PII: S0042-6989(98)00234-X

Specific improvements of perceptual capabilities with practise are thought to give some clues about cortical plasticity and the localisation of cortical processing. In the present study, perceptual learning is used as a paradigm to separate mechanisms underlying the perception of different classes of motion stimuli. Primary motion stimuli (F-motion). are characterised by displacements of the luminance distribution. However, for secondary motion stimuli the movement is not accompanied by a corresponding luminance shift. Instead, moving objects are defined by their temporal frequency composition (m-motion) or by motion itself (u-motion). On theoretical grounds, the perception of secondary motion requires a higher degree of nonlinearity in the processing stream than the perception of primary motion but debate continues as to whether there might be a unique mechanism underlying the perception of both motion classes. In a large group of subjects, coherence thresholds for direction discrimination in random dot kinematograms of F-, m-, and u-motion were repeatedly measured in a staircase paradigm. Training effects were found on different timescales, within short sessions containing multiple staircases and over training periods of several months. They were fairly stable over long breaks without testing. When subjects were trained with two different motion stimuli in a sequence, an asymmetry in the transfer of perceptual learning was revealed: sensitivity increases achieved during practise of u-motion are largely transferred to F-motion, but u-motion perception does not profit from prior exposure to F-motion. This finding supports the view derived from modelling of motion processing that there must be at least partially separate systems. A primary motion detection mechanism falls short of discriminating direction in secondary motion stimuli, whereas a mechanism able to extract secondary motion will be inherently sensitive to primary motion. © 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Motion: the long and short of it. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[2]  Shaul Hochstein,et al.  How early is early vision? Evidence from perceptual learning , 1993 .

[3]  Johannes M. Zanker,et al.  Theta motion: a paradoxical stimulus to explore higher order motion extraction , 1993, Vision Research.

[4]  L. Vaina,et al.  Learning to ignore: psychophysics and computational modeling of fast learning of direction in noisy motion stimuli. , 1995, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[5]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  P. McOwan,et al.  A computational model of the analysis of some first-order and second-order motion patterns by simple and complex cells , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  R. L. Gregory,et al.  Perceptual filling in of artificially induced scotomas in human vision , 1991, Nature.

[8]  A. Johnston,et al.  A unified account of three apparent motion illusions , 1995, Vision Research.

[9]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination , 1987, Vision Research.

[10]  Trichur Raman Vidyasagar.  BASIC INFORMATION PROCESSING AND HIGHER COGNITION: DOES THE MAMMALIAN CEREBRAL CORTEX DEAL WITH THEM AT DIFFERENT HIERARCHICAL LEVELS? , 1996, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[11]  S. Edelman,et al.  Long-term learning in vernier acuity: Effects of stimulus orientation, range and of feedback , 1993, Vision Research.

[12]  J. Kaas,et al.  Reorganization of retinotopic cortical maps in adult mammals after lesions of the retina. , 1990, Science.

[13]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Johannes M. Zanker,et al.  Interaction between primary and secondary mechanisms in human motion perception , 1994, Vision Research.

[15]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Receptive field dynamics in adult primary visual cortex , 1992, Nature.

[16]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  Modeling perceptual learning: difficulties and how they can be overcome , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[17]  Andrew T. Smith,et al.  Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order motion in human vision , 1994, Vision Research.

[18]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Relative motion induced between stationary lines , 1978, Vision Research.

[19]  O Braddick,et al.  Orientation-Specific Learning in Stereopsis , 1973, Perception.

[20]  J M Zanker,et al.  Does Motion Perception Follow Weber's Law? , 1995, Perception.

[21]  T Poggio,et al.  Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. , 1991, Science.

[22]  Trichur Raman Vidyasagar,et al.  Perceptual learning in seeing form from motion , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Paul T. Sowden,et al.  Perceptual Learning of Stereoacuity , 1996, Perception.

[24]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning , 1997, Nature.

[25]  Lucia M. Vaina,et al.  Adaptive computational models of fast learning of motion direction discrimination , 1996, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  G Westheimer,et al.  A quantitative measure for short-term cortical plasticity in human vision , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Kaas,et al.  Rapid reorganization of cortical maps in adult cats following restricted deafferentation in retina , 1992, Vision Research.

[28]  H. Wilson,et al.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[29]  G. Sperling,et al.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  T. Poggio,et al.  Fast perceptual learning in hyperacuity , 1995, Vision Research.

[31]  Lothar Spillmann,et al.  Dynamic noise backgrounds facilitate target fading , 1992, Vision Research.

[32]  A. Johnston,et al.  Perceived motion of contrast-modulated gratings: Predictions of the multi-channel gradient model and the role of full-wave rectification , 1995, Vision Research.

[33]  R. Sekuler,et al.  A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination. , 1982, Science.

[34]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency , 1980, Nature.

[35]  Johannes M. Zanker.  On Perceptual learning in Human Motion Processing , 1995 .

[36]  George L. Gerstein,et al.  Simulation of dynamic receptive fields in primary visual cortex , 1994, Vision Research.

[37]  T D Albright,et al.  Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex. , 1992, Science.

[38]  Davida Y. Teller,et al.  Statistical properties of staircase estimates , 1970 .

[39]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Illusory motion in visual displays , 1984, Vision Research.

[40]  J. Zanker.  On the elementary mechanism underlying secondary motion processing. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[41]  C L Baker,et al.  A processing stream in mammalian visual cortex neurons for non-Fourier responses. , 1993, Science.

[42]  G Sperling,et al.  Two motion perception mechanisms revealed through distance-driven reversal of apparent motion. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.