First Year Computing Students' Perceptions of Authenticity in Assessment

The problem of how best to assess student learning is a fundamental one in education. Changes to computer science curricula seek to emphasise teaching practices that promote deep learning through direct, contextual examination of student performance on tasks that resemble those of practitioners, rather than more traditional methods. This kind of "authentic assessment" is becoming more popular as it appears to incorporate employability skills associated with professional practice into the curriculum in a natural way. In this paper, we report on an investigation into how computing students themselves understand the terminology of authentic assessment. We give a brief summary of some of the salient points of the theory before using a simple qualitative methodology to analyse responses from a cohort of first year students on their understanding of the term. We produce a learner characterisation of the concept and compare this to those found in educational models of this assessment approach. We comment on the similarities and differences that emerge and draw inferences about its use and the necessary scaffolding that should accompany it in order for it to be successful.

[1]  Ville Isomöttönen,et al.  Learning mechanisms in multidisciplinary teamwork with real customers and open-ended problems , 2015 .

[2]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[3]  D. Boud Assessment and learning: contradictory or complementary? , 1995 .

[4]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology , 2009 .

[5]  Åsa Cajander,et al.  Development of professional competencies in engineering education , 2011, 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[6]  Peter C. Honebein,et al.  Constructivism and the Design of Learning Environments: Context and Authentic Activities for Learning , 1993 .

[7]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[8]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[9]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: conceptual frameworks and educational contexts. , 2000 .

[10]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[11]  Allan Collins,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship and Instructional Technology. Technical Report. , 1988 .

[12]  P. Kirschner,et al.  A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment , 2004 .

[13]  J. Petraglia Reality by Design: The Rhetoric and Technology of Authenticity in Education , 1998 .

[14]  J. Lave Cultural psychology: The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding , 1990 .

[15]  Orit Hazzan,et al.  Guide to Teaching Computer Science: An Activity-Based Approach , 2011 .

[16]  Mats Daniels Professional Competencies for Real?: A Question about Identity! , 2016, ITiCSE.

[17]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Authentic assessment, student and teacher perceptions: the practical value of the five‐dimensional framework , 2006 .

[18]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  “Thick” authenticity: new media and authentic learning , 1999 .

[19]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[20]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[21]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Authenticity is in the eye of the beholder: student and teacher perceptions of assessment authenticity , 2008 .

[22]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The effect of practical experience on perceptions of assessment authenticity, study approach, and learning outcomes , 2008 .

[23]  Mantz Yorke,et al.  Embedding employability into the curriculum , 2006 .

[24]  Allan Collins,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship and Instructional Technology , 1988 .

[25]  G. Boulton‐Lewis Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[26]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. 2nd Edition , 1993 .

[27]  Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi,et al.  The Effects of Project Based Learning on Undergraduate Students ’ Achievement and Self-Efficacy Beliefs Towards Science Teaching , 2015 .

[28]  Hanna Salovaara,et al.  An exploration of students' strategy use in inquiry-based computer-supported collaborative learning , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[29]  G. Wiggins Assessing student performance : exploring the purpose and limits of testing , 1993 .

[30]  R. Rorty,et al.  Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity , 2000 .

[31]  David Boud,et al.  The Challenge of Problem Based Learning , 1991 .