The Conformational Transitions and Dynamics of Burkholderia cepacia Lipase Regulated by Water-Oil Interfaces.

Structural dynamics and conformational transitions are crucial for the activities of enzymes. As one of the most widely used industrial biocatalysts, lipase could be activated by the water-oil interfaces. The interface activations were believed to be dominated by the close-to-open transitions of the lid subdomains. However, the detailed mechanism and the roles of structure transitions are still under debate. In this study, the dynamic structures and conformational transitions of Burkholderia cepacia lipase (LipA) were investigated by combining all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, enhanced sampling simulation, and spectrophotometric assay experiments. The conformational transitions between the lid-open and lid-closed states of LipA in aqueous solution are directly observed by the computational simulation methods. The interactions between the hydrophobic residues on the two lid-subdomains are the driven forces for the LipA closing. Meanwhile, the hydrophobic environment provided by the oil interfaces would separate the interactions between the lid-subdomains and promote the structure opening of LipA. Moreover, our studies demonstrate the opening of the lids structure is insufficient to initiate the interfacial activation, providing explanations for the inability of interfacial activation of many lipases with lid structures.

[1]  K. Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  Conserved conformational dynamics determine enzyme activity , 2022, Science advances.

[2]  D. Singh,et al.  Sources, purification, immobilization and industrial applications of microbial lipases: An overview , 2022, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[3]  W. Wang,et al.  A Valuable Product of Microbial Cell Factories: Microbial Lipase , 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[4]  Yan Xu,et al.  A phenylalanine dynamic switch controls the interfacial activation of Rhizopus chinensis lipase. , 2021, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[5]  Mitchell D. Miller,et al.  Moving beyond static snapshots: Protein dynamics and the Protein Data Bank , 2021, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[6]  P. Agarwal,et al.  Enzyme Dynamics: Looking Beyond a Single Structure , 2020, ChemCatChem.

[7]  Mojie Duan,et al.  Phosphorylation regulates the binding of intrinsically disordered proteins via a flexible conformation selection mechanism , 2020, Communications Chemistry.

[8]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers , 2020, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  L. Gonçalves,et al.  Modulation of lipase B from Candida antarctica properties via covalent immobilization on eco-friendly support for enzymatic kinetic resolution of rac-indanyl acetate , 2020, Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering.

[10]  E. Nicolau,et al.  Characterization of non-covalent immobilized Candida antartica lipase b over PS-b-P4VP as a model bio-reactive porous interface. , 2019, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[11]  L. Giorno,et al.  Influence of lipase immobilization mode on ethyl acetate hydrolysis in a continuous solid-gas biocatalytic membrane reactor. , 2019, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[12]  Simon C. Potter,et al.  The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019 , 2019, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin,et al.  Conformational dynamics and enzyme evolution , 2018, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[14]  Tianyue Jiang,et al.  Elucidation of lid open and orientation of lipase activated in interfacial activation by amphiphilic environment. , 2018, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[15]  Torsten Schwede,et al.  SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes , 2018, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  J. M. Sanchez-Ruiz,et al.  Cooperativity and flexibility in enzyme evolution. , 2018, Current opinion in structural biology.

[17]  Mohammad M. Sultan,et al.  Towards simple kinetic models of functional dynamics for a kinase subfamily , 2017, bioRxiv.

[18]  S. Hussain,et al.  Bacterial lipases: A review on purification and characterization. , 2017, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[19]  Alex Rodriguez,et al.  METAGUI 3: A graphical user interface for choosing the collective variables in molecular dynamics simulations , 2017, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[20]  Faez Iqbal Khan,et al.  The Lid Domain in Lipases: Structural and Functional Determinant of Enzymatic Properties , 2017, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[21]  M. Sansom,et al.  Interfacial activation of M37 lipase: A multi-scale simulation study , 2017, Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes.

[22]  Z. Ren,et al.  The role of dimer asymmetry and protomer dynamics in enzyme catalysis , 2017, Science.

[23]  Michele Parrinello,et al.  Enhancing Important Fluctuations: Rare Events and Metadynamics from a Conceptual Viewpoint. , 2016, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[24]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Perspective: Defining and quantifying the role of dynamics in enzyme catalysis. , 2016, The Journal of chemical physics.

[25]  Zhengyu Shu,et al.  Cell-bound lipases from Burkholderia sp. ZYB002: gene sequence analysis, expression, enzymatic characterization, and 3D structural model , 2016, BMC Biotechnology.

[26]  Peter L. Freddolino,et al.  Interfacial Activation of Candida antarctica Lipase B: Combined Evidence from Experiment and Simulation. , 2015, Biochemistry.

[27]  A. Kohen Role of Dynamics in Enzyme Catalysis: Substantial versus Semantic Controversies , 2014, Accounts of chemical research.

[28]  S. Kanaya,et al.  Requirement of lid2 for interfacial activation of a family I.3 lipase with unique two lid structures , 2012, The FEBS journal.

[29]  Wim F Vranken,et al.  ACPYPE - AnteChamber PYthon Parser interfacE , 2012, BMC Research Notes.

[30]  S. Tzeng,et al.  Protein activity regulation by conformational entropy , 2012, Nature.

[31]  Nigel S Scrutton,et al.  Good vibrations in enzyme-catalysed reactions. , 2012, Nature chemistry.

[32]  Zhengyu Shu,et al.  Production and Characteristics of the Whole-Cell Lipase from Organic Solvent Tolerant Burkholderia sp. ZYB002 , 2012, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology.

[33]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Solution structure of a minor and transiently formed state of a T4 lysozyme mutant , 2011, Nature.

[34]  Charalampos G. Kalodimos,et al.  Dynamic activation of an allosteric regulatory protein , 2009, Nature.

[35]  R. Nussinov,et al.  The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[36]  Alessandro Laio,et al.  A Kinetic Model of Trp-Cage Folding from Multiple Biased Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[37]  V. Vinson,et al.  Proteins in Motion , 2009, Science.

[38]  Massimiliano Bonomi,et al.  PLUMED: A portable plugin for free-energy calculations with molecular dynamics , 2009, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[39]  Carsten Kutzner,et al.  GROMACS 4:  Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[40]  D. Kern,et al.  Dynamic personalities of proteins , 2007, Nature.

[41]  A. Wand,et al.  Conformational entropy in molecular recognition by proteins , 2007, Nature.

[42]  A. Laio,et al.  A bias-exchange approach to protein folding. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[43]  D. A. Bosco,et al.  Enzyme Dynamics During Catalysis , 2002, Science.

[44]  R. Verger,et al.  Evidence for a pancreatic lipase subfamily with new kinetic properties. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[45]  D Schomburg,et al.  Extracellular lipase of Pseudomonas sp. strain ATCC 21808: purification, characterization, crystallization, and preliminary X-ray diffraction data , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[46]  G. Ellman,et al.  Tissue sulfhydryl groups. , 1959, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[47]  L. Sarda,et al.  Action de la lipase pancréatique sur les esters en émulsion , 1958 .