response , 1998 .

[16]  M. E. Tauber,et al.  Stagnation-point radiative heating relations for earth and Mars entries , 1991 .

[17]  Reuben R. Rohrschneider,et al.  Entry system options for human return from the Moon and Mars , 2005 .

[18]  D. Vallado Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications , 1997 .

[19]  Dean R Chapman,et al.  An approximate analytical method for studying entry into planetary atmospheres , 1958 .