Quantum dot labeling and tracking of cultured limbal epithelial cell transplants in vitro.

PURPOSE Cultured human limbal epithelial cells (HLECs) have shown promise in the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency but little is known about their survival, behavior, and long-term fate after transplantation. The aim of this research was to evaluate, in vitro, quantum dot (Qdot) technology as a tool for tracking transplanted HLECs. METHODS In vitro cultured HLECs were labeled with Qdot nanocrystals. Toxicity was assessed using live-dead assays. The effect on HLEC function was assessed using colony-forming efficiency assays and expression of CK3, P63alpha, and ABCG2. Sheets of cultured HLECs labeled with Qdot nanocrystals were transplanted onto decellularized human corneoscleral rims in an organ culture model and observed to investigate the behavior of transplanted cells. RESULTS Quantum dot labeling had no detrimental effect on HLEC viability or function in vitro. Proliferation resulted in a gradual reduction in Qdot signal but sufficient signal was present to allow tracking of cells through multiple generations. Cells labeled with Qdots could be reliably detected and observed using confocal microscopy for at least 2 weeks after transplantation in our organ culture model. In addition, it was possible to label and observe epithelial cells in intact human corneas by using the Rostock corneal module adapted for use with the Heidelberg HRA. CONCLUSIONS This work demonstrates that Qdots combined with existing clinical equipment could be used to track HLEC for up to 2 weeks after transplantation; however, our model does not permit the assessment of cell labeling beyond 2 weeks. Further characterization in in vivo models are required.

[1]  A. Shortt,et al.  Characterization of the Limbal Epithelial Stem Cell Niche: Novel Imaging Techniques Permit In Vivo Observation and Targeted Biopsy of Limbal Epithelial Stem Cells , 2007, Stem cells.

[2]  S. E. James,et al.  Outcomes and DNA analysis of ex vivo expanded stem cell allograft for ocular surface reconstruction. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[3]  Caroline Seydel,et al.  Quantum Dots Get Wet , 2003, Science.

[4]  A. J. Tavares,et al.  Quantum dots as contrast agents for in vivo tumor imaging: progress and issues , 2011, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[5]  R. Guthoff,et al.  In Vivo Investigations of the Corneal Epithelium With the Confocal Rostock Laser Scanning Microscope (RLSM) , 2006, Cornea.

[6]  W. Liu,et al.  Degradation or excretion of quantum dots in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2010, BMC biotechnology.

[7]  Y. Barrandon,et al.  Three clonal types of keratinocyte with different capacities for multiplication. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  G. Rao,et al.  Early results of penetrating keratoplasty after cultivated limbal epithelium transplantation. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  G. A. Limb,et al.  Transplantation of ex vivo cultured limbal epithelial stem cells: a review of techniques and clinical results. , 2007, Survey of ophthalmology.

[10]  T. Sun,et al.  Existence of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate: Implications on epithelial stem cells , 1989, Cell.

[11]  M. J. Gómara,et al.  Conjugation of cell-penetrating peptides with poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-polyethylene glycol nanoparticles improves ocular drug delivery , 2015, International journal of nanomedicine.

[12]  S. Nie,et al.  Quantum dot bioconjugates for ultrasensitive nonisotopic detection. , 1998, Science.

[13]  Ronald T. Raines,et al.  Translocation of a beta-peptide across cell membranes. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[14]  Chen-Yuan Dong,et al.  Studies of intracorneal distribution and cytotoxicity of quantum dots: risk assessment of eye exposure. , 2011, Chemical research in toxicology.

[15]  M. Swihart,et al.  Nanotoxicity Assessment of Quantum Dots: From Cellular to Primate Studies , 2013 .

[16]  F. Beltram,et al.  A novel chimeric cell-penetrating peptide with membrane-disruptive properties for efficient endosomal escape. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[17]  D. Balasubramanian,et al.  Successful Reconstruction of Damaged Ocular Outer Surface in Humans Using Limbal and Conjuctival Stem Cell Culture Methods , 2003, Bioscience reports.

[18]  M. Green,et al.  Autonomous functional domains of chemically synthesized human immunodeficiency virus tat trans-activator protein. , 1988, Cell.

[19]  Fei Yu,et al.  Characterization of limbal stem cell deficiency by in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy: a microstructural approach. , 2012, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  G. Pellegrini,et al.  Limbal stem-cell therapy and long-term corneal regeneration. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  S. Gambhir,et al.  Noninvasive cell-tracking methods , 2011, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Michele De Luca,et al.  Long-term restoration of damaged corneal surfaces with autologous cultivated corneal epithelium , 1997, The Lancet.

[23]  Y. Barrandon,et al.  Cell size as a determinant of the clone-forming ability of human keratinocytes. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Ludmila Otilia Cinteza,et al.  Quantum dots in biomedical applications: advances and challenges , 2010 .

[25]  Francisco Figueiredo,et al.  13 years of cultured limbal epithelial cell therapy: A review of the outcomes , 2011, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[26]  Alex J Shortt,et al.  Corneal stem cells in the eye clinic. , 2011, British medical bulletin.

[27]  A. Shortt,et al.  Three‐Year Outcomes of Cultured Limbal Epithelial Allografts in Aniridia and Stevens‐Johnson Syndrome Evaluated Using the Clinical Outcome Assessment in Surgical Trials Assessment Tool , 2014, Stem cells translational medicine.

[28]  S. Futaki Membrane-permeable arginine-rich peptides and the translocation mechanisms. , 2005, Advanced drug delivery reviews.