Modelling linguistic taxonomic dynamics

This paper presents the results of the application of a bit-string model of languages (Schulze and Stauffer 2005) to problems of taxonomic patterns. The questions addressed include the following: (1) Which parameters are minimally needed for the development of a taxonomic dynamics leading to the type of distribution of language family sizes currently attested (as measured in the number of languages per family), which appears to be a power-law? (2) How may such a model be coupled with one of the dynamics of speaker populations leading to the type of language size seen today, which appears to follow a log-normal distribution?

[1]  Teemu Leppänen,et al.  Modeling language competition , 2004 .

[2]  Ing Ren Tsang,et al.  Theoretical model for the evolution of the linguistic diversity , 2005, physics/0505197.

[3]  Tao Gong,et al.  Coevolution of lexicon and syntax from a simulation perspective , 2005, Complex..

[4]  D. Nettle.  Using Social Impact Theory to simulate language change , 1999 .

[5]  Dietrich Stauffer,et al.  MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF THE RISE AND THE FALL OF LANGUAGES , 2005 .

[6]  Partha Niyogi,et al.  The Computational Study of Diachronic Linguistics , 2002 .

[7]  Sverker Johansson,et al.  Origins of Language: Constraints on hypotheses , 2005 .

[8]  J. W. Minett,et al.  The invasion of language: emergence, change and death. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  Christian Schulze,et al.  Computer Simulation of Language Competition by Physicists , 2006 .

[10]  R. Axelrod.  The Dissemination of Culture , 1997 .

[11]  David Gil,et al.  The World Atlas of Language Structures , 2005 .

[12]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Selection Model of , 2022 .

[13]  S. Strogatz,et al.  Linguistics: Modelling the dynamics of language death , 2003, Nature.

[14]  P. Drozd,et al.  The size distribution of conspecific populations: the peoples of New Guinea , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Dietrich Stauffer,et al.  On the relation between structural diversity and geographical distance among languages: Observations and computer simulations , 2006, physics/0607031.

[16]  Hildegard Meyer-Ortmanns,et al.  Competition of Languages and Their Hamming Distance , 2005, physics/0508229.

[17]  D. Nettle,et al.  Linguistic diversity of the Americas can be reconciled with a recent colonization. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  S. Mufwene.  The ecology of language evolution , 2001 .

[19]  John McWhorter,et al.  The power of Babel : a natural history of language , 2003 .

[20]  Søren Wichmann,et al.  On the power-law distribution of language family sizes , 2005, Journal of Linguistics.

[21]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Parallel extinction risk and global distribution of languages and species , 2003, Nature.

[22]  Ing Ren Tsang,et al.  Bounded fitness landscapes and the evolution of the linguistic diversity , 2005, physics/0510249.

[23]  Ing Ren Tsang,et al.  Scaling relations for diversity of languages , 1999 .

[24]  M. Newman.  Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[25]  P. Niyogi,et al.  Computational and evolutionary aspects of language , 2002, Nature.

[26]  D. Stauffer,et al.  Non-equilibrium and irreversible simulation of competition among languages , 2006, physics/0601160.

[27]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Simulating the Evolution of Language , 2002, Springer London.

[28]  Damián H. Zanette.  Self-Similarity in the Taxonomic Classification of Human Languages , 2001, Adv. Complex Syst..

[29]  Partha Niyogi,et al.  Book Reviews: The Computational Nature of Language Learning and Evolution, by Partha Niyogi , 2007, CL.