Comparison of two spelling instruction techniques for adults who use augmentative and alternative communication

The study employed an alternating treatment design to investigate the effects of two instructional techniques on the acquisition and retention of spelling vocabulary by two adults with cerebral palsy who used augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): (a) the Copy-Write-Compare method (CWC) and (b) the Student-Directed Cueing method (SDC). SDC differs from CWC in that it directs the subject to attend to the differences between the subject's incorrectly spelled version of the word and the correct spelling. The results indicated that the subjects improved their spelling performance using both of the instructional techniques. Only minor differences were observed with respect to rates of acquisition of spelling vocabulary items for the two techniques. Post-test scores revealed a retention advantage for the SDC method of instruction for both subjects, although variation in the strength of the effect was observed. The study provides preliminary, empirically based guidelines for AAC specialists to conside...

[1]  J. Kauffman,et al.  Imitating Children's Errors to Improve Their Spelling Performance , 1978, Journal of Learning Disabilities.

[2]  P. Blumberg The effects of written attempts prior to correct visual presentation on spelling acquisition and retention , 1976 .

[3]  C. Bereiter,et al.  From behaviourism to cognitive behaviourism to cognitive development: Steps in the evolution of instructional design , 1984 .

[4]  V. Moore,et al.  A Systematic Approach to Teaching Reading and Spelling to a Nine‐year‐old Boy with Severely Impaired Literacy Skills , 1987 .

[5]  J. Bruno Customizing a Minspeak1 system for a preliterate child: a case example , 1989 .

[6]  D. Gast,et al.  Single Subject Research in Special Education , 1984 .

[7]  W. Yule,et al.  Spelling Remediation: a single case study , 1984 .

[8]  H Blau,et al.  Specific Hemispheric-Routing-TAK/v to Teach Spelling to Dyslexics , 1982, Journal of learning disabilities.

[9]  M. Gerber Generalization of Spelling Strategies by LD Students as a Result of Contingent Imitation/Modeling and Mastery Criteria , 1986, Journal of learning disabilities.

[10]  N. Zigmond,et al.  Spelling Instruction in Special Education Classrooms: A Survey of Practices , 1985, Exceptional children.

[11]  Virginia W. Berninger,et al.  Language profiles in nonspeaking individuals of normal intelligence with severe cerebral palsy , 1986 .

[12]  L. Siegel Definitional and Theoretical Issues and Research on Learning Disabilities , 1988, Journal of Learning Disabilities.

[13]  J. W. Schuster,et al.  Effects of a Constant Time Delay Procedure on the Written Spelling Performance of a Learning Disabled Student , 1987 .

[14]  R. J. Hall,et al.  Cognitive-Behavioral Training in Spelling for Learning Handicapped Students , 1989 .

[15]  S. Graham,et al.  Strategy Training and Teacher- vs. Student-Controllled Study Conditions: Effects on LD Students' Spelling Performance , 1985 .

[16]  Darrell Morris,et al.  Exploring the Concept of "Spelling Instructional Level" Through the Analysis of Error-Types , 1986, The Elementary School Journal.

[17]  R. Stennett,et al.  Developmental patterns in elemental reading skills: phoneme-grapheme and grapheme-phoneme correspondences. , 1972, Journal of educational psychology.

[18]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Postcriterion overlearning reduces the effectiveness of the method of adjusted learning , 1982 .

[19]  Dorothea P. Simon Spelling—A task analysis , 1976 .