Genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles on fish cells in vitro

Intrinsic genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of titanium dioxide (TiO2) engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) were evaluated in a metabolically competent, established fish cell line derived from rainbow trout (Oncorhyncus mykiss) gonadal tissue (i.e. RTG-2 cells). Prior to evaluation of the toxic potential, mean size of the ENPs was determined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). As a prerequisite, an extensive characterisation of the ENPs was carried out following sonication which enabled the synthesis of an efficient dosing strategy for the cells in which exposure in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) gave an optimal agglomeration effects compared to distilled water (H2O) and minimal essential media (MEM). Interaction of the ENPs with cells under scanning electron microscope (SEM) was also studied. The genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of the ENPs were determined either alone or in combination with ultraviolet radiation (i.e. UVA). Whilst genotoxic potential was determined by evaluating DNA strand breaks using single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) or the comet assay and induction of cytogenetic damage using cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus (MN) assay, cytotoxicity was determined by measuring the retention of supra vital stain, neutral red, by the lysosomes using the neutral red retention (NRR) assay. In addition, while performing the comet assay, lesion specific bacterial endonuclease, formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg), which recognises oxidised purine bases, was used to determine oxidative DNA damage. The results suggested that the highest concentration of the ENPs (i.e. 50 μg ml−1) did not produce elevations in DNA damage over 4 h (comet assay), 24 h (modified comet assay) or 48 h (MN assay) exposures in the absence of UVA irradiation, although there was a significant reduction in lysosomal integrity over 24 h exposure (NRR assay). The induction of MN did not show any enhanced levels as a function of ENP concentration. A significantly increased level of strand breaks was observed in combination with UVA (3 kJ m−2). In general, the NRR assay suggested elevated levels of cytotoxicity when the UVA exposure was carried out with MEM compared to PBS, although both showed an increase when in combination with the highest concentration of ENPs (i.e. 50 μg ml−1). Overall, the study emphasises the need for adoption of an holistic approach while evaluating the potential toxic effects of ENPs in which appropriate measures should be taken to avoid agglomeration or aggregation to facilitate efficient cellular uptake to evaluate potential biological responses.

[1]  Michael Depledge,et al.  Nanotechnology and the environment: risks and rewards. , 2005, Marine pollution bulletin.

[2]  E. Abraham,et al.  Identification of hydrogen peroxide oxidation sites of αA- and αB-crystallins , 1997 .

[3]  Jun-Jie Yin,et al.  Oxidative damage to nucleic acids photosensitized by titanium dioxide. , 1997, Free radical biology & medicine.

[4]  D. Eastmond,et al.  Induction of micronuclei, hyperdiploidy and chromosomal breakage affecting the centric/pericentric regions of chromosomes 1 and 9 in human amniotic fluid cells after treatment with asbestos and ceramic fibers. , 1997, Mutation research.

[5]  W. Mark Saltzman,et al.  Dilation and degradation of the brain extracellular matrix enhances penetration of infused polymer nanoparticles , 2007, Brain Research.

[6]  Awadhesh N Jha,et al.  Ecotoxicological applications and significance of the comet assay. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[7]  Elise C. Kohn,et al.  The microenvironment of the tumour–host interface , 2001, Nature.

[8]  John Weiner,et al.  Letter to the Editor , 1992, SIGIR Forum.

[9]  Wonyong Choi,et al.  Linear correlation between inactivation of E. coli and OH radical concentration in TiO2 photocatalytic disinfection. , 2004, Water research.

[10]  J. Ramsden.  What is Nanotechnology , 2005 .

[11]  A. Jha.  Genotoxicological studies in aquatic organisms: an overview. , 2004, Mutation research.

[12]  M. Fenech,et al.  The cytokinesis-block micronucleus technique: a detailed description of the method and its application to genotoxicity studies in human populations. , 1993, Mutation research.

[13]  C. Ogino,et al.  Recognition and effective degradation of 17beta-estradiol by anti-estradiol-antibody-immobilized TiO(2) nanoparticles. , 2007, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[14]  William P Gulledge.  Re: cyto- and genotoxicity of ultrafine TiO(2) particles in cultured human lymphoblastoid cells. , 2007, Mutation research.

