Effect of turbulent transport models and grid spacing on pans calculations of a lid-driven cavity

Effect of Turbulent Transport Models and Grid Spacing on PANS Calculations of a Lid-Driven Cavity. (August 2004) Aditya Murthi, B. En., Amrita Institute of Technology and Science Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Sharath S. Girimaji The three-dimensional lid-driven cavity flow is investigated at Reynolds Number (Re)=10,000 for a wide range of spanwise aspect-ratios of 3:1:1,1:1:1 and 0.5:1:1, using the PANS (Partially Averaged Navier-Stokes) turbulence closure model. The PANS method is a variable resolution turbulence closure model, where the unresolvedto-total ratios of kinetic energy (fk) and dissipation (f2), serve as resolution control parameters. This study focuses on two main aspects of the PANS: first, the evaluation of Turbulent Transport models and second, the effect of grid spacing on accuracy of the numerical solution. The PANS calculations are tested against the LES and experimental results of Jordan (1994), in terms of both qualitative and quantitative quantities. The main conclusions are: (i) for a given fk value, the Zero-Transport (ZT) model is superior to the Maximum-Transport (MT) model for unresolved dissipation 2u, (ii) both the ZT and the MT models are adequate for unresolved kinetic energy Ku and, (iii) for a given grid size, the results depend heavily on grid spacing especially for larger fk values.

[1]  Robert L. Street,et al.  On End Wall Effects in a Lid-Driven Cavity Flow , 1984 .

[2]  Natarajan Ramanan,et al.  Linear stability of lid‐driven cavity flow , 1994 .

[3]  S. Ragab,et al.  On the Unsteady and Turbulent Characteristics of the Three-Dimensional Shear-Driven Cavity Flow , 1994 .

[4]  Robert L. Street,et al.  The Lid-Driven Cavity Flow: A Synthesis of Qualitative and Quantitative Observations , 1984 .

[5]  P. Moin,et al.  Application of a Fractional-Step Method to Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 1984 .

[6]  Robert L. Street,et al.  Numerical simulation of three‐dimensional flow in a cavity , 1985 .

[7]  Cyrus K. Aidun,et al.  Global stability of a lid‐driven cavity with throughflow: Flow visualization studies , 1991 .

[8]  R. Hwang,et al.  Effect of Reynolds number on the eddy structure in a lid-driven cavity , 1998 .

[9]  Mehdi R. Khorrami,et al.  Time-Accurate Simulations and Acoustic Analysis of Slat Free Shear Layer , 2002 .

[10]  U. Ghia,et al.  High-Re solutions for incompressible flow using the Navier-Stokes equations and a multigrid method , 1982 .

[11]  A. Acrivos,et al.  Steady flows in rectangular cavities , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  K. Lilly On the application of the eddy viscosity concept in the Inertial sub-range of turbulence , 1966 .

[13]  Robert L. Street,et al.  Visualization Studies of a Shear Driven Three-Dimensional Recirculating Flow , 1984 .

[14]  John W. Goodrich,et al.  Unsteady solution of incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 1988 .

[15]  Mehdi R. Khorrami,et al.  TIME-ACCURATE SIMULATIONS AND ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF , 2002 .

[16]  D. Wilcox Turbulence modeling for CFD , 1993 .

[17]  J. Koseff,et al.  Reynolds number and end‐wall effects on a lid‐driven cavity flow , 1989 .

[18]  Philippe R. Spalart,et al.  Trends in turbulence treatments , 2000 .

[19]  J. Deardorff A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers , 1970, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  M. Germano,et al.  Turbulence: the filtering approach , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  R. D. Mills Numerical Solutions of the Viscous Flow Equations for a Class of Closed Flows , 1965, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[22]  Karl Gustafson,et al.  Vortex dynamics of cavity flows , 1986 .