[15]  S. Raisuddin,et al.  Relative sensitivity of fish and mammalian cells to sodium arsenate and arsenite as determined by alkaline single‐cell gel electrophoresis and cytokinesis‐block micronucleus assay , 2004, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[16]  Nick Serpone,et al.  Inorganic and organic UV filters: Their role and efficacy in sunscreens and suncare products , 2007 .

[17]  A. Pruski,et al.  Marine invertebrate eco-genotoxicology: a methodological overview. , 2002, Mutagenesis.

[18]  B. Sanderson,et al.  Cyto- and genotoxicity of ultrafine TiO2 particles in cultured human lymphoblastoid cells. , 2007, Mutation research.

[19]  Awadhesh N Jha,et al.  Reliable Comet assay measurements for detecting DNA damage induced by ionising radiation and chemicals. , 2006, Mutation research.

[20]  B. T. Nixon,et al.  Identification of hydrogen peroxide as a photoproduct toxic to human cells in tissue-culture medium irradiated with “daylight” fluorescent light , 1978, In Vitro.

[21]  A. Reller,et al.  Photoinduced reactivity of titanium dioxide , 2004 .

[22]  Ron C. Hardman.  A Toxicologic Review of Quantum Dots: Toxicity Depends on Physicochemical and Environmental Factors , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  T. Rajh,et al.  Cadmium removal from water using thiolactic acid-modified titanium dioxide nanoparticles , 2002 .

[24]  Awadhesh N Jha,et al.  Hydroxyl radicals (*OH) are associated with titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity and oxidative DNA damage in fish cells. , 2008, Mutation research.

[25]  Qamar Rahman,et al.  Evidence that ultrafine titanium dioxide induces micronuclei and apoptosis in Syrian hamster embryo fibroblasts. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[26]  R. J. Wang,et al.  Induction of single-strand DNA breaks in human cells by H2O2 formed in near-uv (black light) irradiated medium. , 1980, Radiation research.

[27]  Richard D Handy,et al.  Toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): gill injury, oxidative stress, and other physiological effects. , 2007, Aquatic toxicology.

[28]  D. Dvoranová,et al.  Reactive oxygen species produced upon photoexcitation of sunscreens containing titanium dioxide (an EPR study). , 2005, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[29]  J. Dungan.  Influence of nanoparticles on morphological differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells , 2008 .

[30]  A. Fujishima,et al.  Induction of cytotoxicity by photoexcited TiO2 particles. , 1992, Cancer research.

[31]  H. Utsumi,et al.  Quantitative determination of OH radical generation and its cytotoxicity induced by TiO(2)-UVA treatment. , 2002, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[32]  Pedro J J Alvarez,et al.  Comparative eco-toxicity of nanoscale TiO2, SiO2, and ZnO water suspensions. , 2006, Water research.

[33]  Robert A Hoke,et al.  Development of a base set of toxicity tests using ultrafine TiO2 particles as a component of nanoparticle risk management. , 2007, Toxicology letters.

[34]  K. Jan,et al.  Ultrafine titanium dioxide particles in the absence of photoactivation can induce oxidative damage to human bronchial epithelial cells. , 2005, Toxicology.

[35]  Mark Crane,et al.  The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles , 2008, Ecotoxicology.

[36]  Pratim Biswas,et al.  Assessing the risks of manufactured nanomaterials. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  B. Halliwell,et al.  Free radicals in biology and medicine , 1985 .

[38]  M. Moore,et al.  Do nanoparticles present ecotoxicological risks for the health of the aquatic environment? , 2006, Environment international.

[39]  D. Dixon,et al.  The use of fish cell cultures as an indication of contaminant toxicity to fish , 1985 .

[40]  M. Fenech.  The in vitro micronucleus technique. , 2000, Mutation research.

[41]  Bernhard Hennig,et al.  Alumina nanoparticles induce expression of endothelial cell adhesion molecules. , 2008, Toxicology letters.

[42]  M Liebsch,et al.  The International EU/COLIPA In Vitro Phototoxicity Validation Study: Results of Phase II (Blind Trial). Part 1: The 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test. , 1998, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[43]  M. Landolt,et al.  Anaphase aberrations: a measure of genotoxicity in mutagen-treated fish cells. , 1982, Environmental mutagenesis.